Quote:
Originally Posted by Squibz
Just as we seem to have different definitions of what is or isn't a scam, it appears we also seem to have different definitions of what "idiot" means. I will say, though, that when one side in an argument resorts to ad-hominem attacks instead of reasoned arguments, it's usually the side that's wrong.
you are an idiot because you don't grasp the concept or have basic understanding for supply/demand in a free market economy. Anyone has a right to offer whatever service they so choose at whatever price. As long as there is no deception in the enterprise, it does not constitute a scam. You also provide no bright line as to what is an appropriate amount of vig to charge for these transfers, nor do you give any logic for why you are any type of authority on the matter. Why is charging 5% for a transfer a scam and banks charging 3% not a scam? Should all banks be bound to charge nothing for the services they offered?
its funny in this case i will continue to insult you because you are a ****** (a somewhat articulate ******, ill give you that), and I am 100% correct in everything i say despite using ad-hominem attacks in the process. I mean read your posts, do you not get how stupid your logic is? "well 5% is a scam because you can do x -> y -> z for <5%" is your basic argument, and despite your many posts in response, you still rely on the same elementary argument that gets you no where.
now please stfu and go away.