Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Las Vegas Poker Player Vlogs Las Vegas Poker Player Vlogs

03-23-2022 , 03:05 PM
It just says feedback is used for internal purposes. I don't think it has a real use yet other than telling the site admins what content we like and don't like.
Las Vegas Poker Player Vlogs Quote
03-23-2022 , 03:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Habman
So clicking the "thumbs down" icon makes the post disappear and reports it to admin?

Huh... now I know.

Not my intention.
I deleted some posts earlier. Probably was one of those.

Edit: It had nothing to do with whether anyone liked or disliked the posts. I don't see likes or dislikes as I'm still using the old skin and they don't show up.
Las Vegas Poker Player Vlogs Quote
03-23-2022 , 03:16 PM
Pman should pay Trooper for some tournament coaching.
Las Vegas Poker Player Vlogs Quote
03-23-2022 , 03:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pocket_zeros
You flop top set/nuts, someone leads into you and you say "I've got three players behind me and won't be slow playing" and proceed to raise. Was that meant to be self-effacing satire, or do you actually believe that was the right play?

As for folding middle boat in the PLO bomb pot and then folding bottom set on the turn in NLH on a three-flush board, you keep making the same over-tight folds. In our last discussion I suggested that you analyze your extreme risk aversion and work to plug that large leak in your game. Have you done any work towards that?
I fear I may be a victim of mistaken identity here.
Las Vegas Poker Player Vlogs Quote
03-23-2022 , 03:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Husker
I fear I may be a victim of mistaken identity here.
Yep, I thought I was replying to slow poker's post showcasing the video rather than your reply. My apologies.
Las Vegas Poker Player Vlogs Quote
03-23-2022 , 03:43 PM
GG Tim! I wonder what this near win will do to his WSOP staking package mark-up?
Las Vegas Poker Player Vlogs Quote
03-23-2022 , 03:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AzOther1
GG Tim! I wonder what this near win will do to his WSOP staking package mark-up?
2.0 min obv - maybe down to 1.5 in 25ks and up
Las Vegas Poker Player Vlogs Quote
03-23-2022 , 03:57 PM
And Pman will put together a .65 mark down package.
Las Vegas Poker Player Vlogs Quote
03-23-2022 , 04:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dream Crusher
Folding for $50 in that bomb pot on the turn is ****ing ridiculous.
I think you have to discount villains having the nuts on board 2 after the check-around, so I agree it's a weak fold. Of course the sets-turned-quads/FH that beat you weren't super strong on the flop so they might have checked assuming the straight was there. I do NOT think you want to call action on the flop due to worse implied odds and a worse hand.

The Q tends to get everyone thinking results-oriented of course.
Las Vegas Poker Player Vlogs Quote
03-23-2022 , 04:25 PM
congrats to the trooper for the decent little score on the tourney... he earned it and should have his moment in the sun even if its not a 5 or 6 figure score... the haters are gonna hate regardless.....
Las Vegas Poker Player Vlogs Quote
03-23-2022 , 04:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by marknfw
I don't see likes or dislikes as I'm still using the old skin and they don't show up.
let me help you with that


btw new skin can't multiquote nor shows location which makes rickroll very sad
Las Vegas Poker Player Vlogs Quote
03-23-2022 , 04:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasKK
congrats to the trooper for the decent little score on the tourney... he earned it and should have his moment in the sun even if its not a 5 or 6 figure score... the haters are gonna hate regardless.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickroll
let me help you with that


btw new skin can't multiquote nor shows location which makes rickroll very sad
New skin can multiquote. Location is missing though.
Las Vegas Poker Player Vlogs Quote
03-23-2022 , 04:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dream Crusher
New skin can multiquote. Location is missing though.
how?
Las Vegas Poker Player Vlogs Quote
03-23-2022 , 05:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Husker
Nice work again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasKK
OK.... you are clearly a professional at this editing & comedy gig thing..... that was the greatest poker vlog in history (you just guaranteed a win at that poker award show thing).... while your talents should be taken to higher places, thanks nonetheless for blessing us poker lowlifes with your genius editing and literally laugh out loud riffs.
I thank you.


Quote:
Originally Posted by gobbledygeek
Lol'ed a lot at the Slow Poker vlog, was going to award 10/10.

But was that 1 second of Nickelback at the very end? Re-ranked to 0/10.

Gfair,imoG
It was a risk I was more than willing to take.


Quote:
Originally Posted by pocket_zeros
As for folding middle boat in the PLO bomb pot and then folding bottom set on the turn in NLH on a three-flush board, you keep making the same over-tight folds. In our last discussion I suggested that you analyze your extreme risk aversion and work to plug that large leak in your game. Have you done any work towards that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dream Crusher
Folding for $50 in that bomb pot on the turn is ****ing ridiculous. In general, in these dealer change bomb pots players way overplay their hands. Sure we only 3rd nuts, but it's still pretty nutty. And I was thinking, what if we hit a queen on the other board and then BINK.

I play pretty conservative myself on bomb pots. I recently folded KKxx on a K54cc board when I knew the opponent had a flush on the other board. I also gave a grinder a hard time for playing 6322 super fast on a 663 board (other board was 854). He ended up losing $6k in that pot. I wouldn't even consider folding 55 in that spot from the vlog though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SplawnDarts
I think you have to discount villains having the nuts on board 2 after the check-around, so I agree it's a weak fold. Of course the sets-turned-quads/FH that beat you weren't super strong on the flop so they might have checked assuming the straight was there. I do NOT think you want to call action on the flop due to worse implied odds and a worse hand.
Here's what I just wrote on YouTube when someone said they’d get it in every time with QQ55 and that 66 wasn’t gonna be out there because of the six on the top flop:

--
I'm well aware that I'm in the minority in respectfully disagreeing. Your top-flop six point is smart, and one that dawned on me immediately after folding, because that flop was already dead to me (first-timer error), but still: as much as 66 and 33 were unlikely, I've seen online (and then in person at this meetup game) how people were spiking quads over quads and boat over boat all over the joint. More common in this game than a standard game. You say 99% but that's not the actual percentage. I don't KNOW the percentage, mind you, but it's not as "super unlikely" as you'd think.

A half hour later, the guy next to me pulled the same "getting it in there every time" that you just said with almost the same scenario and lost it all. Actually, WAS that you? If so, sorry for your loss.

So for my first time ever, since I've got nothing up top, I could end up either losing a massive pot, or chopping a relatively smaller pot. I'd rather fold and consider the ten preflop bucks as a cheap price to see how these things work.

My biggest mistake was forgetting the DNA of the two villains. If they were seasoned players, the fold would make more sense. Since they weren't, sticking around would have made far more sense.

But I'm fine with the fold. Small upside not strong enough to justify the massive downside potential.

Monsters are actually under Double-Board PLO Bomb Pot beds. I've seen them. Many times. They're spooky.
--


Quote:
Originally Posted by pocket_zeros
In our last discussion I suggested that you analyze your extreme risk aversion and work to plug that large leak in your game. Have you done any work towards that?
In vlog production time, weeks have elapsed between those hands. In reality, all the hands happened on the same trip eight weeks ago. So your advice, however well-meaning, could not have helped me for hands that long predated your post. But lend me your DeLorean and we're in business.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dream Crusher
And I was thinking, what if we hit a queen on the other board and then BINK.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SplawnDarts
The Q tends to get everyone thinking results-oriented of course.
That queen was so obnoxious. Rub it in, queen.


Quote:
Originally Posted by SplawnDarts
The flop raise on the first NLH hand is lighting money on fire though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pocket_zeros
You flop top set/nuts, someone leads into you and you say "I've got three players behind me and won't be slow playing" and proceed to raise. Was that meant to be self-effacing satire, or do you actually believe that was the right play?
Heads-up, I’m probably just flatting. Five ways in a single-raised pot where I’m the PFA, and people could certainly have hands like J9s, I’d rather build the pot, especially when BB thinks he’s got something. Knowing his hand now? Yeah, I wish I’d kept him on the hook. Oh well.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Habman


What's a "BOOB POT"?
I think you know.

Last edited by jrjrjr; 03-23-2022 at 05:10 PM.
Las Vegas Poker Player Vlogs Quote
03-23-2022 , 05:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickroll
let me help you with that


btw new skin can't multiquote nor shows location which makes rickroll very sad
That only shows if you are using the new 2+2 mobile-friendly skin. AFAIK the older default, slick, etc legacy skins do not have the like/dislike buttons yet.
Las Vegas Poker Player Vlogs Quote
03-23-2022 , 05:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrjrjr
Heads-up, I’m probably just flatting.
The fact that it's multi-way and you're so far ahead typically and the betting lead acts before you is why you have to call.

If any of 3 remaining villains attempts a squeeze, you're close to playing for stacks with a near-lock. If even one of them calls it has a similar pot bloating effect to raising, without showing strength or taking the betting lead. There's way too much good that can happen if you check to throw it away by raising on a hand where no one can have much (very few overpairs with that line, you have all the Ts, what can they have?).
Las Vegas Poker Player Vlogs Quote
03-23-2022 , 05:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrjrjr
In vlog production time, weeks have elapsed between those hands. In reality, all the hands happened on the same trip eight weeks ago. So your advice, however well-meaning, could not have helped me for hands that long predated your post. But lend me your DeLorean and we're in business.
Understood, thanks. Even if it couldn't apply to that vlog's hands have you thought about your extreme risk aversion and taken any steps to address it?


Quote:
Originally Posted by jrjrjr

Heads-up, I’m probably just flatting. Five ways in a single-raised pot where I’m the PFA, and people could certainly have hands like J9s, I’d rather build the pot, especially when BB thinks he’s got something. Knowing his hand now? Yeah, I wish I’d kept him on the hook. Oh well.
You build a pot by letting others enter it rather than pricing them out with an isolation raise. Your strategy relied on you being perfectly correct on a single hand you placed the bettor on while discounting the other three players' holdings. And even if your read on the bettor was correct it's still incorrect to raise there.
Las Vegas Poker Player Vlogs Quote
03-23-2022 , 06:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PLIKITYPLAK
Looks like Bran, Neeme, and Doug made the right decision after all purchasing that Poker club
Why
Las Vegas Poker Player Vlogs Quote
03-23-2022 , 06:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pocket_zeros
You build a pot by letting others enter it rather than pricing them out with an isolation raise. Your strategy relied on you being perfectly correct on a single hand you placed the bettor on while discounting the other three players' holdings. And even if your read on the bettor was correct it's still incorrect to raise there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SplawnDarts
The fact that it's multi-way and you're so far ahead typically and the betting lead acts before you is why you have to call.

If any of 3 remaining villains attempts a squeeze, you're close to playing for stacks with a near-lock. If even one of them calls it has a similar pot bloating effect to raising, without showing strength or taking the betting lead. There's way too much good that can happen if you check to throw it away by raising on a hand where no one can have much (very few overpairs with that line, you have all the Ts, what can they have?).
Good to know. Generally speaking, I prefer to juice the pot while a villain thinks he's in great shape, before a scare card kills my action, etc. - but I do see the value in staying coy.

I'm still relatively new to poker, so it's helpful to digest this stuff and see how it all works next time around.
Las Vegas Poker Player Vlogs Quote
03-23-2022 , 06:31 PM
Trooper can easily get away with a 2.0 markup for the Main Event. I would do so up to $500 because I know that is is a little positive EV.
Las Vegas Poker Player Vlogs Quote
03-23-2022 , 07:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dream Crusher
Pman should pay Trooper for some tournament coaching.
You know you suck at poker when you'd have to go on a Rampage style sun run to get to the level of Trooper.
Las Vegas Poker Player Vlogs Quote
03-23-2022 , 07:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fakekidpoker
Why
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Great news!<br><br>Two months after Texas Card House Dallas had its Certificate of Occupancy (COA) revoked, the poker room won an appeal with the Board of Adjustment (BOA) Tuesday by a 5-0 vote, meaning the card room can legally continue to operate.<a href="https://t.co/2i0X7k3Equ">https://t.co/2i0X7k3Equ</a> <a href="https://t.co/MQSGHRsM3O">pic.twitter.com/MQSGHRsM3O</a></p>&mdash; Chad Holloway (@ChadAHolloway) <a href="https://twitter.com/ChadAHolloway/status/1506752653610475520?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 23, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Las Vegas Poker Player Vlogs Quote
03-23-2022 , 07:54 PM
I guess you are trying to post this:

Las Vegas Poker Player Vlogs Quote
03-23-2022 , 08:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iwasbanned
Confirmed, the Moron (Trooper) didn't fill out his paperwork legibly, or possibly not correctly. The white card is not filled out in his vlog, thou he could of filled that out off camera. Maybe he didn't bag/pass the correct copies in? His last name on the bag is definitely not legible.
One guy can't do it correctly or maybe legibly, or both, and of course, it's the Trooper.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Langdon
Did not report is in the final 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmoney
Fitting troops new initials are DNR
Quote:
Originally Posted by Same_again
Probably to do with the white card.... on his vlog you can see he has written his name on the label on the bag. Can clearly read 'Timothy' and his hand writing seems fine!
https://youtu.be/EN-N4hChHvA?t=392

If you take a look at the 6:32 second mark, Trooper's last name is not legible. It looks like Datr to me. And the paper card in the bag looks white to me. It's suppose to be yellow. I can't tell if his name is on it? The White Copy goes to the dealer, yellow copy in the bag, player keeps the pink copy.

https://youtu.be/EN-N4hChHvA?t=392

How hard is it to print a legible W a t t s ???

Someone with a better laptop/monitor than mine, might be able to tell if he filled out the white paper with his name, is it white or yellow, or whether his last name is legible on the plastic bag.

So far, in all the 2 day events, Trooper was the only guy listed as "Did Not Report".

Timothy 'Did Not Report' Watts !
Las Vegas Poker Player Vlogs Quote
03-23-2022 , 09:07 PM
Afraid of The Man looking for taxes on them winnings LOL.

What a chump.
Las Vegas Poker Player Vlogs Quote

      
m