View Single Post
Old 08-30-2011, 11:43 AM   #62
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,152
Re: Lock Poker has questions to answer [ref girah scandal] (X post from NVG)

Because as far as the Bluff Poker Challenge was concerned, this was closure. That is what the statement was about, the challenge. There are player privacy issues, so except in this most recent extreme case, we don't issue statements about actions or potential actions taken against specific individual accounts. To the best of my knowledge this is pretty standard. I know I certainly wouldn't want a statement being issued that my play was being 'further looked into', potentially sparking speculation, then be cleared later.

Obviously in hindsight there are things we would change, but given the knowledge at that time saying we were 'deciding on future action' would have likely lead to speculation and is just unfair.


Originally Posted by raidalot View Post
If the audit wasn't complete why did Lock put out a statement which looked like closure on the matter? Why not say Jose is DQ'd (so no 2 can win the challenge) and Lock will decide on action against him once audit is complete?
LockRizen is offline