Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
*** Chess BBV *** *** Chess BBV ***

06-12-2011 , 11:08 PM
Oh shoot, I'm sorry. I must have messed up the PGN afterward when I was messing around with it in examination mode. He never played Bg2, the game was drawn by repetition.
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
06-12-2011 , 11:38 PM
Ah, OK. One thought when looking at the game is that you might have rushed the pawn break with ...c5, especially since your queen ends up very awkwardly placed on e8.

Personally, I find it more pleasant to play for the ...e5 break in similar positions (to the point of unhealthy dogmatism, probably, although given the choice, ...e5 keeps the pawn structure unbalanced, frees the c8 bishop more directly).

Maybe you could have done that here, either starting with 9...Nd5 so that the queen could support e5, or with 9...Qa5 or something. ...Nd5 looks helpful anyway in terms of relieving some of the pressure on Black's position.
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
06-12-2011 , 11:40 PM
It was definitely rushed in retrospect. He could have really tortured my queen with minor pieces for awhile if he wanted to.
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
06-13-2011 , 04:54 PM
Well, I played the weekend Congress in Cumbria and started off well; win over a younger kid rated about 1900, then a forfeit win over a master who didn't show up. Somehow, I was paired with the same master again in round 3, and I held a draw, leaving me with 2.5/3 going into the last day.

I was paired with a weird player; very old guy who plays extremely unconventional openings but obviously studies them (I watched him give a 30 minute postmortem of his round 2 game vs an IM, which started 1.e4 e5 2.a3, where he showed all the lines he'd prepared). I'd seen several of his games and he had a notable tendency to make a lot of pawn moves and dare you to exploit it; we were rated very similar, about 2150 FIDE each. So, off we start:

1. e4 e6 2. f4 d5 3. e5 c5 4. b4 Qb6 5. bxc5 Bxc5 6. Nf3 Bf2+ 7. Ke2 Nc6 8. c3 Bc5 9. d4 Be7 10. Kf2 Nh6 11. h3 O-O 12. g4 f6 13. Kg3 Nf7 14. Qc2 Qc7 15. Kg2 fxe5 16. fxe5 Nxd4 17. Nxd4 Nxe5 18. Rh2 Bh4 19. Kg1



As you can see, he has pursued his weird random style of chess, and I have played relatively normal. When taunted enough, I went for the sac of knight for two pawns, figuring my lead in development and his unsafe king would provide sufficient compensation. However, after long thought here, I couldn't find the winning continuation and he slowly consolidated and I lost. This is the first game in a long time that I can recall just flat out missing a clear (and beautiful) tactical win (by 19...Nxg4 20.hxg4 Qg3+ 21. Qg2 Rxf1+ 22. Kxf1 Qe1#, with other alternatives also losing for him) and when I found it in the computer after the game, it absolutely took the air out of my enthusiasm for the tourney.

I then collapsed in the last round and was beaten like a child by the other IM in the tourney
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
06-14-2011 , 12:09 AM
OMG. I was just playing a 15 min game on FICS and my opponent was soooooooooooo slow. So I looked at the chat window and saw they were discussing poker. It was getting painful to read. Gorgonian was involved for a bit, but I think it killed him too.

On the plus side, I won my game on time (with 8.5 minutes left on move 29...)!
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
06-14-2011 , 12:47 AM
such a heartbreak CW. Maybe the old dude was channeling Diemer, I saw a couple of of his games in a book on the history of the Rilton Cup (he played there one year) and they were refreshingly insane
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
06-14-2011 , 02:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ganstaman
OMG. I was just playing a 15 min game on FICS and my opponent was soooooooooooo slow. So I looked at the chat window and saw they were discussing poker. It was getting painful to read. Gorgonian was involved for a bit, but I think it killed him too.

On the plus side, I won my game on time (with 8.5 minutes left on move 29...)!
God you saw that? I wanted to kill myself.
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
06-14-2011 , 06:00 AM
in that case I'm sure you all understand why I locked the chess v poker thread.
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
06-14-2011 , 07:03 AM
noooooooooo

keep the thread open and invite fics people to discuss
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
06-14-2011 , 08:42 AM
i'll really miss my monthly lol at the new guy who drops in and says something like "i haven't read the thread but computers have solved chess and yadadada..."
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
06-14-2011 , 02:36 PM
Brag: Mated a guy in 25 moves on ICC, considered it very routine and not all that challenging, realized that 12 months ago he would have been the highest-rated player I'd even beaten.
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
06-14-2011 , 02:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KyleJRM82
Brag: Mated a guy in 25 moves on ICC, considered it very routine and not all that challenging, realized that 12 months ago he would have been the highest-rated player I'd even beaten.
Congrats Kyle, seems like you're really making some strides lately, I'm impressed. Have you had a chance to play rated USCF games much?
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
06-14-2011 , 03:44 PM
Not since February. Everything seems to be conspiring against me getting to any OTB tourneys lately. Starting Monday, my wife starts a new job where she works a straight M-F, 9-5 job, so I'm hoping for a lot more opportunities this summer and fall.

At the very least, I'll be in the Springfield (Ill.) tournament on July 23, just a one-day four-round G/65, and then the Thanksgiving Open in St. Louis. That one will be really important to me because that was my first tournament last year, so it'll be a nice measuring stick to see if I've improved.
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
06-15-2011 , 02:16 AM
I just played this 15min game on FICS. I was white:
Code:
[White "ganstaman"]
[Black "someone else"]

1. e4 g6 2. d4 Bg7 3. Be3 d6 4. Qd2 Nf6 5. Nc3 c6 6. O-O-O O-O 7. Bh6 Qa5
8. h4 Nbd7 9. f3 e5 10. Bxg7 Kxg7 11. h5 Nxh5 12. Rxh5 gxh5 13. Qg5+ Kh8
14. Nh3 f6 15. Qxh5 Nb6 16. g3 Bxh3 17. Bxh3 Rg8 18. Bf5 Rg7 19. Rh1 exd4
20. Bxh7 Qxh5 21. Rxh5 Rxh7 {White resigns} 0-1
http://www.chessvideos.tv/chess-game...r.php?id=45871

We reached this position, with white to play, after 19. exd4:



Beat: I forgot the 5th rank was just opened up, so I played 20. Bxh7 and lost.
Brag: Just after I did that, I realized that I probably could have won with
Spoiler:
20. Nd5!

Variance: It was an unrated game.
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
06-15-2011 , 02:51 AM
does it really win after 20.-Qxa2? At least 21.Bxh7 Qa1+ 22.Kd2 Qxh1 23.Qxh1 Rxh7 seems to defend
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
06-15-2011 , 03:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by smilingbill
does it really win after 20.-Qxa2? At least 21.Bxh7 Qa1+ 22.Kd2 Qxh1 23.Qxh1 Rxh7 seems to defend
What about 20. Nd5 Qxa2 21. Nxf6 adding another attacker around the black king? Not only does it hit h7, but it also keeps the king from g8. I don't think 21...Qa1 is really anything to worry about, as the checks have to stop eventually.

Plus, at low ply, the computer confirms that 21. Nxf6 works. Which is nice. It would have been easy to play in a blitz game. Maybe a bit harder in a longer game, but white would probably be lost without it anyway so it would probably get played quickly.
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
06-16-2011 , 08:22 PM
I liked it better when I was playing lazily and getting beat by it. Now I'm just getting flat out-played by anyone and everyone.
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
06-16-2011 , 08:54 PM
Ahh, that feels a little better. More like Caro-Can't, amirite?

http://www.chessvideos.tv/chess-game...r.php?id=45938
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
06-16-2011 , 10:59 PM
Here's a game I just played on FICS. I felt pretty good about this game, but I'd be interested in any comments about it.

http://www.chessvideos.tv/chess-game...r.php?id=45951
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
06-16-2011 , 11:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gorgonian
Here's a game I just played on FICS. I felt pretty good about this game, but I'd be interested in any comments about it.

http://www.chessvideos.tv/chess-game...r.php?id=45951
In short ... black played horribly!
c6, d6 & e6 in the opening just give you the centre for free & allows you to support it ... and the f5 'break' didn't achieve anything ... and then exchanging the best piece (g7 bishop) in the opening (rather than simply Qc7) just makes things worse for black - bad bishop, less space, unco-ordinated pieces ... makes the queenside break so obvious & easy to achieve.
But you played well ... :P
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
06-17-2011 , 12:07 AM
After studying the French, I finally have a response for 1. d4 e6. 2. e4!!

I used to have this strong hate for the French and I no longer have any idea why. The main lines are just so fun and interesting for both sides, but white especially. So I now insta transpose to the pirc and french when possible. I'm strongly considering swapping over to 1. e4 but I have this strong aversion to it since I absolutely love facing 1. e4 as black. Black just has so much flexibility in the sicilian. Being ready to face everything from the sveshnikov to najdorf to kan seems like a very daunting task for somebody who hasn't played 1. e4 in about 1000 rating points. And I generally think the anti-sicilians are just plain terrible when facing decent players.
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
06-17-2011 , 12:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HipHopRTR
In short ... black played horribly!
c6, d6 & e6 in the opening just give you the centre for free & allows you to support it ... and the f5 'break' didn't achieve anything ... and then exchanging the best piece (g7 bishop) in the opening (rather than simply Qc7) just makes things worse for black - bad bishop, less space, unco-ordinated pieces ... makes the queenside break so obvious & easy to achieve.
But you played well ... :P
Yes I felt that way, too. It was nice to actually play someone I was better than for once. Been getting trounced in team league a lot lately.
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
06-17-2011 , 06:37 AM
If you play the Sicilian as Black it makes it so much easier to play 1.e4 , and vice versa. I'd say the same about 1. d4 and the QGD/Nimzo-Indian.
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
06-17-2011 , 07:01 AM
Hi Gang, I am new to chess BBV so please tell me the best to post text of a game if there is one to make it easier to read.

I had to write in for a brag as I am new to online chess but been playing it for 25 years or so. I am have been playing real time and correspondence and generally getting belted. I joined a tournament and found myself up against a rated player of 1741 and I was 1381 (due to being new). Here was the game:

Rated Tournament game, days per move ( started at: 2011-03-29 08:59:04, finished at: 2011-06-

16 10:25:57)
Australia AJRimmer is online AJRimmerChessHere Gold Member(1398) Spring V

United Agreen85ChessHere Gold Member(1724)

Result: 1-0, Black Resign


1. d4 d5
2. Nc3 Nf6
3. Bf4 Nc6
4. e3 Bf5
5. Bd3 Bg6
6. Nf3 e6
7. e4 dxe4
8. Nxe4 Nxe4
9. O-O Nf6
10. Bxg6 hxg6
11. Bg5 Bd6
12. c4 Qd7
13. Re1 O-O-O
14. c5 Be7
15. Qa4 Nd5
16. Bxe7 Ncxe7
17. Qxa7 c6
18. Ne5 Qe8
19. Rac1 Nc7
20. Nc4 Ned5
21. Nd6+ Rxd6
22. cxd6 Nb5
23. Qa8+ Kd7
24. Qxb7+ Kd8
25. Rxc6 Qd7
26. Qb8+

Beat- I can't think of one
Brag- Forced him to resign
Variance- No screen shots as I am a chess fish.

PS- I can't imagine my rating ever being this high although I am currently studying a few opening moves so I don't get mated so quickly.

Last edited by Jnr Logical; 06-17-2011 at 07:01 AM. Reason: Typo
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
06-17-2011 , 07:40 AM
Hi and welcome. See the FAQ for posting instructions. Here is your game in a viewable format http://www.chessvideos.tv/chess-game...r.php?id=45964
Your first 12 moves were somewhat of a beat but after that lost the thread really badly while you played well 7.e4 just gave away material obviously and on move 12 he could have played 12.-Nxd4 (can you work out why?). Only one really glaring error in a game so not too bad.
*** Chess BBV *** Quote

      
m