Tonight I played some 5/0 blitz on ICC and decided to open with 1.e4 for basically the first time in my life. Based on the reputation, I was expecting wild attacks every game, but I've got to admit I was a bit disappointed. Here are some observations from probably 15 games.
-I don't think e4 and d4 are as different as they're made out to be. Both can be sharp or boring, depending on what the players decide.
-I think the objective of the French defense is to give both players awful positions. I can't stand playing in that opening. I will no longer be friends with anyone that plays the French as their main response to e4
-I am dangerously unprepared to play against the Sicilian.
-Against my normal d4, every once in a while I'll play someone that plays one of those really passive Indian setups, sort of like a KID but with a bishop on e7 instead of g7. It turns out that those people exist in the e4 world too. They'll play e5, d6, Nf6, Be7, O-O, Nbd7, c6, Qc7, etc. Playing against those positions is like nails on a chalk board.
-People that think d4 is boring but play the Ruy need to be more liberal in handing out the word "boring" haha. I think the Ruy is the QGD for e4.
And here are some e4 = d4 comparisons.
Ruy = QGD
Exchange French = Exchange Slav
Sicilian = Grunfeld
Pirc = KID
Petrov = London
That's about all I've got for tonight. My favorite game is the one below. I was sort of winging it with Dragon theory, but it turned out ok. Not the best by any means, but a heck of a lot of fun.
http://www.chessvideos.tv/chess-game...r.php?id=75993