not sure what your point is but I'm pretty sure it's rebutted by "lol sample size yo"

If you are going to bring in the field averages for the week, you should definitely include how those 2 actually played the hole.

Either way it is getting off topic of Spieth not closing it out.

Lol no its not getting off the topic at all silly, that's the point.

If he played the hole better than the field AND better than his fellow competitors, wtf do you call that?

"closing it out" is now a humpy dumpy word meaning whatever you want it to mean. Plus what pray tell did he do to get into the playoff in the first place, would you say he "closed out" his fourth round usefully or not?

You seriously dont play golf do you?

With the garbage logic you guys are using, if Spieth would have made 5 on that hole while ZJ and Hearn made 6, you guys would really be arguing he closed it out?

LOL that's not what the logic of his post says at all

The entire argument is if Spieth closed them out.

His overall argument is Spieth closed them out because he was better than them in the playoff. No?

Wetzel and BBB:

Ignore List is your friend. Your efforts are futile. It's not worth it.

No, it's that you're an idiot who doesn't understand that in fact par is a good score on that hole, whether the tournament score was +3 or -19.

I guess one has to have played golf tournaments in the past to understand. Also regardless of that hole, you also ignore the fact of how the first 4 holes were played by everyone.

I welcome anyone to look up the stats if possible of how often par wins outright in a 3+ man playoff. It just does not happen pretty much ever. Do you guys not get this?

Hilarious you guys love numbers so much but ignore the fact the Hearn missed a putt that he makes between 90-95% of the time. But yet Spieth wasnt lucky at all and closed it out on his own. OK cool story guys

To show you what a moron you are, by your logic Faldo didn't know how to close out majors even after he won three of them.

British open: won with 18 pars, what a buffoon, shoulda shot 62 obv
Masters: only won because Hoch missed a 2 footer FOR PAR lolol he won with a bogey in a playoff !!!!!11!!1!!!
Masters: won after Floyd yanked one into the drink, how hard is that lolol

Yeah you dont play golf, I am convinced. Also your examples do not address what I said at all. You guys also miss the point. Shocker. So much fail in one post.

Like would you seriously try to argue Hoch missing that 2 footer for par wasnt a gift? Hilarious example.

Everyone that wins a golf tournament probably got lucky at some point in the tournament but the likelihood of what happened for Spieth on 18 of regulation and then the 5 holes of the playoff is easily less than 1% which is why he got incredibly lucky.

This will probably get ignored also. You idiots read what you want to read.

How many PGA tour playoffs have you been in, BYN? Must be more than zero right?

I mean, I'll settle for any personal anecdotes of playoffs with a top prize of a million bucks, can be anywhere.

What? You don't have any?

Then shut the **** up about "you don't play golf" you steaming nutsack.

Lol at all the anger itt

Lol you look like an idiot with how you are acting. You realize there Web.com tour doesn't have million dollar prizes right? Every one of those players clearly know more than you. All you have shown is that you can't think rationally so arguing with you is pointless. Bye

So much this. Never once called anyone a name. But when your argument clearly sucks, always revert to name calling. This is how it has always been with ARC so not surprised this Wetzel Pretzel guy is any different. They however have never played golf before. This much I am confident of

^^ Yeah and I am the idiot, how old are you 12?..... ROFL gtfo

My dad on the phone just now on Spieth (first time we've talked since the weekend and he always has golf commentary early in the week):

"Is my boy Spieth gonna win soon? I'm tired of listening to Johnny Miller and his bull****. Shut the hell up, he's three times the golfer you ever were, Johnny. Every time he hits a bad shot 'oh the pressure's getting to him.' Its never because, you know, he just hit a bad shot. 'Oh he got a little quick and overcooked that one, must be the nerves.' Maybe he just hit a ****ing bad shot. I can't wait for him to win 3 or 4 more tournaments this year and a major to shut this idiot up and let us hear guys like Maltbie who sometimes says something insightful."

For the record I'm probably more like a 14, but I don't keep an official handicap. Yet they actually let me feed and clothe myself and drive a car if you can believe it. The wonders!

And yet, despite my ineptitude at such a rudimentary task as propelling a dimpled sphere through the air, I'm able to deduce basic facts about the game like the fact that scoring a 4 on a hole where the average score of golfers in the event is significantly greater than 4 is a good thing most of the time.

But obviously BYN has been able to buy a few supercomputers with his Web.com "winnings" to refute the fact that 4 < 4.12.

By the way, I shot a 57 last week and you didn't so nyah.

Saying you are acting like one and calling you one are very different. Your reading comprehension is obviously lacking so it is no surprise you are missing my entire point. 4.12>4 is literally all you have. Just like the Jack argument when they say 19>14.

Hearns and ZJs average on that hole was under par for the week. Dont give a *** what the fields was when they arent the ones in the playoff

Ok you are a complete ******. In what world is 4.12 SIGNIFICANTLY greater than 4?

Im not sure you even know what you are arguing here Wetzel