OH posted this quite a while back. It is interesting to read, and then to read the one that NR posted, then talkorigins had one responding to that, then trueorigin had another responding to that. I think that's as far as I got.
OH posted this quite a while back. It is interesting to read, and then to read the one that NR posted, then talkorigins had one responding to that, then trueorigin had another responding to that. I think that's as far as I got.
The rebuttal is linked on the first page of the article, I should have noted it...
You weren't even here last year for any of that. He constantly does this stuff over and over. He tells people to read things that he didn't, all the while acting as if he had read it and is an expert on the subject. He keeps presenting tired old worn-down sources and arguments as if he just found them and they were never refuted befor
You weren't even here last year for any of that. He constantly does this stuff over and over. He tells people to read things that he didn't, all the while acting as if he had read it and is an expert on the subject. He keeps presenting tired old worn-down sources and arguments as if he just found them and they were never refuted befor
EDIT: not worth it.
Well, I did read the rebuttal and both subsequent rebuttals. Am I allowed to comment?
Of course. You and I lost half our lives to that thread.
heh, sorry if this is old news. On the other hand there are a bunch of new posters and going over old ground has never been a problem in RGT so might as well kick it up again!
You weren't even here last year for any of that. He constantly does this stuff over and over. He tells people to read things that he didn't, all the while acting as if he had read it and is an expert on the subject. He keeps presenting tired old worn-down sources and arguments as if he just found them and they were never refuted befor
EDIT: not worth it.
Baloney. I said I hadn't read it and stated why I posted it. Once again, the one claiming dishonesty is the real fraud.