Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
PokerCast Episode 151 - Jay Rosenkrantz, US Poker Legislation & PokerStars Signs Isildur1 PokerCast Episode 151 - Jay Rosenkrantz, US Poker Legislation & PokerStars Signs Isildur1

12-08-2010 , 07:19 PM
$175.42 to cover sandwich and taxi expenses.
12-08-2010 , 07:21 PM
This refund of money within the 30 day period says about customer deposits being refunded, but I sure hope it means any money you got on the site. I never even deposited but have been able to withdraw from fulltilt, bodog, carbon, etc Would they ignore the players like me who got a bankroll going from freerolls?
12-08-2010 , 07:21 PM
$16.55
12-08-2010 , 07:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeShowdown
This refund of money within the 30 day period says about customer deposits being refunded, but I sure hope it means any money you got on the site. I never even deposited but have been able to withdraw from fulltilt, bodog, carbon, etc Would they ignore the players like me who got a bankroll going from freerolls?
No one knows anything for sure but I think it's safe to assume that any money you have in your FT or PS accounts will be safe regardless of how it got there.
12-08-2010 , 07:31 PM
I would like to point out that anyone with an avatar of a rival team in the Canucks division is automatically dq'd on general principle
12-08-2010 , 07:36 PM
$41.45
12-08-2010 , 07:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Johnson
Not so fast.
Whether you are for or against this bill, don't count any chickens too early on this one.
Frankly Im not even sure if Im happy or afraid :S
12-08-2010 , 07:38 PM
im still listening to the show now, but did i seriously just hear the guy from the PPA say that its constitutional for bills to get put together?

thats why poker players are screwd


edit: meaning that its ok to put a bill onto an issue that does not represent the law being passed e.g. UIGEA

Last edited by inthepub5; 12-08-2010 at 07:46 PM.
12-08-2010 , 07:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by adammclad
dont canadians use $1 bills? IDK

also steve you have created a monster

No, we use Loonies and Twonies.

Having listened to only half of the show, I have no idea what we are bidding on, so I offer $2, Canadian.
12-08-2010 , 07:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeShowdown
$26.36 !
how the **** would you evaluate a non-integer factorial??? lolololololololllllooollol
12-08-2010 , 08:08 PM
83.50
12-08-2010 , 08:10 PM
Rich Muny told us lots of things that were bad, I didn't hear any benefits/good things about the Bill.

Also, Bunner really sucks at birthdays.
12-08-2010 , 08:11 PM
$74.00
12-08-2010 , 08:11 PM
242 $
12-08-2010 , 08:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by inthepub5
im still listening to the show now, but did i seriously just hear the guy from the PPA say that its constitutional for bills to get put together?

thats why poker players are screwd


edit: meaning that its ok to put a bill onto an issue that does not represent the law being passed e.g. UIGEA
It is true. These attachments are called "Ear Marks". Otherwise known as Political Pork.

You didn't know your government does this?
12-08-2010 , 08:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 123phi
No, we use Loonies and Twonies.

Having listened to only half of the show, I have no idea what we are bidding on, so I offer $2, Canadian.
Oh shoot!

Hubby listened to the rest of the show, and told me I had to listen now!

I still don't know what we are bidding for, but I'd like to take my $2 Canadian back until I hear the terms of the offer.

I'm listening to the SS right now.......
12-08-2010 , 08:18 PM
50.50
12-08-2010 , 08:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 123phi
It is true. These attachments are called "Ear Marks". Otherwise known as Political Pork.

You didn't know your government does this?
from the UK
12-08-2010 , 08:24 PM
$35.80
12-08-2010 , 08:29 PM
$25
12-08-2010 , 08:39 PM
$19
12-08-2010 , 08:42 PM
i was gonna say about three fiddy but my answer is $66.50
12-08-2010 , 08:46 PM
$112.10
12-08-2010 , 08:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by inthepub5
from the UK
Ahh. Sorry.
12-08-2010 , 08:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamSchwartz
I would like to point out that anyone with an avatar of a rival team in the Canucks division is automatically dq'd on general principle
i moved a football team to Vancouver on madden

      
m