Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
29+ Evidences for Macroevolution 29+ Evidences for Macroevolution

01-05-2010 , 09:29 PM
Don't know if this has been posted before, but some may find it helpful:

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/
01-05-2010 , 10:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arouet
Don't know if this has been posted before, but some may find it helpful:

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/
I haven't read either document but in the interests of equal time:

http://www.trueorigin.org/theobald1a.asp
01-05-2010 , 11:04 PM
OH posted this quite a while back. It is interesting to read, and then to read the one that NR posted, then talkorigins had one responding to that, then trueorigin had another responding to that. I think that's as far as I got.
01-05-2010 , 11:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibninjas
OH posted this quite a while back. It is interesting to read, and then to read the one that NR posted, then talkorigins had one responding to that, then trueorigin had another responding to that. I think that's as far as I got.
The rebuttal is linked on the first page of the article, I should have noted it...
01-05-2010 , 11:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NotReady
I haven't read either document but in the interests of equal time:

http://www.trueorigin.org/theobald1a.asp
When people call you intellectually dishonest, this is what they mean.
01-06-2010 , 12:04 AM
You weren't even here last year for any of that. He constantly does this stuff over and over. He tells people to read things that he didn't, all the while acting as if he had read it and is an expert on the subject. He keeps presenting tired old worn-down sources and arguments as if he just found them and they were never refuted befor

EDIT: not worth it.
01-06-2010 , 12:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Our House
You weren't even here last year for any of that. He constantly does this stuff over and over. He tells people to read things that he didn't, all the while acting as if he had read it and is an expert on the subject. He keeps presenting tired old worn-down sources and arguments as if he just found them and they were never refuted befor

EDIT: not worth it.
Well, I did read the rebuttal and both subsequent rebuttals. Am I allowed to comment?
01-06-2010 , 12:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibninjas
Well, I did read the rebuttal and both subsequent rebuttals. Am I allowed to comment?
Of course. You and I lost half our lives to that thread.
01-06-2010 , 12:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Our House
Of course. You and I lost half our lives to that thread.
heh, sorry if this is old news. On the other hand there are a bunch of new posters and going over old ground has never been a problem in RGT so might as well kick it up again!
01-06-2010 , 12:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Our House
You weren't even here last year for any of that. He constantly does this stuff over and over. He tells people to read things that he didn't, all the while acting as if he had read it and is an expert on the subject. He keeps presenting tired old worn-down sources and arguments as if he just found them and they were never refuted befor

EDIT: not worth it.
Baloney. I said I hadn't read it and stated why I posted it. Once again, the one claiming dishonesty is the real fraud.
01-06-2010 , 12:34 AM
Gonna nip this spat in the bud....



Magic 8 ball says, try thread again later perhaps.

Last edited by ajmargarine; 01-06-2010 at 12:52 AM.
Closed Thread Subscribe
...

      
m