We really do seem to be getting on religion quite a lot lately. Personally I blame Kristy

That the Red Cross and Salvation Army have existed and been well-subscribed long enough to be overrun by corruption?

Side note: I had an English Prof for a writing class that was my crush/pen pal of sorts because Teacher's pet is my wheelhouse...in one e-mail he was discussing his frustration with dystopian universes in pulp fiction ...I had to look the word up...and now somehow the word is associated with him and thus sexy.

So, your post is tl:dr...but I'm gonna grade it as "hot." See me after class.

Your point is right and good....if everyone is intelligent and introspective. It overlooks the fact that far less than half the the world is even in your ballpark. Some folks are best designed for chanting and indoctrination, and that's ok. They're less than in one measure, but it doesn't invalidate the rest of their experience.

A whitewashed projection of your own abilities and the responsibilities associated with that skill set is over-simplified, and will not yield the best community results.

I would like to branch this discussion off into one about how lame it is that me and gf have been together 8+ years but due to the beliefs of the owner of my company I cannot add her my health insurance. Seems wasist to me.

Probably, I like religious people...even if I'm not in their club.

I see you've talked to my ex-girlfriends

And I would like to branch this discussion off into one about how if they changed that, the company would not have to offer certain types of birth control.

Harry Potter is the next jeebus. Book it

Avada kedavra!

Also, maybe they're just helping to make sure there is no long-haul for you to commit to?

Marriage is a non-religious legal state...why would they be forced to take care of some rando who is loosely associated with their employees penis?

Booked!! Can't wait to collect on this payment when I become the next jeebus.

Tis the same discussion really, they corporation is a human and it has rights gdi!

If it's a non-religious legal state then can I elope and be married but still not have to fork over half my **** when she decides to stop aforementioned penis relations?

Why should employers be the principal provider of health care at all - hmmmmmmmmmm

FFS you hippie! Who else is supposed to provide it!? The gubment? The people!? Maybe we could convince people churches are supposed to be the provider that way they can ensure care is to their liking and they can reap the profits tax free!!!

1. I hate ninja edits. Multipost ftw.
2. I don't see why the company owes you a whore. If she's a vital part of your existence to which you are committed for life ...there's a form you can fill out at a courthouse near you.

Ido, ldo


They shouldnt, it's a basic right.

Only got home at half 6 was watching on +1. Vixen gonna

There is clean **** all on TV from 7-9pm in the evenings. Antiques Roadshow it is.

I don't always ninja edit, but when I do it's substantial.

I should not have to register her substantial impact to my life with the government or anyone else...

So you're saying that a marriage license, which is statistically speaking a <50% shot of keeping her around is somehow important? Seems foolish iyam

i think that i should be in charge of all governments and religions. they should also give me all the money too. i will be responsible with it i promise.

And you're saying your company should put up tens of thousands on someone who provides nothing to their bottom line...

Which of us is being illogical?

after the chase it's netflix all night. Tv isn't even worth looking at.

Good enough for me. U for worldAdmin!

#BetterThanTrump

Illogical would be to expect they pay for her but not others, they pay for closely related penis acquaintances for everyone else because they are registered with the government.

Why is illogical to assume they could do the same thing for people without that one step?

I mean how is the wife of an operator who is basically a trained monkey assisting our bottom line? Oh right, she's not. Not to mention we don't intend to have children and they are pumping them out like the world has a human shortage. So the money risk is much less in my case.

They normally say that those who want to be in power are the people who shouldn't be in power, but I think with you that's not the case . You seem genuine and I'd vote for you.

Because you're not confident enough to bet half your stuff on her being vital to your well-being...and that's what they actually care about.

If you can't accept that I would like to bet half your house that I'm right about all future disagreements between us without putting up anything in return.

And I heretofore think you're wrong about everything you say, indiscriminately, until I own half your house.

Jesus man, don't you have any streaming/dvr/anything else?