Quote:
Originally Posted by Syndr0m
I'm glad you said that, because the point of that set was to hit an RPE8!
I'll have to attempt a 5RM squat later this week. Not sure what my plan is number wise. According to calculators using 140x7 my 1RM should be ~168 and I may be good for 150x5. But I may pussy out and make it 145.
Agree it's remarkable how fast strength comes back (relative to gaining it in the first place). I did eventually squat 190kg (420lbs) a few months before I quit training.
I assume it's also thanks to lol_oly. This program Zack Telander put me on has me squatting three times a week, accumulating a ton of volume at 75% and once heavy.
I watched some of his vids. Interesting guy. A lot is rehashed wisdom from old pendlay forums but he presents things articulately enough and no knowledge in weightlifting has really been "new" for decades now. Loved the clarence+stefi cohen colabs. She's looking better and better these days, did she lower da dose? Hope he doesn't start giving out sn pp and snatch balances or I'll immediately lose trust.
I am also experimenting with the "ton of volume at 70-80% in sets of 4-6" approach with DL currently. I think AMRAPs are the "best", but they're just too hard to recover from and too potentially injuries. If you go from lifting 80% for six triples to 80% for 6x6 in 4-5 weeks within the same ~15 minute session, you're going to get stronger, build muscle, and not put much stress on your joints. You'll probably become more technically efficient.
I'm guessing he applies a similar approach to the classical lifts as well and I think that's a smart way of doing things without burning out/injuring yourself. Lighter loads, no set is a ballbuster RPE, and you just kind off progressively add volume for one phase, then start tapering down volume as weight increases in the next phase.