Quote:
Originally Posted by DougL
As clearly shown by saying it really often? Check out the interview on the ChicagoJoey podcast. Someone with a sponsorship was asked not to get into a public debate on a subject and the fact that he didn't get into said dialog was "proof" of guilt. Maybe he/they did break the ToS, but I don't think it was proven. I'd be slow to firmly state "Player X was a cheater", especially when the victim hasn't really agreed. Maybe there's a link to the thread where the principals had this out that I missed? Sure in the court of people who don't play nosebleed games, there is a camp where what you say has been firmly agreed.
The victim might not have agreed publicly, but I think it's fair to say that Hastings himself didn't deny it either. If I remember, I think he didn't hide it at the time, he was almost proud of it, like it was no big deal.