Quote:
Originally Posted by chillrob
I am basically assuming that management is already charging poker players the maximum that can be sustained without an immediate decrease in business, so it would be unlikely to be increased further based on a decrease in their revenue from other sources.
Actually I think even the current rake is high enough that it is causing a decrease in their business in the long term, but the owners are so short-sighted that they don't realize it is happening, or don't care.
The DROP (it's not a rake, which is illegal) is $5, which is in line with CAZ and what many Vegas rooms were charging as a max until some rooms lowered it to $4. It's cheaper than Commerce ($6). So, it would be nice if it was still $4 but it's reasonable in comparison to Western rooms.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chillrob
I just hate seeing the total subversion of the intent behind the California gaming laws and optimistically hope that if thay business were cleaned up, things could be better for poker players, or at least not worse.
Not sure about the poker players, but certainly the CA game players. TBH I'm very surprised the city of San Jose has not brought the banhammer on the Corporation considering how active it's been in protecting the public lately. Like banning more than 20 straight hours in a cardroom without an 8 hour break.