View Single Post
Old 08-29-2020, 07:00 PM   #8
ecriture d'adulte
ecriture d'adulte's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,516
Re: The Coriolis Effect

Originally Posted by TimM View Post
Would it not be more fair to say that the distant galaxies simply reveal the non-rotating frame, and do not actually supply it? (or is supply to be meant in exactly this sense - perhaps a problem of language or translation)? Mach's statements are stronger, but in the end Mach had to be abandoned by Einstein.
That might be a better way to say it, I’m not an expert on the history but I thought Mach’s statements were not quantifiable mathematically so aren’t “in” general relativity the same way the equivalence principle is. Maybe your formulation is more accurate though.

But If distant stars reveal the non-rotating frame, what happens if the universe is rotating around a central point and you place a stationary planet there?

Last edited by ecriture d'adulte; 08-29-2020 at 07:25 PM.
ecriture d'adulte is online now   Reply With Quote