I think you bigger than me.

The only girls I've ever met that talked or cared that much about dick size were total sluts or pro whores.
Instead about whining about your dick size and trolling us with "every girl wants a 12 inch dick (which is total bs), why don't you sleep with better quality girls.
I would be meaner about this, but clearly you are mentally and psychologically damaged and require professional treatment and counseling.

What's your definition of better quality? Slut and whore are definitley the more attractives ones.

All women care about cock size. All women prefer a bigger dick to a smaller one. That's not only all Thai women, it's all women the world over.

These so called higher quality women you refer to still care about cock size, still would prefer a bigger one they are just being polite and not saying anything about it to you.

Better quality would generally be somebody the whole poker room or bar hasn't banged already.
Girls don't obsess over size as much as you might imagine.
A Virgin may be tighter (usually) but I doubt that's one of your better lays. As long as you're adequate should be fine. 5 inch plus definitely more than enough in Asia.

They don't obsess about it to you. They do obsess about it with their friends and in their own head.

It's simple. A bigger dick gives a woman a better sensation and more pleasure during sex. Of course it's an important factor to all of them. Saying it's not is actually just illogical.

The whole 'it's not the size of the hammer that matters it's how you hit the nail,' or 'it's not the size of the boat that matters it's the motion of the ocean,' argument is purely and simply bull sh it.

I wonder if you really are arguing with ecoeco or is those comment are for swimmin.,

I don't need to convince Swimmin, Swimmin is the only other guy in this thread that seems to know what I'm saying is true. Rest are in denial I guess.

Actually Swimmin is the one in denial. He is convinced his lack of sexual prowess is completely due to a circumstance out of his control therefore he does nothing to not suck in bed.

Everyone else who is saying "yeah bigger is usually better but that doesn't doom you to being completely inadequate at sex" are the ones who aren't in denial.

eating a working girl is beta

Sounds like a cross between Patrick Bateman and Hannibal Lecter, both of which are pretty alpha imo.

I didn't say there wasn't other things you could do for her to still have an ok time.

But that wasn't what I was saying people are in denial about.

It's the statement 'cock size really isn't that big a deal to most women,' that is just completely incorrect, and anyone dying on a hill defending it is in denial, I'd say.

How about we agree it's the law of diminishing returns.
Obviously in general bigger is better, but don't tell me that most girls obsess for 7 when they have 6 in hand.
Thats like saying C cup girls should not have sex because obviously those damn D and DD cup girls have a huge advantage on them in enjoyment.
If you have like 3 inches or less obviously we feel sorry for you, but 5 plus in Asia is not a major disadvantage. Usually it's other factors (like badgering the girl whether your dick is honestly and truly not small) that would be the bigger turnoff. Plus seems swimmin is poor, which is the biggest negative in Asia.

It is true that Swimmin seems to over hype his problem. If he actually had a micro penis then that's one thing, but he says he has 5.75. If he does have 5.75 then I agree he shouldn't be having all the problems with girls that he is claiming. There is no way 5.75 is smallest they have ever seen.

Yeah, most of the times when a girl, especially Asian, throws a member size insult, a counter-insult about her breast size is avalaible. Of course this leads to a quarrel, but at least the ego remains undamaged

What women think of your penis shouldn't bother you anyway since you don't have sex in the first place.

Right, it doesn't.

But before I realised I don't need sex (at a relatively late age, actually), I had had a lot of reflection on how I would approach it if it were 'mandatory'.

Not needing or capable of having sex must be both liberating and pathetic at the same time.

The realisation of one's true nature is only liberating, has no downsides whatsoever

Somewhat fascinated by this tbh. I might have missed the initial post, I'm not sure if you're asexual or content with masturbation.

So C00n, how immune would you say you are to things associated with sex? By that I mean, when a pretty girl asks you for a favor, do you treat her ~the same as a less attractive girl? As a man? How do you respond to advertising/marketing that "sells" sex? Does it even register for you?

Coon74, you said you would only consider taking part in sex if it had a purpose e.g. if you were to prostitute yourself. Would you charge an attractive girl less than a less attractive one?

As said earlier, I'd rather be alone than have to please anyone else, so I'm more than just 'content'.

I'm less friendly with women than with men because I suspect ulterior motives in the former, and even if they don't have such, their prettiness is a distraction that leads to nothing constructive. I mean, women are just as capable as men at doing their jobs, but I'd rather women act in a genderless way if they mean business.

It slightly registers physically because I do appreciate upper-body prettiness, but the more naked a woman is, the less excited I am because raw bodies are boring and clothes aren't.

I understand that it's unusual to sexual people to even distinguish between various kinds of attraction.

That a woman has better makeup (is more attractive aesthetically) doesn't mean I would want to be more prone to friendship or whatever intimacy with her, or charge less.

To clarify on pricing, the main reason why I see no sense in giving discounts to attractive women is that I can get my dose of pics on the Internet for free anyway if I so wish, when I'm alone and there's no awkwardness.

If I ever have to please a woman down there (which will be necessarily licking or fingering as those ways are most efficient at delivering female orgasms), it won't really matter what the rest of her body will look like because I'll be focused on my job and her interactive feedback.

I have no problems with toggling my boner on if she really needs it because it can be powered by my imagination rather than anyone's actual appearance.

In general, asexuals are known to be better lovers when they do 'have' to make love, because they're 100% focused on the partner's sensations.

Is this applicable to only sex or for other life stuff?

I realise that some amount of interaction of humans in needed in order not to die of hunger, but I do tend to make it as unaffectionate as possible.

I mean, I sometimes do things that are useful to other people, and sometimes I do them without mercenary motives because I'm way too kind, but I'd rather make explicit contracts for more committal relationships than rely on anyone's unspoken loyalty.