*** Non-Official Rush Poker Regulars Thread*** (NSFW) - Page 8 - Small Stakes Full Ring Games - Small Stakes Poker Strategy Forum

Login

Register

Two Plus Two Forums Archived Forums Strategy Small Stakes Full Ring

*** Non-Official Rush Poker Regulars Thread*** (NSFW)

Subscribe

...

Page 8 of 108

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 18 28 58

Page 8 of 108

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 18 28 58

10-05-2010 , 09:57 PM

#176

oakrdrzfan

adept

Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 1,146

Quote:

Originally Posted by 99killed

i've been getting 1500h/hr playing 8 (fr+6m) semi loose which slows ya down obv- almost exactly stars 24tabling numbers minus all the table setup bs

joeys right, no vpps tho =( but we do get the lolBLACK-CARD!

What set up you use for this? Tile, Stack, Cascade?

10-05-2010 , 11:26 PM

#177

99killed

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 6,188

Quote:

Originally Posted by WildBobAA

I would cream my pants if Stars comes out with Rush.

this would be so awesome cos the pools would be so big. after awhile when u get some hands on ppl im sure it would be the same but randoms stay random longer. they have to be working on it imo, one time stars.

10-05-2010 , 11:27 PM

#178

99killed

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 6,188

Quote:

Originally Posted by oakrdrzfan

What set up you use for this? Tile, Stack, Cascade?

i just use some script i wrote kinda like chirens and table-of-interest.

Last edited by 99killed; 10-05-2010 at 11:31 PM. Reason: +TN ldo

10-06-2010 , 02:31 AM

#179

goshmr5

adept

Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 1,081

anyone concerned about their RB and stuff with black card check out my posts in the FTP Regulars thread. I'll be keeping it updated.

10-06-2010 , 03:03 AM

#180

Splatercash

centurion

Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 110

Can you imagine the pressure on Full Tilt's Rush Patent. If that thing gives and Stars bring out Rush poker there will be a massive decline on FT I expect. You'd have to be brain dead to grind FT Rush for reduced rakeback + blackcard when you could get SN easily on Stars and even SNE would be more achieveable.

10-06-2010 , 10:53 AM

#181

bookish

adept

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 752

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splatercash

Can you imagine the pressure on Full Tilt's Rush Patent. If that thing gives and Stars bring out Rush poker there will be a massive decline on FT I expect. You'd have to be brain dead to grind FT Rush for reduced rakeback + blackcard when you could get SN easily on Stars and even SNE would be more achieveable.

Thats the beauty of Rush. Its similar enough to a regular game to attract players, but different enough to be both appealing and patentable.

The cliff-notes for the patent will be something like "when each hand ends you are assigned a different set of players at your table".

How do you work around that?

10-06-2010 , 10:59 AM

#182

rockrollins

veteran

Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 2,686

Quote:

Originally Posted by bookish

Thats the beauty of Rush. Its similar enough to a regular game to attract players, but different enough to be both appealing and patentable.

The cliff-notes for the patent will be something like "when each hand ends you are assigned a different set of players at your table".

How do you work around that?

That's why people have lawyers.

10-06-2010 , 12:45 PM

#183

Ijizz

old hand

Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 1,651

Full Tilt Poker $100.00 No Limit Hold'em - 9 players
The Official 2+2 Hand Converter By DeucesCracked Poker Videos

BTN: $100.00
SB: $100.15
BB: $143.35
UTG: $110.50
UTG+1: $39.00
UTG+2: $72.00
MP1: $107.15
Hero (MP2): $100.00
CO: $79.00

Pre Flop: ($1.50) Hero is MP2 with T

A

4 folds, Hero raises to $3, 1 fold, BTN calls $3, 2 folds

Flop: ($7.50) 5

Q

9

(2 players)
Hero bets $5.00, BTN calls $5

Turn: ($17.50) A

(2 players)
Hero checks, BTN bets $12.00, Hero calls $12

River: ($41.50) 9

(2 players)
Hero checks, BTN bets $26.00, Hero folds

just bet turn right?

10-06-2010 , 12:47 PM

#184

skelm

veteran

Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 3,448

Oh hai der

10-06-2010 , 12:57 PM

#185

Ijizz

old hand

Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 1,651

^ skelm?

10-06-2010 , 01:35 PM

#186

skelm

veteran

Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 3,448

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ijizz

^ skelm?

skelm.

10-06-2010 , 01:52 PM

#187

rockrollins

veteran

Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 2,686

Confirmed. Skelm.

10-06-2010 , 01:54 PM

#188

azteca lady

centurion

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 193

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kos13

Not sure I'd be bragging about 1.5 PTBB, but winning is winning. You're still a weirdo, though.

who said that was a brag? just a garph sir

10-06-2010 , 01:55 PM

#189

azteca lady

centurion

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 193

Quote:

Originally Posted by wGH2

can i barg then?

200rushie

ur my hero, be there w/ u soon

10-06-2010 , 02:12 PM

#190

skelm

veteran

Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 3,448

Quote:

Originally Posted by azteca lady

who said that was a brag? just a garph sir

Nah, thinly veiled brag bro.

10-06-2010 , 02:22 PM

#191

skelm

veteran

Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 3,448

I have decided I'll balance my posts in the Official FullTilt regulars thread out by not taking this one seriously. In honor of that: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0

10-06-2010 , 02:37 PM

#192

walkingonwater5

banned

Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 396

So i guess i am in the minority here, through 6 days looks like my rake has gone up.. HEM has my rake paid at 934.34.. My rake site has me at 1047.44.. Sounds like a raise to me

10-06-2010 , 02:47 PM

#193

skelm

veteran

Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 3,448

Quote:

Originally Posted by walkingonwater5

So i guess i am in the minority here, through 6 days looks like my rake has gone up.. HEM has my rake paid at 934.34.. My rake site has me at 1047.44.. Sounds like a raise to me

From the FTP regs thread:

Quote:

Originally Posted by skelm

Wow, I'm primarily a rush player and $308 increase (14,704 hands) - Win.. Or error?

edit: To MGR not rakeback obv

10-06-2010 , 02:54 PM

#194

Splatercash

centurion

Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 110

Rush poker, NL200. Folds to CO who opens to $7, BTN calls, you have AKs in BB and 3-bet to $24 (fairly standard). Original raiser, makes it like $55 and other guy folds. What is your play. Guy is like 15/12 or thereabouts with 75% fold to 3bet and 25% 4-bet. This means he has no 3-bet call range. Either folds or 4bets..

100bb effective, what is our play?

10-06-2010 , 02:59 PM

#195

skelm

veteran

Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 3,448

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splatercash

Rush poker, NL200. Folds to CO who opens to $7, BTN calls, you have AKs in BB and 3-bet to $24 (fairly standard). Original raiser, makes it like $55 and other guy folds. What is your play. Guy is like 15/12 or thereabouts with 75% fold to 3bet and 25% 4-bet. This means he has no 3-bet call range. Either folds or 4bets..

100bb effective, what is our play?

Standard ship, he will have weaker hands in his range (despite people assuming this isn't the case at rush it most certainly is) and there's a decent amount of dead money. If you think he only has QQ+ AK then call the 4bet and donk ship any flop.

10-06-2010 , 03:02 PM

#196

badgers_uk

journeyman

Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 321

I think you should fold because you have no FE and you are either flipping or dominated.

10-06-2010 , 03:03 PM

#197

Splatercash

centurion

Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 110

Thanks. Next question, why do similar villains in similar circumstances only ever show me KK+ since about march (I say march because first few months of Rush were way more volatile).

I am really battling raw maths versus a lot of experience to suggest the maths (and my assumptions) must be wrong.

So many of our "standard ships" at Rush produce unfavourable results over large samples. Why?

10-06-2010 , 03:04 PM

#198

Splatercash

centurion

Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 110

Quote:

Originally Posted by badgers_uk

I think you should fold because you have no FE and you are either flipping or dominated.

We must have some FE? I mean a guy with 75/25 fold/4-bet response to a 3-bet has to have a wider range than AK+JJ+, especially in LP battle with a dead 4bb?

10-06-2010 , 03:10 PM

#199

BigBiceps

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 6,205

Hello.
Does Rui Nunes post here?

If you read this please PM me, I have a question.

10-06-2010 , 03:14 PM

#200

skelm

veteran

Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 3,448

Quote:

Originally Posted by badgers_uk

I think you should fold because you have no FE and you are either flipping or dominated.

For your sake I really hope this is a level.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splatercash

Thanks. Next question, why do similar villains in similar circumstances only ever show me KK+ since about march (I say march because first few months of Rush were way more volatile).
I am really battling raw maths versus a lot of experience to suggest the maths (and my assumptions) must be wrong.

So many of our "standard ships" at Rush produce unfavourable results over large samples. Why?

Variance sir.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splatercash

We must have some FE? I mean a guy with 75/25 fold/4-bet response to a 3-bet has to have a wider range than AK+JJ+, especially in LP battle with a dead 4bb?

Obv we do. His was a level or fish post.

Page 8 of 108

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 18 28 58

Subscribe

...

Page 8 of 108

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 18 28 58

m