Quote:
Originally Posted by shipontilt
i call, more times then not you are prob winning against that type of villian
that was my next question should the fact that the villian is as bad as can be possible (i.e. -100% return on his 76 investments) have swayed my decision whether to call or not or is it simply a question of my hand being a draw because I think there's 2 facets that made me make my decision and I wonder how valid they are
1) Doubling here and becoming 2nd in chips in the tournament greatly improves my chances of winning the torny as opposed to waiting for another spot because here i know I have adleast 12 outs twice with 3 addition tie outs against the nuts and depending on his hand ranges up to 18 outs twice which as far as gambling on draws goes is about as good as it gets in holdem
2) If I fold here how confident am I that I will play a pot for 3.5x the average shot and have a legitmate shot to minimize my reliance on luck (i.e. be able to withstand bad beats and lost coinflips and still go on to win) and i didn't think I would have many more opportunities on average to attain a "big" stack" which would enable me to withstand variance so that coupled with the element above made me believe gambling in this spot will perhaps give me the "BEST" opportunity to go on to win even though all I have is a draw and great holdem players pride themselves on being a prohibitive favorite and not drawing or calling off chips on draws
does that makes sense because I think that's logicalistically sound no?