huh. that explains why your redline is so high in the results threads.

I play the same, but the opponents in 6max tend to be splashier pre and post, so I have to adjust accordingly. So I suppose I should have said "the same as a loose FR table after EPs fold."

youre a good man...good good man

I just got owned incredibly hard in 50nl Rush, I though he'd fold a pocket pair. anybody like my riverovershove?

Stats: VPIP: 17, PFR: 17, 3B: 25, AF: 1.0, Hands: 12

Full Tilt Poker $0.25/$0.50 No Limit Hold'em - 9 players
The Official 2+2 Hand Converter By DeucesCracked Poker Videos

MP1: $55.35
MP2: $52.75
CO: $54.80
BTN: $93.05
SB: $158.25
BB: $55.30
Hero (UTG): $50.00
UTG+1: $65.00
UTG+2: $13.75

Pre Flop: ($0.75) Hero is UTG with A K
Hero raises to $1.75, 6 folds, SB raises to $3.50, 1 fold, Hero calls $1.75

Flop: ($7.50) 6 5 4 (2 players)
SB checks, Hero checks

Turn: ($7.50) 6 (2 players)
SB bets $5.50, Hero calls $5.50

River: ($18.50) 8 (2 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $41 all in, SB calls $41

i would not try to bluff an unknown who 3bet to 7bb oop against an ep open. he obviously is able to count to potato (not that your line makes sense for anything except maybe 77 or 88)

meh I don't think it's horrible, he will definitely fold a lot.

well he has to for it to be a decent bluff... and realistically villain should be folding next to nothing

Thanks guys. I used to play limit 6 max, but havent played anything buy NL Full ring since about 2006. Considering a move to 6 max.

How does standard FR play compared to Rush? In one thread someone said its 5 times easier, which I am sure was an exaggeration but how different is it?

its easier but might not be as profitable if that makes sense

im at 2.1 ptbb over the last 120k hands at rush wich is about the same as reg tables. It would be interesting to see some more info on winrates vs reg tables

My wr for rush over like 90k of about half 1/2, and half .50/1 hands is 3 ptbb, where my regular table wr over a little over 200k hands is 4ptbb of mostly .50/1

yeah my rush wr is a bit over 3pt and reg table one is higher. My sample at regular tables is pretty small though

I'm break even through 195k hands at .5/1 but am just starting to come out of a 30 buy in down swing. I tried to adjust my blind play to fix what was my biggest leak, needless to say it didn't work.

Was really why I was asking cos if I can potentially make 1-2ptbb at normal FR then it maybe the better option for me.

graphs for laughs

should clarify 200nl

too confusing

LOL was prett stoned when I wrote that :P

I meant that I have a about a 90k sample (a mix of 1/2 and .50/1 FR) with a winrate of about 3 ptbb at Rush.

I have a 200k sample of .50/1 FR with a wr of 4ptbb at regular tables.

confirmed still stoned

My winrate at 1/2 rush is slightly higher, but very close to regular tables over about 100k hands each.

My guess would be regular tables have the higher potential winrate, especially the better you are as a player. There seem to be slightly more legitimate fish at regular tables imo but I have no numbers to back this up. Also with seat selection and what I think is an easier chance for a dynamic to develop between players if you can adjust well, regular tables have to be more profitable.

Rush is so much easier from a management standpoint though. No seat selection, tables nice and easy on the eyes, little head and mouse movement, easy bathroom breaks and I can play more hands per hour.

Hmmm FWIW (probably not much)....

Database totals

.................Players.......Hands......Total Amount Down.......VPIP/PFR

Rush $1/2.....9,261........726,896...........-70,272...............16.7/10.1

Reg. $1/2.....7,396.........654,966...........-75,888...............20/10.7

flips don't count bro

You have summed up my thoughts on Rush very nicely. +1 to pretty much everything you've said.

[x]confirmed.
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

lolz

XFD