No f*ucking around with 1sts, 3ths, Happy New Years, or any of that shlt from me. Straight down to business:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perfection
ROM
re: your example for the guy with 80% RB
He goes from paying $100 rake total and after RB effectively paying $20 to paying $80 in rake and effectively $28.80
BUT that doesnt account for the extra $20 that stayed on the table in the pots he played to be won/lost. So if we assume hes a winning player then surely at least $10 of that would go to improving his WR - thus his bottom line of rake paid went from -$20 to at most -$18.80
So I think saying hes 'worse off' is a little incorrect.
PLUS, even if your numbers are to be taken at face value, Im pretty sure thats exactly what Stars are trying to do ie. give less money back to the SN/SNEs and more to the lower VIP levels. I dont think anyone has a right to say 'I want my RB% to remain the same.' The reason Im going to be sitting out is because its important that the total given back to everyone stays the same, which atm it isnt.
I'm quite sure what you're saying about the $20 doesn't make sense. Can you explain in more detail what you mean?
The change to wc rake takes from the rich and gives to the poor. By reducing the rake paid as well, this also does that. It's a double hit.