This is a fold but if you are 3 betting a hand like 44 here im assuming its to 5-bet jam right ? otherwise its ridiculous to 3 bet this hand in the 1st place ....just wondering if this was your plan because you never mentioned this in original post .... a la joe cheong
Looking at this in the complilation, and have a couple of comments.
First, OP is getting 1.26-1. This is not that huge an overshove. Also, villain was UTG 6-max, which is real different from an UTG raise at a full table.
I think villain has AK/AQ a very large percentage of the time. AK seems like the natural hand to make this play with. However, you still can't call with 44. You need 44% equity to be cEV+, and I don't see how you get that. There are also big ICM considerations, but they may be somewhat compensated for by the value in becoming tournament leader if you win.
As for the initial 3-bet, I think small pps are awful to do this with. First of all, you are deep enough to call and play for a set, as well as using position, so you lose some value here.
Also, you get flatted a lot, and this is tricky to play the 84% or so of the time you don't flop a set or straight draw. With a suited gapper, you can semibluff with a draw.
Fold wahh!!!! Flat preflop imo, position, bigger stack, playable hand, image, you got more info on him than he does on you - a lot of things going in your favour.
I think you should realise/consider though for future spots, even if you are ahead or +ev chips vs his jamming range (marginal/optmistic!) you may well be giving away money to everyone else in the tournament by risking such a big % of your stack so light in this situation.
Edit: OK I just realised this thread is 6 years old. "missed this gold" lol Deo ! Elky was chippy eh?