Quote:
Originally Posted by Groggy
No one that follows a religion or believes in a God can prove of God's existence because there is no evidence.
There's some points to quibble here about the definition of evidence and its relationship to beliefs. You can see, for example, the
Belief and Knowledge thread in which it's noted that beliefs can be justifiably held without a particularly high standard of external empirical evidence. But there are other sentences to pick on which are far more entertaining.
Quote:
There is nothing you can say to avoid committing a logical fallacy, no where you can go with your circular reasoning, or belief that just because something is popular makes it true.
And you're going to supply an argument for this, right? Oh... you think it follows from the first sentence? This is what we call a
non sequitur. The inability to provide evidence for a claim does not imply that the claim is the result of circular reasoning (or some other logical fallacy) or some sort of popularity contest.
Quote:
Attempting to compare God to the electron is moronic at best.
Failing at reading comprehension is similarly moronic.
Quote:
It might at one point in time worked on you because you do not possess any critical thinking skills but what else could I expect in the religion forums?
You're right. I fail at critical thinking because I've properly analyzed your statements and pointed out the flaws. I've noted the failure of your original post to present a meaningful argument, and I've shown you that you've made factually incorrect claims in several places. I've further challenged you to provide support for claims, and this has led to more of the same.
You are clearly superior in your critical thinking skills because you keep posting.
What to expect from a religion forum? If you keep posting like this, you can expect to look silly.