Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Pokerstars wishing to BAN winning regs at dons? Pokerstars wishing to BAN winning regs at dons?

05-29-2010 , 09:47 AM
Hi 2+2 community,

My account name is "Personal Atm" on Pokerstars. I used to be a regs at turbo dons (double up or nothing)50$ on Partypoker and changed onto Pokerstars officialy since february.
I changed because the traffic is higher on PS and easier to multi table(4-13 tables).

To give you an idea on how many hours I put into the game, I'm gonna put some stats
http://www.pokerprolabs.com/Personal...=1&w=240&h=180
Every falls is due to 88$ qualifier hyper turbos... and the rest is dons $50 and $100. I would be over 8000$ with only dons.

Now, I receive this email from Pokerstars:
Quote:
Hello XXXXXX,

Based on a routine review of your account which indicated unusual play
patterns, we have started a more detailed review of your account and play.
At this point we must ask that you provide us with some information that
will help us to resolve this issue.

First, please review the hands copied below and explain your strategy and
thinking during the play of the hands.

Next, please explain in detail, any relationship you have with the player
'flebotome'.

Your account privileges as well as any pending withdrawals have been
suspended pending the outcome of our review. Please respond fully and
completely within 48 hours. Your cooperation will help to bring the matter
to a close promptly.

Regards,

Lawrence
PokerStars Support Team

************************************************** *************************

> In the hand below, why did you fold preflop?

PokerStars Game #44040749482: Tournament #272478768, $50+$2 USD Hold'em No
Limit - Level IV (50/100) - 2010/05/13 15:37:42 ET
Table '272478768 1' 10-max Seat #7 is the button
Seat 1: AR6292S (1785 in chips)
Seat 2: Volk0909 (1770 in chips)
Seat 3: igor011180 (1515 in chips)
Seat 4: bina26 (1805 in chips)
Seat 5: Maybach49 (1820 in chips)
Seat 6: Alex-7-Drago (2300 in chips)
Seat 7: BarS Hunter (1365 in chips)
Seat 9: personal ATM (1725 in chips)
Seat 10: flebotome (915 in chips)
AR6292S: posts the ante 10
Volk0909: posts the ante 10
igor011180: posts the ante 10
bina26: posts the ante 10
Maybach49: posts the ante 10
Alex-7-Drago: posts the ante 10
BarS Hunter: posts the ante 10
personal ATM: posts the ante 10
flebotome: posts the ante 10
personal ATM: posts small blind 50
flebotome: posts big blind 100
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to personal ATM [Ac 4c]
AR6292S: folds
Volk0909: folds
igor011180: folds
bina26: folds
Maybach49: folds
Alex-7-Drago: folds
BarS Hunter: folds
personal ATM: folds
Uncalled bet (50) returned to flebotome
flebotome collected 190 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 190 | Rake 0
Seat 1: AR6292S folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 2: Volk0909 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: igor011180 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: bina26 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: Maybach49 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: Alex-7-Drago folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: BarS Hunter (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 9: personal ATM (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 10: flebotome (big blind) collected (190)

> In the hand below, why did you fold preflop?

PokerStars Game #43886090112: Tournament #271394159, $50+$2 USD Hold'em No
Limit - Level VI (100/200) - 2010/05/10 13:07:03 ET
Table '271394159 1' 10-max Seat #10 is the button
Seat 1: ljzaaa (1660 in chips)
Seat 3: jd1023 (1280 in chips)
Seat 5: Ringers00 (1595 in chips)
Seat 6: flebotome (3170 in chips)
Seat 7: horvyjoe (1855 in chips)
Seat 8: personal ATM (3520 in chips)
Seat 10: drokstate (1920 in chips)
ljzaaa: posts the ante 20
jd1023: posts the ante 20
Ringers00: posts the ante 20
flebotome: posts the ante 20
horvyjoe: posts the ante 20
personal ATM: posts the ante 20
drokstate: posts the ante 20
ljzaaa: posts small blind 100
jd1023: posts big blind 200
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to personal ATM [Ts Td]
Ringers00: folds
flebotome: raises 200 to 400
horvyjoe: folds
personal ATM: folds
drokstate: folds
ljzaaa: folds
jd1023: folds
Uncalled bet (200) returned to flebotome
flebotome collected 640 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 640 | Rake 0
Seat 1: ljzaaa (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: jd1023 (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 5: Ringers00 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: flebotome collected (640)
Seat 7: horvyjoe folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: personal ATM folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 10: drokstate (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Ok, routine check... This is already weird. Before receiving the email, they blocked my withdrawal privilege. I emailed them twice and the answers were both vague and they were asking to be patient and allow them to see what is going on. I received the email above 2 weeks later.

Here is my answer :
Quote:
Hi,

I hope this is just a misunderstanding because this is unreal and I am very
surprised and disappointed of the communication that you have proven until
this point. Thus, I will proceed by step.

First of all, I would like to clarify my relationship with the nickname
“flebotome”. It appears that I play with Flebotome as much as I play with
other regulars on my limit: $50+2 Double up or nothing (turbo). I can tell
you other people with whom I also have notes on such as:


-Daleroxxu,
-Deep_blue,
- Elcanalla,
- Eddyhh,
-Xyz( with numbers: 888 I think),
- Vectile,
- Bina(with numbers),
-Superking,
-Bars Hunter,
-Ljzaaa,
- Wlalex
-… etc

These guys, as well as “Flebotome” or “GoNoles”, are regulars on the same
limit and play tons of these sit and goes. Therefore, I have some notes on
them and there are some adjustments made when I have to play against those
players. To show you that, I will exactly tell you what goes through my mind
about the hands you asked me to explain.

The first one : the blinds are 50/100 antes 10. Good pot but I’m small
blind, and “Flebotome” is big blind. It is folded up to me and I also fold.
Why is that? Simply because at that point, I still have a good stack (over
the starting 1500) and Flebotome has a low stack and my readings on me say
that he 3bets/shoves pretty often with a simple A or a K in his hands
regarding the position and the stack he is/has. I have a small kicker and I
don’t want to put my tournament in jeopardy just for 190or 200 chips, I
think.

The second one : the blinds are more interesting: 300+180(antes). I am at
the cut off with pocket 10s and “Flebotome” is at a late position. I have
got a more-than comfortable stack and can see the game coming; he has also a
big stack. Therefore, it is more than an easy fold for me to let him play
because I do not want to battle for a big pot with an opponent that can
almost cover me knowing that he is a Regular/Tight. I would also have folded
JJ in my opinion. I would have just played QQ+ and maybe AKs but nothing
else.

In addition, most of the regulars have a blog or are part of the poker
community. I am a Deucescracked.com member and Flebotome too. He posted a
long time ago (in January or February, I do not remember) that he wanted to
play both the Sunday million and the warm-up the same Sunday but he did not
want to take all the expenses and asked to be stacked. I knew who he was
(because I played a bit at that time at the 50+2 sng dons) I checked his
tournament history and his stats and it appeared that he was a winning
player at tournaments so I gave it a shot. But since then, we just play at
the same tables.

Furthermore, I am stunned that you think there is a link just with him as it
could have been with anyone else. Even more with Elcanalla or Daleroxxu
because I talk about hands and tournaments on their blogs and I know more
about them because I follow their website.

Finally, I hope that you will reinstate quickly my account privileges. Every
day that I am not playing, I ‘lose’ or ‘do not make any money’ neither does
Pokerstars. As a reminder, for the past 3 months (according to my Tracker),
I have given to Pokerstars about $4600 of rake without counting the
tournaments and the cash game.

I hope that you will take everything I said into consideration and make a
positive decision. If you need any further information, do not hesitate to
contact me.

In hope to hear from you soon,

Best regards,

XXXXXX XXXXXXX
Their answer :
Quote:
Hello XXXXXX,

Thank you for your email.

We appreciate your prompt and detailed response. It will be taken into
account as we complete the review.

The review process can take several days as we must wait for all players to
respond and then the results of the initial review are sent to a peer group
to be confirmed. These procedures are in place to assure that the end
decision is fair to all involved.

Thank you for your patience.

Regards,

Lawrence
PokerStars Support Team
Their last email was the 22th of may. They said "several days" and still no answer.
What do you think would happen, be relevant to say or to do in order to get my account back. I can't play anymore and this is my "job". So I can't get no money anymore.

I have gone through other threads with nearly the same problem and they were all banned with no proof... That is why I am worrying about that.

ATM!
Pokerstars wishing to BAN winning regs at dons? Quote
05-29-2010 , 10:09 AM
I know but this is slightly different as they didn't ask me to explain my relationship with 20 people at least...
Pokerstars wishing to BAN winning regs at dons? Quote
05-29-2010 , 10:19 AM
I know this is hard advice to take, but try not to worry about it. There's nothing you can do now but wait.

By the way, "I have gone through other threads with nearly the same problem and they were all banned with no proof" is not accurate. Stars aren't banning without what they consider proof. They just don't release that proof to the player, for obvious reasons.

In the meantime, if this is your job, why aren't you now playing at another site? You should always have contingency plans in place, and you should always keep your cash on deposit somewhere close to the minimum for your playing requirements (you may need 100 buy-ins in your BR to cover risk of ruin, but you should *not* keep it all online.)
Pokerstars wishing to BAN winning regs at dons? Quote
05-29-2010 , 10:32 AM
Why has personal atms thread been moved in here? There are no links in Stars email with any of the names mentioned in the OP, and it's a recently opened investigation. Is he even Chinese?
Pokerstars wishing to BAN winning regs at dons? Quote
05-29-2010 , 10:37 AM
Not even, I'm from Belgium and living in spain for my part studies. And Yes, I am playing on another site but it is really worse (sorry for the other site). Taht is why I'm putting that much of energy to get back to Pokerstars.
Pokerstars wishing to BAN winning regs at dons? Quote
05-29-2010 , 10:42 AM
Personal ATM how do you manage to play 809 or your 2427 games on the site with flebotome if it's random? That is a third of your games over a 3-4 month period.

You have only played 71 games with me total in that period. Can you find any example of any other reg where you have played as many as 1/3 of your games with? It's not like flebotome is one of the high volume players, he's only got about 4000 games total on the site himself.
Pokerstars wishing to BAN winning regs at dons? Quote
05-29-2010 , 10:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Personal atm
I have gone through other threads with nearly the same problem and they were all banned with no proof... That is why I am worrying about that.

ATM!
I'm guessing you've just breezed through this one then and since you're experiencing this not really paying attention. There are some serious stuff going on here, but you might actually mean a lot of other ones?? I remember you though. Always liked your SN I only have 17 tournaments with you in April/ may 2010. None where you're playing together with "flebotome" and you're a whopping 4/17 in those. Couldn't see from the HH's that you're softplaying with any of the others either. 17 is by no meaning a sample size to discuss and especially since this flebotome is not in them, but if you're not guilty good luck with your case.

On the plus side, even if some regs might be getting upsetting mails from PS these days, at least it looks like they are looking into some of the DONS collusion problems... Gotta take the +++ from everything. And if someone is guilty - burn!!

Last edited by Alexnorge; 05-29-2010 at 10:47 AM. Reason: burn
Pokerstars wishing to BAN winning regs at dons? Quote
05-29-2010 , 10:47 AM
Their ROI together sucks tho so if they are trying to softplay for better profit they are doing a pretty horrible job at it, although it is very very possible to run massively under ev over a sample 800 SNGs.


Last edited by Daleroxxu; 05-29-2010 at 10:53 AM. Reason: spelling
Pokerstars wishing to BAN winning regs at dons? Quote
05-29-2010 , 11:03 AM
god if folding Axs and TT to a raise is cheating, nits everywhere better watch out.
Pokerstars wishing to BAN winning regs at dons? Quote
05-29-2010 , 11:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daleroxxu
Personal ATM how do you manage to play 809 or your 2427 games on the site with flebotome if it's random? That is a third of your games over a 3-4 month period.

You have only played 71 games with me total in that period. Can you find any example of any other reg where you have played as many as 1/3 of your games with? It's not like flebotome is one of the high volume players, he's only got about 4000 games total on the site himself.


Quote:
Their ROI together sucks tho so if they are trying to softplay for better profit they are doing a pretty horrible job at it
Pokerstars wishing to BAN winning regs at dons? Quote
05-29-2010 , 11:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Personal atm
Hi 2+2 community,
Now, I receive this email from Pokerstars:

> In the hand below, why did you fold preflop?
Would help to catch cheaters if Stars security understood how DoN works.
Those 2 hands are standard folds.
Pokerstars wishing to BAN winning regs at dons? Quote
05-29-2010 , 11:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d0nk3y
Would help to catch cheaters if Stars security understood how DoN works.
Those 2 hands are standard folds.
It's kind of tilting me to read those emails. If those are not falsified then lol. I had some donk just two nights ago report me, accusing me of chip dumping because I wouldn't call the short stack w/out a decent hand but kept putting the accuser all in when i was in SB and he was in BB (not a DON tho). I'm probably getting banned too.

EDIT: Not sticking up for anyone ITT. Cheaters should rot. Just sayin' those email hand histories are crazy standard plays I make daily.
Pokerstars wishing to BAN winning regs at dons? Quote
05-29-2010 , 11:35 AM
Looks like PS has some idea on how their customers should play. If you dont according to their guidelines, you risk losing your account and get your funds seized

Just lol.

Misclick and fold AA vs a reg can get your account closed.
Pokerstars wishing to BAN winning regs at dons? Quote
05-29-2010 , 11:37 AM
Eh, I hate to see this thread get hijacked because of those hand histories but I think PS security obviously has some issues too if those are how they came up with accusations of cheating.

Now I'm thinking back to the hands I've accidentally folded the last week or so while getting the hang of mass multi-tabling and using the xbox controller setup again. I remember for sure that I've folded 66, JJ, KK, timed out KK once, and I'm sure accidentally folded a bunch of other "playable" hands during the first week. I'd get behind and scroll through spamming fold so I could focus on tables close to the bubble and hit fold on those tables before I realized the hands I even had. Banhammer.

Last edited by prana; 05-29-2010 at 11:49 AM.
Pokerstars wishing to BAN winning regs at dons? Quote
05-29-2010 , 12:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daleroxxu
Personal ATM how do you manage to play 809 or your 2427 games on the site with flebotome if it's random? That is a third of your games over a 3-4 month period.

You have only played 71 games with me total in that period. Can you find any example of any other reg where you have played as many as 1/3 of your games with? It's not like flebotome is one of the high volume players, he's only got about 4000 games total on the site himself.

You don't think it's possible that 2 people play the same games and happen to grind similar hours without them being colluders?
Pokerstars wishing to BAN winning regs at dons? Quote
05-29-2010 , 12:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Langerdang
You don't think it's possible that 2 people play the same games and happen to grind similar hours without them being colluders?
Have you ever eaten a pulled pork sandwich in the morning, thats what its like
Pokerstars wishing to BAN winning regs at dons? Quote
05-29-2010 , 12:25 PM
^
i've no idea what you're talking about

I'm not saying they're not cheating btw,just that the fact they've played a lot of games together doesn't mean they are.
Pokerstars wishing to BAN winning regs at dons? Quote
05-29-2010 , 12:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Olden
Have you ever eaten a pulled pork sandwich in the morning, thats what its like
I am currently eating a pulled pork sandwich for breakfast at 10 AM...
Pokerstars wishing to BAN winning regs at dons? Quote
05-29-2010 , 12:32 PM
I cant possibly seeing stars send this email. My prediction: atm altered the hand histories to look standard.

If not then I'm losing more and more faith in stars. But 33% of games played with one player = red flag.
Pokerstars wishing to BAN winning regs at dons? Quote
05-29-2010 , 12:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Langerdang
^
i've no idea what you're talking about

I'm not saying they're not cheating btw,just that the fact they've played a lot of games together doesn't mean they are.
I understand I was using an analogy


Say, what if those guys were in the wrong and could not be brought to justice?
Pokerstars wishing to BAN winning regs at dons? Quote
05-29-2010 , 12:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedYeti
I am currently eating a pulled pork sandwich for breakfast at 10 AM...
Pokerstars wishing to BAN winning regs at dons? Quote
05-29-2010 , 12:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Langerdang
You don't think it's possible that 2 people play the same games and happen to grind similar hours without them being colluders?
There is almost zero chance that someone who plays 2400 games over a 3-4 month period plays 800 of those games with someone else that only has 4000 games on the site total simply by chance. They had to have made an effort to be in the same games together. It's already been said that OP knows the other player because he has staked him for sunday MTTs.

Ofcourse it's not against the rules to play with your friends in real money games. There has to be soft play involved. These players have worse results when they play together and the 2 hands posted arent enough evidence of softplay, infact the TT hand is totally justifiable, the ace rag bvb less so. Stars has all the hands though so they will be able to see if their overall strategy against each other involves playing softer against each other than they do against other players. Interesting how many times they bust each other on or near the bubble and what the hands are.

But why the hell play so many games with your friend, if you weren't planning to cheat? It raises red flags with stars and why have another good player taking up a seat that a fish could be filling?
Pokerstars wishing to BAN winning regs at dons? Quote
05-29-2010 , 12:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daleroxxu
Personal ATM how do you manage to play 809 or your 2427 games on the site with flebotome if it's random? That is a third of your games over a 3-4 month period.

You have only played 71 games with me total in that period. Can you find any example of any other reg where you have played as many as 1/3 of your games with? It's not like flebotome is one of the high volume players, he's only got about 4000 games total on the site himself.
I really don't think you need HH evidence with this type of history to shut these scammers down. One third of the games together should be a enough.
Pokerstars wishing to BAN winning regs at dons? Quote
05-29-2010 , 01:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daleroxxu
Their ROI together sucks tho so if they are trying to softplay for better profit they are doing a pretty horrible job at it, although it is very very possible to run massively under ev over a sample 800 SNGs.

I think their ROI apart is so high cos of some MTTs. If you look at SNG only head to heads they do do better together (6%/-1% apart, 13%/9% together), although only over 680 so not conclusive.

~31% of ATMs SNGs and ~half of ATMs MTTs appear to be with flebotome.

Is this a coincidence? (not that there is automatically something wrong with playing a lot of games with someone)
Pokerstars wishing to BAN winning regs at dons? Quote

      
m