Quote:
Originally Posted by BadBoyBenny
If you really want me to guess the answer is about the same
Thanks. Now for the third time... (hopefully this time you expound)... why do you believe this?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ntnBO
This is precisely why those who think Tiger is the GOAT have a lot to learn, the above statement is incredibly ludicrous. You are trying to crown him long before his career is over and you cannot do that. GOAT is measured over a career, so let Tiger finish his career and then figure it out.
By saying Jack has played more majors and it's not fair, Keegan Bradley would have been the GOAT after his PGA win. He was 1 for 1 in majors, GOAT for sure.
BO
This is lazy thinking. "Let's wait until stuff ends before we can qualify it" is pure laziness or just an inability to think at a reasonable level.
Unfortunately the world isn't this clean and neat. We have to make assumptions and projections to determine things. For this exercise, you can imagine Tiger dies tonight in a fiery plane crash. Now his career is over! Voila...your thoughts?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ntnBO
Run! Get away from that sinkhole!
Of course the Keegan example is silly, equally as silly as stating 18<14 for a career because 14 has played fewer events.
BO
If you don't see a difference between a sample size of 1 and 14 then you are less intelligent than any of us thought.