I submit that people who are highly intolerant of those that have an increased tendency to behave immorally, are misguided.
For their intolerance to be justified two assumptions are necessary; 1 - free will exists; 2 - right and wrong are objective truths. Both of these assumptions violate the scientific consensus, which has mountains of evidence behind it (e.g., determinism and materialism).
Knowing this, are you more tolerant of immoral behavior, or do you believe that the suffering of others (as a result of immoral behavior) outweighs this knowledge and provides you with an imperative to be intolerant of them?
reading the stubenville thread is like suffering dental work without any pain medication and then afterwards electrocuting yourself over and over again .
reading the stubenville thread is like suffering dental work without any pain medication and then afterwards electrocuting yourself over and over again .
FWIW I'm currently pulling an all-nighter to do an entire semester's worth of programming "projects" just so I don't have to deal with this **** anymore.