*** Non-Official Rush Poker Regulars Thread*** (NSFW)
10-28-2010
, 12:25 AM
10-28-2010
, 12:34 AM
hummm that's a hard one to answer actually, let me give it a try
1/ I understood he was a cheater , but
2/ mmm.... It seems you did too, so that is irrelevant....
3/
.
..
oooooh i got it
3/ I took the time to answer you ---> yes, I must be ******ed
Ok, you could argue that following that reasonning, you must be ******ed aswell - and that couldn't be, right ?
But given my hourly, I really must be ******ed ;
And, assuming you're a losing player, it could actually be a very smart move to spend your time writting insults rather than losing money.
But i'm sure you'll come soon enough saying you crush the games, blah blah.... so i'm definetily lost....
oups - that's normal , i'm ******ed
edit : wanna fight on tables ? you'll find me at 5nl rush
1/ I understood he was a cheater , but
2/ mmm.... It seems you did too, so that is irrelevant....
3/
.
..
oooooh i got it
3/ I took the time to answer you ---> yes, I must be ******ed
Ok, you could argue that following that reasonning, you must be ******ed aswell - and that couldn't be, right ?
But given my hourly, I really must be ******ed ;
And, assuming you're a losing player, it could actually be a very smart move to spend your time writting insults rather than losing money.
But i'm sure you'll come soon enough saying you crush the games, blah blah.... so i'm definetily lost....
oups - that's normal , i'm ******ed
edit : wanna fight on tables ? you'll find me at 5nl rush
10-28-2010
, 12:37 AM
Quote:
hummm that's a hard one to answer actually, let me give it a try
1/ I understood he was a cheater , but
2/ mmm.... It seems you did too, so that is irrelevant....
3/
.
..
oooooh i got it
3/ I took the time to answer you ---> yes, I must be ******ed
Ok, you could argue that following that reasonning, you must be ******ed aswell - and that couldn't be, right ?
But given my hourly, I really must be ******ed ;
And, assuming you're a losing player, it could actually be a very smart move to spend your time writting insults rather than losing money.
But i'm sure you'll come soon enough saying you crush the games, blah blah.... so i'm definetily lost....
oups - that's normal , i'm ******ed
1/ I understood he was a cheater , but
2/ mmm.... It seems you did too, so that is irrelevant....
3/
.
..
oooooh i got it
3/ I took the time to answer you ---> yes, I must be ******ed
Ok, you could argue that following that reasonning, you must be ******ed aswell - and that couldn't be, right ?
But given my hourly, I really must be ******ed ;
And, assuming you're a losing player, it could actually be a very smart move to spend your time writting insults rather than losing money.
But i'm sure you'll come soon enough saying you crush the games, blah blah.... so i'm definetily lost....
oups - that's normal , i'm ******ed
10-28-2010
, 01:10 AM
10-28-2010
, 01:18 AM
Quote:
I'm being 100% serious 3-bet/call KQ can be 100% fine and almost standard against the right opponent in the right situation. Apparently you're a huge nit though so probably not the case for you and opponent was probably just ****** aggro-monkey who never learned not to pay off nits and just wants to win every pot but I was just saying based more on the tone of your post instead of thinking about stuff you're just like "lol 2p2 told me this was bad and he does it he must be bad". I should probably quit tapping the tank now though...
10-28-2010
, 02:10 AM
10-28-2010
, 02:30 AM
10-28-2010
, 02:36 AM
10-28-2010
, 02:54 AM
10-28-2010
, 02:56 AM
10-28-2010
, 02:59 AM
i have no idea who you are