Obviously not a real HH.

If you guys think it's ok to stack off with a straight on a paired board in rush poker , good for u.... and welcome to my tables....

I'm speechless

jij has to be levelling

hey bob wanna play sc?

This. At first i thought he was legit, but the last few days he really just got greedy, IMO.

There is no chance he would be able to find the Internet if he was not leveling.

Gotta be, if folding a straight on an all low card board in a 4b pot is standard then welcome to my tables.

You're one of my favorite posters right now

I actually usually ch/f brick turns too. I mean we 4-bet preflop with the intention of taking it down or hitting a very well disguised trips or 2-pair. But we hit a straight. A disciplined poker player sticks to the plan no matter what and realizes that our plan was not to make a straight and he doesn't look like he is going to fold so we give it up and fold the hand. You can't lose what you don't put in the pot.

^ also important to note that vill is drawing very live even if we have the best hand for the moment (unlikely)

rush mountains

any of you scientists figure out why theres so many rush mountains? my only theory is 3 and 4bet pots are rigged

I think that the more overall hands you've played at FTP, the more ****ed you are in rush.

FWIW, I've also been thinking about the fact that if you're in a HU pot with someone, there aren't 7 other players sitting there watching you. I definitely think this changes how ppl play since they're not worried about having a bunch of other ppl see a stupid play.

i think a lot of people are not used to playing so many hands/hour and playing with so little time per decision, resulting in a lot of those people playing badly and tilting more easily. i'm especially talking about a lot of those who play >3-4 rush tables.

rush graphs are similar to a lot 24 tablers' graphs on Stars. low winrates with lots of swings. some people just aren't honest with themselves regarding how many hands/hour they can handle while still playing well. i'm not talking about you specifically - i have no idea how you play, i don't even know your SN.

i've played a good amount on both the regular tables and the rush tables on FTP, and i have every reason to believe that you should have a higher winrate and lesser swings at the rush tables.

Guess I shouldn't have played 700k hands of rush this year then

yeah theres no doubt that im not playing my A game when someones flatted my 4 bet and cracked aces for the 3rd time a session etc. theres def some tilt there. the crazy thing about rush is i seem to get out flopped in 3/ 4bet pots a ridic amount, run kk in to AA, and get overset at least twice per session. i realize its not rigged but its really painful and obv causes tilt.

im not sold on the hands/hr theory (at least for me anyways) because im never really in a rush. i mean im not trying to play faster to get more hands in and i feel i have as much or more time 4 tabling rush than 12 tabling reg. all i know is im ready to put some epic everest-like structure at the end of that graph..... anytime now.......

vertical rush graph please

no

yes!

why?

agreed

The last two-thirds is vertical. Does it count?



Uploaded with ImageShack.us

this has less than 1/10 of the requested sample size. do not be surprised if mountains are formed in your future.

This might be the dumbest thing I've ever read. Congratulations!

errr .. ugh if you really .. took that seriously, ugh i give up

HERE DIS 4 U FRAND

Post same data as a buy in graph please.
35k hands of vertical is a fairly small sample size.

if he has a hard time deciding between you leveling and you being an idiot, that might say more about you than it does about him.