Quote:
Originally Posted by A-Rod's Cousin
Baseball Reference has an Elo rating system for players who meet certain minimum criteria. Apparently the "matches" are voted on by people who visit the website. Kinda weird. They should just generate the winners via computer. Kinda neat, though no player in baseball history has even a 2500+ elo, which seems wrong. So there are no baseball "Grandmasters". Though it appears Babe Ruth was an International Master of baseball. Back when the game was played against white American men only. lol.
Juan Castro parlayed a 655 career elo rating into 17 years and $8 million in earnings. Unbelievable. -5 WAR in his illustrious career. Must be nice.
The 2500 mark isn't intrinsically GM-like, and BR ratings can't be compared to FIDE ratings.
You could start a server called PhastDooshChess, have every newlyreg begin with a 5000 elo, and use a pretty high
K-factor. And as the site gained popularity, the emerging ladder would make sense in relation to itself--the strongest figures, approaching 10,000 Elo, standing out as clearly superior to the puny 2750s--but not to FIDE or
BBRef's Elo ratings or International Bass Fishing ratings (if they have them) or whatever else. Even on chess.com, blitz, standard, and correspondence aren't directly comparable.