Quote:
Originally Posted by A-Rod's Cousin
Players are pretty dumb and really biased when it comes to judging their colleagues. A preconceived point system (thought not the dumb FedEx 5x point system) is way more accurate than what Billy Bob Billiams thinks after 18 seconds of thought.
I don't think we can have it both ways. The players can't be voting for what the point system says for 20 straight years or whatever AND also be really biased and way less accurate than the same point system
The players would not vote for Phil or Adam now, the talk should be in the context of what would happen if Phil ends up with 3 wins, the Open, and the FedEx cup and Tiger ends up with 5 wins, the players, the money title, the scoring title.
I think Phil might have the stronger case if he pulls that off, especially considering if he wins the FEC he will have won more money even if not more official money.
Maybe your monolouge could be Boo Williams after spending 4 hours next to John Daly at Hooters but I think the rest of them are actually pretty thoughtful about these things