Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
**** Official Stats and Graphs Analysis thread **** **** Official Stats and Graphs Analysis thread ****

04-25-2009 , 04:40 AM
umm is std to have TP weak kicker + no draw to be super negative in HEM pluggin leaks #3??

I had a look and my losses there = my total profit for month
05-12-2009 , 10:37 PM
What is the standard range of wtsd%?
05-13-2009 , 05:24 PM
Just starting 100nl on FTP, how am I losing on the button? Any other comments/suggestions would be welcome. This is FR.




Last edited by slowcheetah1; 05-13-2009 at 05:25 PM. Reason: .
05-16-2009 , 09:02 AM
Id be happy with that red line tho, mine is 3bb negative
05-20-2009 , 12:26 PM
With such a small sample size you cant possibly draw any conclusions about the $$ won from each position.
05-20-2009 , 04:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingsimpson
With such a small sample size you cant possibly draw any conclusions about the $$ won from each position.
Don't suppose I can, more posting that to get commentary on VPIP/PFR in different positions. However, I just thought it was odd, its obv a small sample.
05-20-2009 , 04:54 PM
VPIP and PFR look completely standard for a TAG. Tight upfront and looser in late positions. I guess from looking at your stats you run at about 14/10 which is pretty average for a reg.
05-23-2009 , 03:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurs79
Id be happy with that red line tho, mine is 3bb negative
Is it even possible to have a positive red line at low stakes? He seems to be running at 8.5BB/100 when just starting out at the limit and playing ~14/10. I have to conclude he's running very well.
05-23-2009 , 12:38 PM
Over a much larger sample at 25 and 50nl my redline was still in the positive. I'm on my ltop, but I can post it up later. I'd have to agree that 8.5bb/100 is a bit hot at 100nl FR, but I would be very suprised if I can't sustain 6bb/100.

Last edited by slowcheetah1; 05-23-2009 at 12:38 PM. Reason: sp
05-27-2009 , 03:56 PM
i don't really know what these numbers mean in terms of what it says about my play...if i can get some help i'd appreciate it

05-31-2009 , 04:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zedveron
Ah okay, I didn't realise there were different graphs (I just found out about the ev ones) and thought there was something wrong with my graph because everybody else's red line was going up instead of breaking even. This is 400NL, I posted it here because there is no graph thread in the mid stakes forum.
LOL

Good work sir. That graph is solid. Hope you don't mind if I try to copy you.
06-08-2009 , 01:07 PM
using poker tracker, how do you put one of your graphs in a thread on here??
do i export it to another window and then save it somewhere??
06-10-2009 , 03:26 AM
Itsraining, how many hand samp[le is this over?
06-10-2009 , 11:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by IcarusJam
Itsraining, how many hand samp[le is this over?
those were over 25k hands or so iirc
06-11-2009 , 07:41 PM
So, I was thinking about moving up to 100NL, and I'd love if you guys could take a look at my stats from 50&25NL, to maybe identify some leaks. Thanks!

General stats:



Positional stats:



Graph:

06-14-2009 , 07:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by imfromsweden
So, I was thinking about moving up to 100NL, and I'd love if you guys could take a look at my stats from 50&25NL, to maybe identify some leaks. Thanks!
1) Keep running well.
2) Figure out how to play 3bet pots.
3) Figure out what you're doing in the blinds.
06-15-2009 , 04:30 AM
wat r decent loss from SB/BB
i know there've been threads but i cant seem to find em
over the last 200k im at

sb -11bb/100
bb -32bb/100

pretty concerning cos my BB $ lost = my $ won from B
ugh
06-15-2009 , 06:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wakeup
wat r decent loss from SB/BB
i know there've been threads but i cant seem to find em
over the last 200k im at

sb -11bb/100
bb -32bb/100

pretty concerning cos my BB $ lost = my $ won from B
ugh
hey, not positive but 90% sure bout this

-.15bb/hand from SB
and -.25bb/hand from BB
numbers equal too or less than this is pretty good

thoughts from other regs??
looks like u r doing well in SB but could work on the BB play maybe
my stats r -.13bb/hand from SB or 13bb/100 and
-.19bb/hand or -19bb/100 from BB over 110Khands

Last edited by giddieup12; 06-15-2009 at 06:50 PM. Reason: forgot something
06-16-2009 , 02:06 PM
What!? I'm losing 0.46 bb/100 in the BB
06-18-2009 , 11:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by imfromsweden
So, I was thinking about moving up to 100NL, and I'd love if you guys could take a look at my stats from 50&25NL, to maybe identify some leaks. Thanks!
Also find a good coach to give you 5-10hrs. moving from 50nl to 200nl+ would be a TON easier unless your "poker IQ" is already really high.
06-19-2009 , 07:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by imfromsweden
What!? I'm losing 0.46 bb/100 in the BB
hmm i seem to be losing 30.54bb/100 from the BB.
06-20-2009 , 01:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by achilles157
Also find a good coach to give you 5-10hrs. moving from 50nl to 200nl+ would be a TON easier unless your "poker IQ" is already really high.




Moving up to 200+ should be noooo problem
06-21-2009 , 07:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KurtSF
Having a pretty red line is over-rated imo.

Sure its cool, but certainly not necessary.



I remember this from the SNE pursuit thread... $4 pre guarantees a VPP if there's flop. $3.50 it'll have to be multiway or have further action. Small change, big difference.
Is this actually good advice? Assuming you win MOST of the pots where you are the preflop raiser and you get heads up to the flop... aren't you just winning more pots that are raked heavier? Probably doesn't increase profit at all when you consider this factor, no?
06-23-2009 , 08:57 AM
well the rake is somewhat linear while vpps are more discrete so if you have a $7.95 pot you are still raked $0.35 and get no vpp while if you have $8 pot there is $0.40 rake and you get 1 vpp which is worth well over $0.05
06-24-2009 , 05:12 AM
are you guys using in holdem manager the aggression frequency percentage or pt agression like 2.3 as an example. Which one is more accurate.

      
m