http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVUU3p5iHMA

It's 26 minutes long. Cliffs? Points of discussion? Anything?

First paragraph of the description:

In other words it is conspiratarding

conspiratarding

be smart UM, get a pattent on this word before someone else does.

In before noober confirms everything in the OP.

My bad. It talks about hidden knowledge in the bible that is scientific in nature.

I was looking up yesterday how our cells give off sound and vibrate. So than I thought how this might relate to our "vibe" we give off and such. Than in the vid it talks about the ascended masters of our past who could move things around and what if we can learn how to control our vibration in our cells so that we neutralize the vibe to have the same frequency of the object we want to move so we are on the same wavelength of the object? lol So far I haven't been able to make my drink across the room float to me. But i will update.

8:20 is cool about someone singing mozart hooked up to some kleidascope machine and the shapes that come out are the same as ancient civilizations sacred geometry.

In the beginning it talks about how in the bible the "word" of God is scientific you just have to know how to read the bible and how it's really scientific in nature.

i wish i could take credit for it, but i can't. To be honest, I usually am one of those jerky politically correct people who gets mad when others use the word "******" negatively so I shouldn't really even be using it.

Does any of this amazing scientific knowledge get discovered in the bible BEFORE science discovered it? Can you think of why that might be the case?

idk but when i was small i loved balogna and cheese sandwiches and my mom and dad would make it for me with spicy mustard on it because that's what they ate in there era it was still good but i wished it was mayo.

yo its like this when the bible was written it was the infancy of the piscean age so the scientists who wrote the bible wrote down the truths as it relates to that era of time... if you look at the scientific revolution its cuz we were in the last quarter of the piscean age and the aquarius consciousness was taking over so we began question **** where as pisces is blind faith....

I just realized that starting a paragraph with 'yo' is a really good way to get me not to read it.

the bible to me is logic... adam and eve is saying how we are all salves to reproduction.. like adamn couldve had ANYTHING but he wanted some of eves "fruit"

Err, my Biblical chronology might be off, but Adam and Eve were told to be fruitful and multiply before the fall.

if u read it if i ever see you i will give you a bag of cheetoes

Alright, but they better be of the Flamin' Hot variety.

I always thought it was after.. could be wrong though. If I am that theory goes out the window

No doubt, I got you

I double checked, the "be fruitful and multiply" command was from Genesis 1 and the fall happened in Genesis 3. This makes you wonder, what would of happened if no one ate from the tree of knowledge of good and evil?

Unfortunately this is RGT which has somewhat......different....standards of evidence. But there is a useful rule in Politics:

it also says how eve tempted adam with the fruit.. insinuating she seduced him.. I feel maybe it was just reproduction before the tree of knowledge and more pleasure after.

Either way to me it makes sense that the first story in the bible would have to do with reproduction and how as humans that's basically our purpose. Adam was tempted by the fruit he was offered by Eve, and couldn't shake off that temptation even though he could have ANYthing he wanted... Althouhg replenishing the earth was mentioned in 128 like you said it didn't happen till after the fall.

Too much fluoride in their cool-aid.

Are there inconsistencies in speeling, grammer, capitlisation etc etc or am I just paranoid about leveling now?

im more of an idea person usually i let whatever girl im with handle the details.. imo women are better at such things.

think what u want.. but if u think what u want and i dont agree and we arent in a conversation than i wouldnt feel the need to respond. thats the difference.