Hey guys, I'm getting absolutely brutalized in non-showdown pots. I'm not sure how to interpret these graphs/stats of my game, but if anyone can point out any major leaks here I'd appreciate it. I understand 30k is a small sample, but it's the only database I have atm, and I've always had this problem.

Unfiltered EV Graph:


Filtered to only hands in which I call/raise preflop:


General:


Position:

I think no need to worry about non-sd pots at nl100. If you really want to get your green line higher - value bet more lightly

donkaments your graph looks fine IMO. I've fiddled around with these lines heavily in the past few months and I can tell you that at 100NL you can get the green to be above the blue very easily, but IMO the play to have this is not optimal at 100NL. The higher you go up in limits the closer you should see your lines converge, or green go above blue because people become smarter (your value bets are getting called less, and you are winning more pots hopefully with bluffs etc.). At 100NL the vast majority of players, myself included, are knuckle draggers that pay off hands wayyyyyyy to lightly.

i know its a very very small sample, but its my first serious 10k hands of cash, and id like to improve after 10k hands and find leaks now rather than post a 50k hand graph. anything you could tell me would be awesome.

So I know it's an insignificant sample size, I'm just wondering if there's any obvious flaws/leaks that you guys might be able to point out in these stats, I feel like I'm too passive on the turn and river, either not firing dbl barrels etc enough and also missing out on value from weaker hands.
Also I play very tight out of the blinds, should I be loosening up?

punish, im not that good but i feel u shud open your button raising range a little. just my 2 cents

[QUOTE=punish15;4963517]So I know it's an insignificant sample size, I'm just wondering if there's any obvious flaws/leaks that you guys might be able to point out in these stats, I feel like I'm too passive on the turn and river, either not firing dbl barrels etc enough and also missing out on value from weaker hands.
Also I play very tight out of the blinds, should I be loosening up?

Solid TAG game

punish15,
your CCPF is very high compared to most winnerz... but, whatever works

How do I get a pic in here? Do I need to upload it to something?

Yes, you need to upload it to somewhere.

So I knew I was running bad but my run so far at NL100, NL200, and some NL100 HU...
Edit: I didn't realize after resizing you can't tell what the numbers are:

All-in Luck Graph

By madcow091 at 2008-07-13
SB = 6200. Actual < 4000

All-in Luck percentile: 5.9%

By madcow091 at 2008-07-13

At least it can't get any worse than this???

Just looking for general advice...

Thanks

ive had worse

=( Poker's a bitch sometimes. Edit: how low did your percentile get?

didnt check % but i was down alot of BI. Its gradually coming back tho I think

thanks for the heads up, what kind of % for CCPF do most solid winning players have?

1-3%

OK wow. I'm in the midst of a -13 bi downswing but things have been awful in general ... well, in the last 100k hands.
Here are some stats:

Hands: 103K
VPIP: 12.6
VPIP SB: 19.5
Fold blinds to steal: 87
Att to steal: 26
W$WSF: 36 (I'm TRYING to win more but it's haaaaard)
WTSD: 22
Won at SD: 53
PFR: 9.5
Agg factors (F/T/R/ Total) : 4.4, 2.4, 2.3 - total 2.9


Down $400. Jesus.
FWIW, my EV graph looks like the red and blue lines going up steadily (like up over 4.5K), while the green one... it's pretty much chilling down by the 0. That's ridic. I just don't know what I'm doing wrong. I must be getting bluffed like crazy.

LOL I knew someone had to be running good.

Looking at your by street aggression I get the feeling you are taking bet/fold lines a lot, and in a lot of cases this is fine. But it does allow you to get bluffed/semi-bluffed off your medium strength and marginal hands a lot more, it might be an idea to slow down with some of these hands and look to play more pot control, try to get them to showdown a bit more often. Having don't said that don't just start check-calling every time you hit top pair as the preflop aggressor, but consider taking that line occasionally. As far as everything else goes you look to have pretty solid stats, maybe you could loosen up a little but that's probably about it things will turn around.

Thanks for this. I've actually been thinking something similar to this first thought. I think I've been c-betting too much when it's not always the best line for value. It's an experiment though, and makes for a bit more "poker" when you give up the aggression. ie: sometimes you call down the nuts, sometimes they have air.
As fore loosening up... meh yea that could probably be helped by just stealing more and limping a bit more in sb. Maybe I've been getting less playable hands? Who knows.
These games with tons of limpers every hand makes it weird for me. So many multi- way pots with random donks out of position - so I've probably been erring on the side of folding given the looseness of the games.

Why is my red line so low. is it bad? (noob at graphs/pokertracker)

How far your red line is below the blue line indicates how much equity you gained (ie: how lucky you were) in the sample. The further below the blue line that the red line is, the luckier you were. At least your green line is right around the blue, though. That's a good thing, I think.

NOOOOOOOOO! This is not PokerEV graph, it is PokerTracker3 graph and this graph is FINE. Red line is non-SD winnings, blue line is showdown winnings and green line is total winnings (Blue+Red line).

And this graph shows that you are breaking even at showdown pots (still very small sample but in this sample) and its quite good compared with other NL100/NL200 players because most NL200- players (as me) are losers in non SD pots.

Also whats limits you are playing, you made 3k$ in 2.6k hands.

LOL at me be too drunk to read a legend.
Anyways, yea that's a good graph but small sample.