Quote:
Originally Posted by LEMONZEST
The difference between humans and God is that God is 100% consistent.
If you read the bible you would know that is false.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LEMONZEST
B]Christianity is not asking people to have blind faith without questioning or reasoning.[/B]
I can find some quotes from the bible that would disagree with you. Additionally, what if my questioning and reasoning lead me to rejection of all of the versions of Christianity? Do I go to hell or heaven when I die, considering that my position will be of a nonbeliever. I find it quite ridiculous that the smartest being possible would base his decision of granting access to everlasting life on some rigged test. Because that's what it seems to be, a rigged test.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LEMONZEST
The whole point of Jesus' death was to pay the penalty for our sins.
So there is some imaginary scale that God created where sins need to be paid for. This sounds like some fantasy story about an angry volcano which is about to explode but if only we can sacrifice few valuables (preferably living beings) then the volcano will be happy again and won't erupt. Same goes with Christian story. There is some giant bucket into which all the sins are thrown into and the bucked is about to spill over but if you kill son of God all of the sudden the bucket will become infinitely big and will fit all the sins forever. This is so ridiculous.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LEMONZEST
Heaven is not boring
Can you tell me what do you imagine doing in heaven day after day? Because somehow I am unable to create a vision of heaven that would be free of paradoxes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LEMONZEST
I do believe there is empirical fact as well that support Christianity.
Care to present it to us?
Quote:
Originally Posted by LEMONZEST
The idea is if God forgave all our sins by sending Jesus to die for us then who are we to remain selfish?
God could have simply forgive all the sins, why murder his own son? What a dick move, he has magical abilities to simply wipe all the sins away because in reality there is nothing or nobody restricting him from doing so YET he creates this unnecessary suffering for his own son! Hey our economy sucks maybe Barrack Obama should kill his children so that we could fix the problem... brilliant solution right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by LEMONZEST
Marriage is a covenant created by God. God created people and knows how their relationships will work in a way that is best.
Yet he failed to predict that there will be homosexuals out there? Or did he know that they will. Can something exist in this universe without God's acceptance/approval/plan (whatever you call it)? In the sense that whatever exists and comes to exist in this Universe is already on God's list or does the Universe itself have a free will and things can happen against God's will? And since homosexuality is not a choice and it also occurs naturally in many other animals, did that come to be by God's approval or random chance God didn't anticipate to happen?
Quote:
Originally Posted by LEMONZEST
However the existence of the manuscripts does provide empirical evidence and a starting point for Christianity to be based in fact.
Not true. What it simply shows is that someone wrote the manuscripts and some of the information in it might be true and some might be false. Some we know is true some we know is false. When it comes to all of the supernatural claims in the Bible we don't have any evidence that they did actually happened.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LEMONZEST
But Jesus dying for everyones sin is not lame....Its epic.
No it's not epic , it's lame. God adds more unnecessary suffering. What is this obsession of your God with suffering? Why is he so into sadism and masochism?
Quote:
Originally Posted by LEMONZEST
The point is not also that you become a Christian and never sin again. These would be unrealistic. People turn to Christ because they know they need help. It is an admission of weakness. People have a problem with sin and guilt and Jesus offers the solution for that problem.
So as the good old Hitchens once said (I'm paraphrasing), according to your religion people are created sick and commanded to be well. That makes so much sense , right? You also said it's unrealistic for someone to never sin again. So when you go to heaven you will continue to sin? Or all of the sudden it will become realistic not to sin? Why wouldn't God skip the whole process and just create us in heaven? Why go through this dumb plan of suffering and pain? Oh wait, I know what you will say, it's a test to weed out weak characters right? Is God not aware at the moment of creating a human how he will turn out to be, yet even if he knows at the moment of creation that this individual will end up killing people and going to hell he still goes about creating him/she. Why? Is he restricted by some laws that tell him, hey if you are going to create a human you have to create him and let him live and end up in hell even if you are already aware of his future?
Quote:
Originally Posted by LEMONZEST
I believe God's commands are also for my good. For example God's command to be faithful to my wife.
Why do you cherry pick the commands that fit your life and your views? Are you currently sitting in clothing that is made of mixed fabrics? If so , then why are you not following the command that requests you not to mix fabrics. Oh is it because it would be too inconvenient for you? Going to stores and making sure that every piece of clothing you buy is made of one fabric, right? Tell me. Why would God even command such dumb stuff. What is it for him that people were clothing made of mixed fabric. Does it hurt his eyes? Does he have allergies?
Quote:
Originally Posted by LEMONZEST
I am aware I can't prove any of the miracles in the bible. We both know that. I do want people to be aware the Christianity is not "as laughable as any other religion".
How so? Your religion as other religions make silly unsupported claims, how does it make your religion less silly than others? Give me one reason why should I take your fantasy claims from your holy book more seriously than others?
Quote:
Originally Posted by LEMONZEST
I do think that the number of original manuscripts lends credibility to the truth of those documents.
Very general statement , care to elaborate on what documents and you talking about? And why should a claim in some document be more credible because it happens to be also written in another book by authors with the same agenda. So just because I can find 20 different creationist books which all claim that the earth is 10,000 years this claim is true?
Quote:
Originally Posted by LEMONZEST
To clarify what I meant by empirical fact:
There are New Testament manuscripts the can be observed (empirical) today. You could go find a copy of New Testament scripts in the British Museum. That is part of the basis of Christianity in fact and history.
I am not offering proof to all the claims in the bible. My point is that there is a basis for Christianity apart from blind faith and emotion.
False. There is a basis that the New Testament manuscript that was found actually exists but you cannot conclude that the supernatural or other natural claims made in them are actually true. How do you actually go into a conclusion that what is actually written in it is true because we found this book?
Quote:
Originally Posted by LEMONZEST
There are some historical facts around the resurrection but the virgin birth is a pure faith claim.
No there are no historical facts about the resurrection. Care to tell me what are those facts I am unaware of? And how you came to conclusion that these are actually facts?
Quote:
Originally Posted by LEMONZEST
In William Lane Craig's debate with Hitchens at Biola Craig brings up the fact that the tomb was empty. He claims this is a verifiable fact confirmed by other sources. If this is true then that would be interesting as well and shed some light on this miracle.
Huh??? Tomb was empty therefore resurrection happened? I know WLC is one dishonest person but you really buy into this silly argument? Don't you see the fallacy in the argument?
Quote:
Originally Posted by LEMONZEST
On the other hand being generous and honest are things that need to be learned.
Nonsense, there are plenty of studies that show that children under age of 1 already recognize fairness.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LEMONZEST
Supposing I discard Christianity what would I replace it with? Christianity provides context morally and historically. I have not found any other world view that provides a better context for living in the world.
What would you replace it with? Almost every few seconds you make some type of decision I'm quite sure 99% of those decisions have zero to do with your religious beliefs. Humans are naturally aware of many moral concepts and there is no need for 10+ commandments. Do you see atheist going around the streets of any city and murdering and pillaging ? Or are their morally based actions indistinguishable from Christians?
Last edited by gskowal; 08-30-2012 at 12:04 PM.