Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
*** Non-Official Rush Poker Regulars Thread*** (NSFW) *** Non-Official Rush Poker Regulars Thread*** (NSFW)

11-11-2010 , 01:30 AM
Well no I didn't have a freeroll because he was never going to pay up anyway. I originally posted it for lulz but I don't like that he's making out like I'm in the wrong or doctoring evidence when all he needed to say was that he never had any intention of shipping. You really think he would've shipped 500 if I had shown at the table?

I don't understand why you'd defend him when he's the one throwing insults around. We could debate semantics and analogies for either side but everyone knows what he meant by saying that.

fwiw, I still don't know if you can show cards at rush. I thought the hand just skips to the next before you can press anything. I'm probably wrong there but it's stupid really as I have other tables to worry about before I start reading chatboxes and racing to the options menu.

Big laughs at him having to "track me down".

Last edited by YippeeKaeYay; 11-11-2010 at 01:33 AM. Reason: I don't think anyone really thinks he should be banned.
11-11-2010 , 01:54 AM
fwiw if i was in that situation id have taken it to mean "show me right now." if you turn off automuck and show then you're owed 500. but like blanko said alot of the gratification of it is in the moment. posting in some thread just isnt the same as doing it at the table imo
11-11-2010 , 02:25 AM
not sure if it's possible to see/show at rush, but i know there's a very slight delay sometimes before being moved to the next table. sometimes i'll quickfold pre closing the action and see the flop briefly etc. so it should probably work
11-11-2010 , 02:27 AM
CTRL+M toggles whether you insta muck, and you can definitely show in rush.

usually the person wont see it though unless they look back over the HH.

i think dude should probably pay the $500 fwiw. if i ever said that in chat i would actually almost expect to be shown on the forum or PM rather than in-game.... as weird as that might sound.
11-11-2010 , 02:41 AM
a 9/8 nit + hero haz AA + low card flops + 3b pot = AUTO FLOPPING SET MACHINE

this game crushes my soul consistently


Full Tilt Poker $0.50/$1 No Limit Hold'em - 9 players
The Official 2+2 Hand Converter By DeucesCracked Poker Videos

UTG+2: $82.20
MP1: $109.85
MP2: $34.90
CO: $121.00
BTN: $22.90
Hero (SB): $100.50
BB: $205.15
UTG: $207.70
UTG+1: $191.90

Pre Flop: ($1.50) Hero is SB with A A
5 folds, CO raises to $3, 1 fold, Hero raises to $10, 1 fold, CO calls $7

Flop: ($21.00) 7 4 8 (2 players)
Hero bets $12, CO raises to $111 all in, Hero calls $78.50 all in

Turn: ($202.00) 7 (2 players - 2 are all in)

River: ($202.00) 2 (2 players - 2 are all in)

Final Pot: $202.00
CO shows 8 8 (a full house, Eights full of Sevens)
Hero shows A A (two pair, Aces and Sevens)
CO wins $199.00
(Rake: $3.00)
11-11-2010 , 03:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by xplore111
a 9/8 nit + hero haz AA + low card flops + 3b pot = AUTO FLOPPING SET MACHINE

this game crushes my soul consistently


Full Tilt Poker $0.50/$1 No Limit Hold'em - 9 players
The Official 2+2 Hand Converter By DeucesCracked Poker Videos

UTG+2: $82.20
MP1: $109.85
MP2: $34.90
CO: $121.00
BTN: $22.90
Hero (SB): $100.50
BB: $205.15
UTG: $207.70
UTG+1: $191.90

Pre Flop: ($1.50) Hero is SB with A A
5 folds, CO raises to $3, 1 fold, Hero raises to $10, 1 fold, CO calls $7

Flop: ($21.00) 7 4 8 (2 players)
Hero bets $12, CO raises to $111 all in, Hero calls $78.50 all in

Turn: ($202.00) 7 (2 players - 2 are all in)

River: ($202.00) 2 (2 players - 2 are all in)

Final Pot: $202.00
CO shows 8 8 (a full house, Eights full of Sevens)
Hero shows A A (two pair, Aces and Sevens)
CO wins $199.00
(Rake: $3.00)
Keep posting these, and I'm sure u'll find the way to avoid ppl hitting sets on you if you keep the hard work.... Def a part of my game I always try to improve aswell. gl at the tables.
11-11-2010 , 03:11 AM
Sup

Full Tilt Poker $200.00 No Limit Hold'em - 9 players
The Official 2+2 Hand Converter By DeucesCracked Poker Videos

UTG+2: $88.45
MP1: $200.90
MP2: $219.00
CO: $421.70
BTN: $266.80
SB: $256.05
Hero (BB): $399.00
UTG: $73.20
UTG+1: $60.45

Pre Flop: ($3.00) Hero is BB with 7 6
5 folds, CO raises to $6, 2 folds, Hero raises to $20, CO calls $14

Flop: ($41.00) K 5 Q (2 players)
Hero bets $26.00, CO calls $26

Turn: ($93.00) 6 (2 players)
Hero bets $72.00, CO calls $72

River: ($237.00) T (2 players)
Hero bets $281.00, CO folds

Final Pot: $237.00
Hero shows 7 6
Hero wins $234.00
(Rake: $3.00)
11-11-2010 , 03:31 AM
Decided to get tricky with Aces preflop, probably should of led flop..think turn is standard given his perceived range, going for value on the river is mandatory also I think as played.





Full Tilt Poker $1/$2 No Limit Hold'em - 9 players
The Official 2+2 Hand Converter By DeucesCracked Poker Videos

CO: $135.35
BTN: $200.00
SB: $149.25
Hero (BB): $205.00
UTG: $165.30
UTG+1: $207.00
jakobx1337: $282.00
MP1: $123.00
MP2: $445.20

Pre Flop: ($3.00) Hero is BB with A A
UTG raises to $6, UTG+1 raises to $18, jakobx1337 raises to $40, 5 folds, Hero calls $38, 1 fold, UTG+1 calls $22

Flop: ($127.00) 8 J 5 (3 players)
Hero checks, UTG+1 checks, jakobx1337 checks

Turn: ($127.00) K (3 players)
Hero checks, UTG+1 checks, jakobx1337 checks

River: ($127.00) 5 (3 players)
Hero requests TIME, Hero bets $62, UTG+1 folds, jakobx1337 requests TIME, jakobx1337 raises to $242 all in, Hero folds

Final Pot: $251.00
jakobx1337 wins $248.00
(Rake: $3.00)
11-11-2010 , 03:39 AM
It's hard to do anything preflop and not look like you have aces. I guess you can raise to $62 and rep a misclick.
11-11-2010 , 03:59 AM
Sup v2.0

Full Tilt Poker $400.00 No Limit Hold'em - 9 players
The Official 2+2 Hand Converter By DeucesCracked Poker Videos

CO: $281.40
BTN: $1552.60
Hero (SB): $400.00
BB: $520.75
UTG: $824.60
UTG+1: $790.90
UTG+2: $185.60
MP1: $466.40
MP2: $686.05

Pre Flop: ($6.00) Hero is SB with 9 T
7 folds, Hero raises to $12, BB raises to $32, Hero calls $20

Flop: ($64.00) 5 3 2 (2 players)
Hero checks, BB checks

Turn: ($64.00) 2 (2 players)
Hero bets $44.00, BB calls $44

River: ($152.00) K (2 players)
Hero checks, BB bets $112.00, Hero raises to $324, BB folds

Final Pot: $376.00
Hero wins $373.00
(Rake: $3.00)
11-11-2010 , 10:13 AM
meh, the fact that you didnt show there and then sort of gives standouts a loophole to wriggle out of, but the classy thing is obviously to pay up. id let it slide though because it is a total freeroll and such a ******ed "bet" that i almost feel bad for standouts.

i would remind him about it every chance i get though.
11-11-2010 , 10:14 AM
sabr posting every single bluff per session ITT. got to get that free advertising, eh?
11-11-2010 , 10:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedle
trash talking or not, your word is on the line here, ship him his money
loollll

yeah his problem was that he "bet" a somewhat believable amount of money vs a reg.

If it was 50$, he probably would have been hounded to no end until he paid up.


If it was "show me something other then QQ and i will ship you 1mil"
or "show me something other then QQ and i will ship you my left testicle"
the hand gets posted, nobody expects payment, chuckles are shared by all.
11-11-2010 , 11:52 AM
I dont get whats so funny about what I said
11-11-2010 , 12:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedle
I dont get whats so funny about what I said
taking a steamfold smacktalk seriously and trying to hold him to it

the situation as a whole is what I find funny though

reminds me of...




But now that I read standouts "say what you want toolbag" response a bit closer, i kinda think he should pay up.
11-11-2010 , 12:10 PM
at least somewhat save face by shipping 500 pennies on the grounds he didn't specify dollars or anything
11-11-2010 , 12:40 PM
Don't say stuff you don't mean. There are people out there who will take one of your kidneys.
11-11-2010 , 01:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by blankoblanco
idk i sort of agree with standouts here (though it'd be classy if he did send the 500). he has a point though. he obviously wanted to be shown right away for instant gratification, otherwise it's not worth the same. be happy he gave you a freeroll at all. he didn't say "prove you didn't have QQ, eventually" he said "show me something other than QQ"

example: suppose you were on a televised table and said "show me QQ and i'll give you x amount of money," but the guy mucks. then later it's shown on tv and the hole card cam proves he did have QQ. you think he should be paid? it's pretty clear and indisputable what "show me" means. it means show it at the table. doesn't matter if you can prove it later imo, bc then it's already lost part of its value

at the least i don't think he should be banned if he doesn't pay... just my opinion
This is exactly my point. I didn't tell you to show me after the fact at that point it means nothing to me. You had your chance and you can show in rush. This is why I used my timer and waited for you. I gave you the shot, but you didn't know how to turn off auto muck. I figured most regs did my bad.


Quote:
Originally Posted by YippeeKaeYay
Well no I didn't have a freeroll because he was never going to pay up anyway. I originally posted it for lulz but I don't like that he's making out like I'm in the wrong or doctoring evidence when all he needed to say was that he never had any intention of shipping. You really think he would've shipped 500 if I had shown at the table?

I don't understand why you'd defend him when he's the one throwing insults around. We could debate semantics and analogies for either side but everyone knows what he meant by saying that.

fwiw, I still don't know if you can show cards at rush. I thought the hand just skips to the next before you can press anything. I'm probably wrong there but it's stupid really as I have other tables to worry about before I start reading chatboxes and racing to the options menu.

Big laughs at him having to "track me down".
As for not paying up you can't even say that because you didn't complete you end of the bet that I asked. I never insulted you until you started to make it sound like I wasn't going to pay up. Also I never said you were doctoring up the results.... I simply said that I am not going to pay up for a HH after that fact. I wanted to be shown the cards and it didn't happen all there is to it man sorry. You guys can bash all you want have some fun in your lives yeesh its a game fellas.
11-11-2010 , 01:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Belok
taking a steamfold smacktalk seriously and trying to hold him to it

the situation as a whole is what I find funny though

But now that I read standouts "say what you want toolbag" response a bit closer, i kinda think he should pay up.
Think what you want, but I am clearly going to be mad when someone is trying to flame me for a simple message in a chat box in which he didn't do the action and then wants to be paid. I never attacked him until he started calling me out which in my opinion isn't cool at all. You can find better ways to scrap out 500 then that.
11-11-2010 , 01:18 PM
totally weak
11-11-2010 , 01:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jij452
Keep posting these, and I'm sure u'll find the way to avoid ppl hitting sets on you if you keep the hard work.... Def a part of my game I always try to improve aswell. gl at the tables.
Wut
11-11-2010 , 01:47 PM
What an angle shot by Standouts...
11-11-2010 , 01:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by springsteen87
What an angle shot by Standouts...
it's pretty standard for standouts to find the worst loop hole ( technicality ) to get out of holding his end of the deal. it's like HU4ROLLZ basically
11-11-2010 , 02:17 PM
Pretty standard for me to find the worst loophole? Like I am some regular on here that tries to wiggle out of things on a normal basis HAHA. You guys are classic I am getting some real laughs out of this whole thing.
11-11-2010 , 02:21 PM
He wanted the show live, not posted on a forum afterwards. If you show it live i think you could gripe, but as played his argument is perfectly valid.

Now can we move onto the important topic of why only ever flop a set in a 3bet pot when I hold AA.

Last edited by SimaoMacaco; 11-11-2010 at 02:25 PM. Reason: Deleted then abusive comment at the start

      
m