Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
HUHU NC/LC Thread for February! HUHU NC/LC Thread for February!

02-05-2010 , 11:18 PM
OMGOMGOMGOMG!!!!

I played PEEEEEKKKKKKKIIIIIIII for the first time today. Unfortunately, it was at 5/10 and he only played me for 21 hands. Luckily I took 30 bets from him.

[x] PEEEEEKIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII lived up to the hype imo.
02-05-2010 , 11:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjkidd
OMGOMGOMGOMG!!!!

I played PEEEEEKKKKKKKIIIIIIII for the first time today. Unfortunately, it was at 5/10 and he only played me for 21 hands. Luckily I took 30 bets from him.

[x] PEEEEEKIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII lived up to the hype imo.
VN congrats. I'm still awaiting my 1st match
02-06-2010 , 02:03 AM
PEEKKI ran really hot vs me

times I won 56
times I lost 93

he is up 13BBs
02-06-2010 , 02:13 AM
I did. 2p2 tells you not to post it. Mine's through deucescracked though. Just go to the website and click on blogs.
02-06-2010 , 02:56 AM
I believe you can write "blogging" in your location and then have the link in another line in your profile. I'm not certain though, especially if you're blogging at a direct competitor to two plus two, it's probably safest not to without explicit permission. But it's probably irrelevant anyway, I'm likely the only one who's interested who didn't know where your blog is.

edit: not to say that not many people would be interested, but that they would know that you're affiliated with DC and would know that is where you were blogging.
02-06-2010 , 09:07 PM
Gwaaag 4 tabling regs at 10-20 on Stars. Countdown to busto imo.

Also, Hermandil sitting out at 3 tables making the lobby look even more ridiculous. What a weirdo.
02-06-2010 , 09:33 PM
good old gwaag
will block herman

edit: see now when i block, the lobby looks good
gwaag would be okay imo if he wsn't such a massivo degen
02-07-2010 , 01:01 AM
gwaag still going at 3 tables of 20s and one of Ts
02-07-2010 , 05:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjkidd
I believe you can write "blogging" in your location and then have the link in another line in your profile.
This is true.
02-07-2010 , 06:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hood
gwaag still going at 3 tables of 20s and one of Ts
It tilts me super hard that you refer to limits by the big number, hood.

10-20 is 10, 5-10 is 5, 30-60 is 30.
02-07-2010 , 09:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheRail15
It tilts me super hard that you refer to limits by the big number, hood.

10-20 is 10, 5-10 is 5, 30-60 is 30.
Everything else we talk about is done in big bets, not big blinds (winrates, downswings, std. deviations, what have you), makes sense to refer to the game by the BB too.
02-07-2010 , 09:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hood
Everything else we talk about is done in big bets, not big blinds (winrates, downswings, std. deviations, what have you), makes sense to refer to the game by the BB too.
I don't make the rules.
02-07-2010 , 09:57 AM
I do.

I've been using the system with pretty much everyone when discussing privately, works like a charm. fwiw it's 6s and Ts, Ws (for twenties) is optional but after here it's mostly a numerical system, 30s, 40s.

Oh and there's also a standardized way of describing the state of a lobby. It's a ratio of games going to waiters, so "3:6 at the Ts right now" means "there are 3 games playing, and 6 people waiting, at the 5/10 limit.".

And just fyi, during the discovery stage of the standardization process i was a strong advocate of a fractional system (so 3/9 means 3 games out of 9 total) but was outvoted and the ratio system was the accepted standard, because 'the fractional system requires additional counting and/or summation'. Take that fwiw.
02-07-2010 , 10:05 AM
[QUOTE=Hood;16660392]I do.

I've been using the system with pretty much everyone when discussing privately, works like a charm. fwiw it's 6s and Ts, Ws (for twenties) is optional but after here it's mostly a numerical system, 30s, 40s.

Oh and there's also a standardized way of describing the state of a lobby. It's a ratio of games going to waiters, so "3:6 at the Ts right now" means "there are 3 games playing, and 6 people waiting, at the 5/10 limit.".

And just fyi, during the discovery stage of the standardization process i was a strong advocate of a fractional system (so 3/9 means 3 games out of 9 total) but was outvoted and the ratio system was the accepted standard, because 'the fractional system requires additional counting and/or summation'. Take that fw

your way sucks.
02-07-2010 , 10:19 AM
[QUOTE=OnTheRail15;16660457]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hood
I do.

I've been using the system with pretty much everyone when discussing privately, works like a charm. fwiw it's 6s and Ts, Ws (for twenties) is optional but after here it's mostly a numerical system, 30s, 40s.

Oh and there's also a standardized way of describing the state of a lobby. It's a ratio of games going to waiters, so "3:6 at the Ts right now" means "there are 3 games playing, and 6 people waiting, at the 5/10 limit.".

And just fyi, during the discovery stage of the standardization process i was a strong advocate of a fractional system (so 3/9 means 3 games out of 9 total) but was outvoted and the ratio system was the accepted standard, because 'the fractional system requires additional counting and/or summation'. Take that fw

your way sucks.
02-07-2010 , 10:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leader
This is true.
but he didn't write "blogging" in his profile. He wrote "bloggng". Totally different.
02-07-2010 , 10:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheRail15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hood
I do.

I've been using the system with pretty much everyone when discussing privately, works like a charm. fwiw it's 6s and Ts, Ws (for twenties) is optional but after here it's mostly a numerical system, 30s, 40s.

Oh and there's also a standardized way of describing the state of a lobby. It's a ratio of games going to waiters, so "3:6 at the Ts right now" means "there are 3 games playing, and 6 people waiting, at the 5/10 limit.".

And just fyi, during the discovery stage of the standardization process i was a strong advocate of a fractional system (so 3/9 means 3 games out of 9 total) but was outvoted and the ratio system was the accepted standard, because 'the fractional system requires additional counting and/or summation'. Take that fw
your way sucks.
So does your quoting.
02-07-2010 , 02:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hood
So does your quoting.
Mr. Rail is right. You use the lower number.
02-07-2010 , 03:09 PM
rail laying down the laws
02-07-2010 , 03:52 PM
I like Hood's way. Not even close, imo
02-07-2010 , 05:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hood
So does your quoting.
So does your face.
02-07-2010 , 06:09 PM
Hoods way is dumb. Its the lower number for sure.

Almost as much as when bk says he has the "Ten King", or the "Nine Jack", or the "Four Ace".

Its the "King Ten", the "Jack Nine" and the "Ace Four" ffs.
02-07-2010 , 06:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by hoppscot22
Hoods way is dumb. Its the lower number for sure.

Almost as much as when bk says he has the "Ten King", or the "Nine Jack", or the "Four Ace".

Its the "King Ten", the "Jack Nine" and the "Ace Four" ffs.
if hoppscot says it's something, it's that
02-07-2010 , 06:51 PM
How badly did I play this hand? Should I c/c river?

http://www.pokerhand.org/?5163535
02-07-2010 , 07:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by randomrules
How badly did I play this hand? Should I c/c river?

http://www.pokerhand.org/?5163535
poste it on the forum using http://poker-tools.flopturnriver.com/Hand-Converter.php

However I think you have to consider a c/f here

      
m