Quote:
Originally Posted by cwicemvp12
I personally don't see the need for it, but I'm a disciple of the NHL thread where we cycle between low-content in-game posting and serious discussion when nothing is happening pretty flawlessly. I'm assuming most of this thread's posts are going to be low-content because of the nature of golf discussion, but I'm not sure that 1) a discussion thread by itself would survive, and 2) 'serious' posts are necessarily getting lost. For the vast majority of tournaments, I don't think there's enough in-round posting to have someone's serious post overlooked to the point where it would get considerably more attention in another thread. I'm not even sure it's justified in cases like today, but even if it was, it's also silly to think a well thought out attempt at discussion will get the attention it deserves in the middle of an exciting round vs. when the players have finished for the day.
If it's what the people want I'm not going to fight to the death to stop you guys; I'm just skeptical at this point.
I'm torn. It's less than five posters that routinely blather low content tripe in the PGA season threads, the same people that tend to mega post over in SE 100+ times during a single football game. Why people think this is cool I have no idea.
So if it wasn't for a few people, it wouldn't be necessary. But then again, if all the crap is contained in one thread, those who take things a bit more seriously don't have to wade through it to read the important stuff.
The only problem is if people post good stuff in the low content thread, it won't be read by all. Also new posters could be confused by the dual threads.
I'd just hate to see this good forum turn into a mirror of SE where 95% of the posts are total crap. So I guess do whatever needs to be done not to let that happen.
BO