http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/08/ma...anted=all&_r=0


I won't be playing it. I wish they'd come out with a six-max version.

I am playing one right now, and winning after about 1,000 hands this version was the2012 world champion, and it isn't busted because it called a check raise with 86 and got arunerruner fullhouse!

Sounds like you've gotten lots of volume in.

That is some bull**** that it ran the full house though

Just read the article. It's fascinating. Basically states in the long run that no human player can beat it. Even though Reed is beating it for $135 an hour they think that eventually he will end up loser. The scary part is the developers saying that they weakened the machine so that some players could win for some stretch of time but the machine will destroy everybody who plays if they continue. I would love to know the actual hold on the machines over tens of thousands of hours. It will vary but I'm curious if the machines are holding over 5%. As far as video poker, If a pro player plays 9/6 Jacks or Better the machine will return 99.54%. This means if the same player plays the machine indefinitely the casino will hold about 1/2% of the money wagered.

Just. Stacked it again if they can step the the power let em, these ideas machines can surpass the human mind ,and brain is as weak.as the good government ideas on poker they have. Iam winning 3 of 4 so they must start thier kick soon but on another note what can they do?