Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Pokercast 469 - Bill Perkins on Prop Bets, StreamBoat 2.0 & Mailbag! Pokercast 469 - Bill Perkins on Prop Bets, StreamBoat 2.0 & Mailbag!

08-11-2017 , 01:53 AM
Episode #469 - August 10th, 2017

Live from the Two Plus Two Studios
- This week on the Pokercast: The gang is all back together and Bill Perkins joins us! To begin: Adam has been away on his golf trip with the boys and updates us on his tour plus a night out with MJ. We also answer the question would Donald Trump be a good poker player? In the news this week: Australian senate bans online poker, the Hellmuth media tour, a poker player caught over-selling in the Main Event, numbers from the WSOP broadcasts are in and the largest live MTT outside of the States ran in the UK. We’ve also got some 140 or less and Mailbag including an ethics question and some comments for the show.
Bill Perkins is our feature interview as he joins us to talk about his various prop bets with Adam, the Staples brothers and Joe Ingram. Bill also imparts some life advice and gives us an insiders look at the insanely high stakes home games in LA.

Article on weight cutting from prop bet discussion

Click here to Listen On 2+2 Player

Direct Download mp3
08-11-2017 , 02:00 AM
Good timing!
08-11-2017 , 02:01 AM
69
08-11-2017 , 07:43 AM
If there are 5 aces in deck could be 6 or 7....
08-11-2017 , 07:45 AM
4st

In tennis, a successful challenge means you don't lose a challenge. If you know 100% a call is incorrect, challenging is GTO.
08-11-2017 , 08:11 AM
This is a pleasant surprise.
08-11-2017 , 03:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteBlow
4st

In tennis, a successful challenge means you don't lose a challenge. If you know 100% a call is incorrect, challenging is GTO.
Yeah but they almost never know if it was 100% wrong because a challenge is used on a really close call by the line judge, usually when the judge had a better view than the player. So using a challenge and being wrong early can be a huge cost later in the set when it's more important.

Last edited by PokercastRoss; 08-11-2017 at 10:40 PM.
08-11-2017 , 07:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokercastRoss
Yeah but they almost never know if it was 100% wrong because a challenge is used on a really close call by the line judge, usually when the judge had a better view than the player. So using a challenge and being wrong can be a huge cost later in the set when it's more important.
Eye witness testimony sucks though, so they may just be completely self convinced that they are correct.
08-12-2017 , 08:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokercastRoss
Yeah but they almost never know if it was 100% wrong because a challenge is used on a really close call by the line judge, usually when the judge had a better view than the player. So using a challenge and being wrong early can be a huge cost later in the set when it's more important.
A lot of the time, the challenge is called by a player because he has the better view.
08-15-2017 , 06:30 PM
Guys, "spaz" really isn't acceptable anywhere in North America in polite company. Not for a while.
08-15-2017 , 07:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by darrelplant
Guys, "spaz" really isn't acceptable anywhere in North America in polite company. Not for a while.
This is categorically false, not sure about other parts of NA but in my life I've never heard any North American ever categorize this word as offensive
08-16-2017 , 09:32 AM
That was M. Beauchemin's favourite word in Grade 8.
09-10-2017 , 07:34 AM
Love Terence's comment on how to fix Perkins' tilt -- play with other people's money

      
m