Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
*** Non-Official Rush Poker Regulars Thread*** (NSFW) *** Non-Official Rush Poker Regulars Thread*** (NSFW)

11-12-2010 , 08:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedle
dont outlevel yourself, his reasoning is "well, since my word counts for ****, I'm freerolling no matter how much I offer because I'm never going to pay"
not a freeroll if you value your reputation

besides the fact that it would be scummy, soiling your 2+2/poker reputation for $500 (or soiling your reputation just to see a hand, depending on how you view it) would be a pretty damn stupid investment for anyone known as a reg

that being said, even though it seems likely he wouldn't have paid up even if he got shown in-game, we don't know for sure. it's just reasonable enough of a "loophole" that i personally am giving him the benefit of the doubt. actually...

standouts: i don't think you've explicitly stated this one way or the other. are you claiming that you actually would have sent him $500 if he turned off auto-muck and showed the hand in-game? just wondering what you're claiming...
11-12-2010 , 09:56 PM
goal for the night is to find a way to manage to win one pot, seemingly impossible task so far
11-12-2010 , 10:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SA16
goal for the night is to find a way to manage to win one pot, seemingly impossible task so far
Had the same problem. Finally flopped TP, AK on a K38 board.
and obv some 2+2 reg makes tiny bets on both turn and river in a 3way pot after calling flop Cb.
Needless to say what he was holding

Spoiler:
needless to say I payed it off cause I haz toppest pair ffs
11-12-2010 , 10:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SA16
goal for the night is to find a way to manage to win one pot, seemingly impossible task so far
amen. i feel like i set the new record for lowest % of pots won in 1k hands, obv very few hands, but frustrating enough. today 0% sets, made top pair or better maybe 3 times (best hand flopped was TPTK which i of course lost with), 20% cbet success (lol), 28% won when saw flop (lol), etc. etc.

again very few hands but holy craaap bleeding 2 buy-ins away $3-$10 at a time is so little fun
11-12-2010 , 11:41 PM
Cbet success tends to suck arse in rush from what I've seen (or maybe it's just me) Am I right in assuming that that'd also translate into lower WWSF% compared to regular speed tables?
11-12-2010 , 11:44 PM
Typically, yes.

Currently cracking up at the sn xRaised By Jewsx playing 200 right now. Superb name.
11-12-2010 , 11:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fieldyb
Ypky, let it go. Obviously this guy is all talk. But when it comes to putting it on the line, he shrivels up. It's ok not to pay. But at least man up to the fact that u were talking ****. The way you are approaching this is sooo sad.
I have no idea what your talking about this comment makes no sense? Shriveling up? I am talking aren't I? I am not sure what your definition of shriveling up is , but I won't think it would be not responding sir.

Quote:
Originally Posted by blankoblanco
not a freeroll if you value your reputation

besides the fact that it would be scummy, soiling your 2+2/poker reputation for $500 (or soiling your reputation just to see a hand, depending on how you view it) would be a pretty damn stupid investment for anyone known as a reg

that being said, even though it seems likely he wouldn't have paid up even if he got shown in-game, we don't know for sure. it's just reasonable enough of a "loophole" that i personally am giving him the benefit of the doubt. actually...

standouts: i don't think you've explicitly stated this one way or the other. are you claiming that you actually would have sent him $500 if he turned off auto-muck and showed the hand in-game? just wondering what you're claiming...
I have no idea why my "reputation" is on the line for something that I have no clue why I should pay? I asked him to show, clearly meaning right then and there, and it didn't happen. You guys can try to pressure me into having to pay something that in no way shape or form I should have to, but as I said its not happening because I didn't get what I asked for. If he shows on the spot then you can try to flame me, but I have no reason what this is all about. Seems like a lot of ignorant people IMO.
11-13-2010 , 12:09 AM
i guess you misread what i was saying. i was saying it's not a freeroll for you because if he HAD shown in-game, you'd either have to pay or be considered scummy. he didn't show in-game though, so you got off that hook

but you ignored my question. are you claiming you would have paid him $500 if he showed the hand in-game or not? because if you wouldn't have, then your whole argument is kind of moot and you should just say you were mouthing off and your word isn't worth anything. youre being evasive enough about this point that i'm pretty convinced you were just mouthing off and are lucky that you have a loophole that gives you a leg to stand on. lame if that's the case, but whatever
11-13-2010 , 12:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by blankoblanco
i guess you misread what i was saying. i was saying it's not a freeroll for you because if he HAD shown in-game, you'd either have to pay or be considered scummy. he didn't show in-game though, so you got off that hook

but you ignored my question. are you claiming you would have paid him $500 if he showed the hand in-game or not? because if you wouldn't have, then your whole argument is kind of moot and you should just say you were mouthing off and your word isn't worth anything. youre being evasive enough about this point that i'm pretty convinced you were just mouthing off and are lucky that you have a loophole that gives you a leg to stand on. lame if that's the case, but whatever
The point is he didn't show, so Standouts reputation is fine and should not be blemished in the slightest. This only comes into question if he had shown and standouts had welched on the bet and subsequently his word - If that was the case then I as much as anybody would be calling him out on it but because that isn't the case then we need to let him be.

Yes, his approach and replies in this thread could have been better but at the same time he's done absolutely nothing wrong, nor could he have and people need to recognize that, let it go, and move on.
11-13-2010 , 12:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedle
trash talking or not, your word is on the line here, ship him his money
I think it's pretty clear that standouts was implying in real time and that he wouldn't offer that money to be shown the results in a thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AgressiveDog
i like how standouts reply and act like he didnt say anything about the 500$
Unfortunately this but initially he probably didn't know how to react and this was the solution he thought would work in the meantime.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WildBobAA
cool story bro, now ship him the monies
Why? See my earlier posts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jij452
looooool How anybody could be stupid enough to jam there with top set.

Stupid bet,.... but that was a bet
Same again.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xplore111
He showed you a screenie of in-game cards, how is that not legit enough?
Do you honestly believe this was the implied terms of standouts statement? I don't see how you're drawing that conclusion from the words: "show me something other then QQ" said in realtime at a poker table. If this was live poker and the opponent didn't show in realtime but had a way to prove results later (even irrefutably) would you still be arguing for what you're arguing for here?


Quote:
Originally Posted by WildBobAA
pathetic
No u

Seriously, this post acts as if standouts is clearly in the wrong. I disagree with that outcome.

Quote:
Originally Posted by H0NEY BADGER
fwiw if i was in that situation id have taken it to mean "show me right now." if you turn off automuck and show then you're owed 500. but like blanko said alot of the gratification of it is in the moment. posting in some thread just isnt the same as doing it at the table imo
Exactly this. How people think it can even remotely be accepted as wrong for him not to ship is beyond me. All it takes is a quick CTRL+M.
11-13-2010 , 12:36 AM
Thanks for some sort of reasoning here skelm as I really dont know where all this hate is coming from. I have never done anyone wrong in these threads and I really don't understand the fact that I am getting pushed on for paying up on something that I never received. Not much else to say I feel like crap tonight going to try to sleep if I can. Sucks missing out on a great night to play.
11-13-2010 , 02:37 AM
guess what hand villain has

Full Tilt Poker $0.50/$1 No Limit Hold'em - 9 players
The Official 2+2 Hand Converter By DeucesCracked Poker Videos

MP1: $132.00
MP2: $50.00
CO: $120.65
Hero (BTN): $145.90
SB: $99.00
BB: $41.65
UTG: $214.50
UTG+1: $520.00
UTG+2: $74.30

Pre Flop: ($1.50) Hero is BTN with 7 7
1 fold, UTG+1 raises to $3, 1 fold, MP1 calls $3, MP2 calls $3, CO calls $3, Hero calls $3, 2 folds

Flop: ($16.50) 5 7 Q (5 players)
UTG+1 checks, MP1 checks, MP2 checks, CO checks, Hero checks

Turn: ($16.50) Q (5 players)
UTG+1 bets $11, MP1 requests TIME, MP1 folds, MP2 folds, CO folds, Hero raises to $30, UTG+1 calls $19

River: ($76.50) T (2 players)
UTG+1 checks, Hero bets $112.90 all in, UTG+1 requests TIME, UTG+1 calls $112.90

Spoiler:
Final Pot: $302.30
Hero shows 7d 7c (a full house, Sevens full of Queens)
UTG+1 mucks Js Jd
Hero wins $299.30
(Rake: $3.00)
11-13-2010 , 03:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by YippeeKaeYay
Typically, yes.

Currently cracking up at the sn xRaised By Jewsx playing 200 right now. Superb name.
Almost as good as xxHymenxCrusherx
11-13-2010 , 03:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by xplore111
guess what hand villain has

Full Tilt Poker $0.50/$1 No Limit Hold'em - 9 players
The Official 2+2 Hand Converter By DeucesCracked Poker Videos

MP1: $132.00
MP2: $50.00
CO: $120.65
Hero (BTN): $145.90
SB: $99.00
BB: $41.65
UTG: $214.50
UTG+1: $520.00
UTG+2: $74.30

Pre Flop: ($1.50) Hero is BTN with 7 7
1 fold, UTG+1 raises to $3, 1 fold, MP1 calls $3, MP2 calls $3, CO calls $3, Hero calls $3, 2 folds

Flop: ($16.50) 5 7 Q (5 players)
UTG+1 checks, MP1 checks, MP2 checks, CO checks, Hero checks

Turn: ($16.50) Q (5 players)
UTG+1 bets $11, MP1 requests TIME, MP1 folds, MP2 folds, CO folds, Hero raises to $30, UTG+1 calls $19

River: ($76.50) T (2 players)
UTG+1 checks, Hero bets $112.90 all in, UTG+1 requests TIME, UTG+1 calls $112.90

Spoiler:
Final Pot: $302.30
Hero shows 7d 7c (a full house, Sevens full of Queens)
UTG+1 mucks Js Jd
Hero wins $299.30
(Rake: $3.00)
a 3 day ban please? honestly dude you are getting so annoying with your bad beat hands and then when someone else posts any std hand you try to act like a douche while you are contradicting yourself and do the exactly same thing. At least add a pic or something if you are going to post this crap.
11-13-2010 , 04:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by luvinurmoney
a 3 day ban please? honestly dude you are getting so annoying with your bad beat hands and then when someone else posts any std hand you try to act like a douche while you are contradicting yourself and do the exactly same thing. At least add a pic or something if you are going to post this crap.
hehe

BTW last night u offered me $1 to see my hole cards. now u just start donking the river for $1 to get to SD? lol'ed pretty hard though
11-13-2010 , 04:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by xplore111
guess what hand villain has

Full Tilt Poker $0.50/$1 No Limit Hold'em - 9 players
The Official 2+2 Hand Converter By DeucesCracked Poker Videos

MP1: $132.00
MP2: $50.00
CO: $120.65
Hero (BTN): $145.90
SB: $99.00
BB: $41.65
UTG: $214.50
UTG+1: $520.00
UTG+2: $74.30

Pre Flop: ($1.50) Hero is BTN with 7 7
1 fold, UTG+1 raises to $3, 1 fold, MP1 calls $3, MP2 calls $3, CO calls $3, Hero calls $3, 2 folds

Flop: ($16.50) 5 7 Q (5 players)
UTG+1 checks, MP1 checks, MP2 checks, CO checks, Hero checks

Turn: ($16.50) Q (5 players)
UTG+1 bets $11, MP1 requests TIME, MP1 folds, MP2 folds, CO folds, Hero raises to $30, UTG+1 calls $19

River: ($76.50) T (2 players)
UTG+1 checks, Hero bets $112.90 all in, UTG+1 requests TIME, UTG+1 calls $112.90

Spoiler:
Final Pot: $302.30
Hero shows 7d 7c (a full house, Sevens full of Queens)
UTG+1 mucks Js Jd
Hero wins $299.30
(Rake: $3.00)
Why is this hand even remotely interesting? If you're going to post this trash, post some smut too.
11-13-2010 , 04:58 AM
WE THE PEOPLE DEMAND SMUT!
11-13-2010 , 08:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SnWhy
hehe

BTW last night u offered me $1 to see my hole cards. now u just start donking the river for $1 to get to SD? lol'ed pretty hard though
You know his sn?
11-13-2010 , 09:12 AM
Hmmmyourchips would make sense. Good guess?
11-13-2010 , 09:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SnWhy
hehe

BTW last night u offered me $1 to see my hole cards. now u just start donking the river for $1 to get to SD? lol'ed pretty hard though
This is awesome.

Oh, and MMmmm your chips is not whoever you think it is ;-)

Thread has become truly epic, 5 stars.
11-13-2010 , 09:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnston
You know his sn?
Yeah, but just recently found out.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SimaoMacaco
Hmmmyourchips would make sense. Good guess?
nope , gonna leave it to luvin if he wants to reveal hjimself. though he allready did ITT tbh but w/e (or is this a lvl?)

Quote:
Originally Posted by slowlane123
This is awesome.

Oh, and MMmmm your chips is not whoever you think it is ;-)

Thread has become truly epic, 5 stars.
confirmed MMmyourchips = Slowlane
11-13-2010 , 11:58 AM
I didnt mean luvin, thought you were talking about xplore.
11-13-2010 , 12:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnston
I didnt mean luvin, thought you were talking about xplore.
Know his sn aswell but I'm not 100% sure. If it is what I think it is I have some really lol notes on him.
11-13-2010 , 12:04 PM
MMmmmmyourtits
11-13-2010 , 12:44 PM
xplore outed himself ITT, if you dont know luvins thats just funny, and mmmmyourchips has revealed himself too

      
m