If only one wolf on a team remains, is the kill RB/Redirect etc. -able?
What happens when RB1 blocks RB2 who blocks player3?
What happens when RB1 blocks RB2 who blocks RB1 who performs an action on another player?
Are unsent NAs randed or not performed?
If player1 is RB's does he still 'visit' player2 that a tracker/watcher would see?
If there is a tie game is it flipped?
Do angels protect from poisons and other harmful actions besides vigs?

I'd like to have a table where mods can say how they handle unique events that could be ambiguous to the players if only for my own use by itself.

Any more suggestions?

randed NA

NK not blockable

Yes.
Player 3 is not RBed.
not performed unless I am subbing out the guy who didn't send, then I rand.
No.
Yes. Did this in Pirates.
Yes, of course.

I prefer randed NAs

Games are balanced under the assumption that they're always performed. I've had wolf team NKs not randed in the past and it broke the game pretty much

if it wasn't clear I am also looking for more situations in addition to opinions on correct modding

I think it's only really okay if the person says they're not able to send one in.

afaik most of these situations are thought of pre-game

in mystery mash, there was a lot of potential for strange situations to occur with roleblocks/randomizes etc. (what happens if a RB and randomizer target each other?)

The way I did it was I created a heirarchy of which actions would be performed. In the case of RB 1 targets RB 2 targets Player 3, since both are of the same hierarchy, the action would've been randed whose was performed first.

well part of it would have a table that the players can see what the mod decides pregame. Right now people always have these questions during the game for the mod that can be codified earlier.

seems like most of this is just stuff that you gotta figure out while designing your game

that obviously would not be acceptable in Mystery Mash when nobody knew their role

i heartily approve of this thread. i think there should be a handbook of pog mishmash mechanics conventions.

gimmicks should be allowed

i agree with soah on all this i think

yes that's the point

am I not explaining something correctly here?

Only if the wolf kill has been blockable/redirectable the whole game, requiring the wolf team to choose a player to perform the kill. There have been games that have been designed that way. Anything else is too inconsistent.

All blocks happen at the same time. Player 3 is roleblocked.

In most order of operations, role blocks happen first. Player 1's roleblock works but not his second activity.

I rand() only the wolf kill, because that not taking place is so game significant. If I am subbing a player out for inactivity and he is a seer, I will rand the peek for the replacement. Other than that, players are on their own. Also, I don't mess around. If I don't have a wolf kill in the morning I will try to contact a wolf team member before I rand() the kill. Then I will warn the wolf team that if I have to rand() a second kill, I'm including the wolves in the rand(). I've never had to follow through on that threat.

No.

Parity is a wolf win.

Yes.

well what would you have done in a game like PoG Corral where they flipped it then - can't just say you would have avoided it/parity wins it.

what's the rationale behind a tie having to be broken

i like the tie going to the wolves

What order do RBs and redirects fire?

P1 RBs P2. P2 redirects P1 to P3.

P1 RBs P2. P2 redirects P3 to P4.

One the RB would fire first IMO and not the other. Is this inconsistent?

usually a tie for the last lynch/kill

I am old school, so this may not fit what most new mods would rule, but imo, a tie vote on the ultimate vote is also a wolf win. For one thing, barring vote mechanics, the village should be able to avoid a tie on the last day by voting no lynch.

If there is a vote mechanic that comes into play like in MTG, well, the wolf has 2 votes and so does the village. That is parity. That is a wolf win.

i thought the whole point of parity during the day in werewolf is because in the day even in human form a W's power>a V's power therefore the w can simply reveal himself and overwhelm the V in the day

no joke

That's the philosophy. In games I have run with vote mechanics, the vote mechanics have either stopped at must lynch or it has been voting power that is counted for parity. With voting power to equal the village the wolf can open claim in the thread and the village can't lynch him.

RB first before redirect

in both cases P2's NA is RBed

tie goes to the serial killer for sure

I just make **** up as I go. I think it's best.