Quote:
Originally Posted by Czech Rays
The astounding yet overlooked fact is that Hitchens, despite his great skills of oratory, is in the public eye at all. After all, he is famous for being an atheist.
This is a bit like being famous for saying the earth is spherical, or that smoking causes cancer. In all these things, we trust what trained and researched scientists conclude. And they concluded a long time ago that there is no god. All arguments for god are personal ones, and everyone is allowed his own personal view of how things are, but it certainly doesn't constitue any kind of scientific challenge.
The compelling reason for maintaining the pretence of belief is so as not to antagonise the status quo in societies (such as Saudi Arabia, Pakistan or the US) where being honest about god may affect your position in society. And while that is not 'fine', again people can say whatever they want to believe in.
But the facts don't change.
So why, I ask, is he so well known for stating the obvious in an admittedly charming and entertaining way? His point of view is already the scientifically accepted one, and he doesn't bring any new facts into play.
While I was only introduced to Hitchens through anti-theism, his decades long career was that of an [outspoken] socio-political journalist, and this was the way he approached religion. I don't recall him ever speaking with authority on science, beyond what a well-educated individual would be expected to know. His approach had always been that of a writer who had strong feelings about how humankind related to one another. I'm not even that knowledgeable about his career and works, but if you think Hitchens can be summarised as saying "God does not exist", you've completely miss the point.