Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
*** SWOLETEMBRO BITCHES LC THREAD *** *** SWOLETEMBRO BITCHES LC THREAD ***

09-12-2013 , 10:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by txdome
Wearing a belt isn't helping you get stronger, save that **** for max attempts.
You're partially right. Wearing a belt doesn't protect you, but you can lift heavier weight and get stronger if you use one properly. When you have a strong core and good form on a lift, and you want to move more weight on that lift, then a belt is fine imo.

McGill says to save belts for your championships because relying on them to protect you isn't good, but I think using one regularly is fine if you have a strong core and good lifting form because you improve your skill/ability to get the most out of a belt when you use one frequently.
09-12-2013 , 10:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcb33f
yeota chick has a sick body
if you like fatties
09-12-2013 , 10:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcb33f
pretty sure you're beta4life when you put on the ball and chain
lol quite possibly, but it's worked out pretty well for me so far. I could have never pulled off the level of tinder/okc quality that BTM et al have done even before I was married, so there wasn't really that far for me to fall. Mad respect to those guys for sure.
09-12-2013 , 10:54 AM
How do you define a strong core?

I wear a belt for squats and deads that are > 80-85%. Sometimes I used them for overhead stuff and oly lifts as well. They let me move more weight, but I'm not foolish enough to believe it affords me any added protection. It's just something my abs can push up against when I am valsalvaing and reminds me to stay tight.

Beginners who don't know how to maintain a neutral spine and don't know how to use the valsalva maneuver have no business using a belt until they learn proper movement/positioning without one imo.
09-12-2013 , 10:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PayoffWiz
How do you define a strong core?

I wear a belt for squats and deads that are > 80-85%. Sometimes I used them for overhead stuff and oly lifts as well. They let me move more weight, but I'm not foolish enough to believe it affords me any added protection. It's just something my abs can push up against when I am valsalvaing and reminds me to stay tight.

Beginners who don't know how to maintain a neutral spine and don't know how to use the valsalva maneuver have no business using a belt until they learn proper movement/positioning without one imo.
The underlined is how I use them, never really thought about using them for upper body lifts before perusing the logs of weasel, cha et al.

The rest of the post is obviously spot on, though. Now I've got to see if it helps me bench more.
09-12-2013 , 11:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PayoffWiz
How do you define a strong core?
I'd know it if I saw it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PayoffWiz
I wear a belt for squats and deads that are > 80-85%. Sometimes I used them for overhead stuff and oly lifts as well. They let me move more weight, but I'm not foolish enough to believe it affords me any added protection. It's just something my abs can push up against when I am valsalvaing and reminds me to stay tight.
This sounds pretty reasonable.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PayoffWiz
Beginners who don't know how to maintain a neutral spine and don't know how to use the valsalva maneuver have no business using a belt until they learn proper movement/positioning without one imo.
I agree.
09-12-2013 , 11:09 AM
Just finished the bench 185x10x4 two-minute rest challenge. Wasn't even close to failing this time. Probably nbd to you guys with Wilkes scores over 350, but I gave myself a fist bump.
09-12-2013 , 11:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BustoRhymes
Just finished the bench 185x10x4 two-minute rest challenge. Wasn't even close to failing this time. Probably nbd to you guys with Wilkes scores over 350, but I gave myself a fist bump.


Pretty impressive!

I hope you realize, though, that this is another link in the "fakebusto may value volume over intensity too much" chain.
09-12-2013 , 11:12 AM
Does anyone know of a way (either in Windows, or maybe a lightweight program) to store multiple things on a clipboard? Say for example I'd like to store the names bob, mary, and alex in clipboard slots 1, 2, and 3 or something. Then when typing up the document I wanna just do something like "At the mall today *ctrl+v+1* saw *ctrl+v+3* humping *ctrl+v+2* under a bench."
09-12-2013 , 11:16 AM
Monte,

I know... Next time 230x3x10?
09-12-2013 , 11:16 AM
What is the valsalva maneuver?

Last edited by Syndr0m; 09-12-2013 at 11:18 AM. Reason: nevermind, googled it
09-12-2013 , 11:19 AM
09-12-2013 , 11:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BustoRhymes
Monte,

I know... Next time 230x3x10?
230 seems kind of random

Also I think doing reps that are heavy enough to be considered in the intensity range with a predefined locotarding rest period is asking for trouble.

If you actually did TM instead of just shoehorning some moderately heavy reps in in between muscleups and back walkovers, pretty sure you could be benching 275 within a few months.
09-12-2013 , 11:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aidan
some of the whiteknighting by others in that thread is pretty close to as cringeworthy as yeotas posts
well let's not overstate. "pretty close to as cringeworthy as yeotas posts" doesn't exist outside of particle accelerators and far away galaxies.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcb33f
yeota chick has a sick body


Spoiler:


pretty sure you're beta4life when you put on the ball and chain
yeah she is the definition of butterface. body is prettay good.
09-12-2013 , 11:24 AM
Monte,

You're right brah, and I respect. I'm reconfiguring my programming to be legit TM. Don't pay attention to this week. Just dicking around.
09-12-2013 , 11:30 AM
Not running SS with a sub 250 squat does not compute imo.
09-12-2013 , 11:33 AM
I asked everyone for programming suggestions before I decided on TM. We are even FB bros. But maybe I am misremembering and you insisted on SS
09-12-2013 , 11:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BustoRhymes
Just finished the bench 185x10x4 two-minute rest challenge. Wasn't even close to failing this time. Probably nbd to you guys with Wilkes scores over 350, but I gave myself a fist bump.
09-12-2013 , 11:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aidan
Thanks Aidan. This seems to be exactly what I want, but I'm having trouble figuring out how to assign & use hot keys (I think I've assigned correctly, but they're not being used). Do you have experience with it?

ETA: OOO nvm nvm nvm. Figured it out. Awesome. TY TY.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BustoRhymes
I asked everyone for programming suggestions before I decided on TM. We are even FB bros. But maybe I am misremembering and you insisted on SS
Oh it's very possible that I didn't even mention SS. Sometimes I assume knowing the different programs out there is common knowledge, my bad. But regardless, I do stand by this most recent comment, and think SS should carry 90% of people well into the 200s for squat. Many say 300, and I would agree under some circumstances, but I'm being conservative for now.
09-12-2013 , 11:39 AM
TM for upper body and SS style LP for lower body lifts?
09-12-2013 , 11:42 AM
Saw someone at the gym doing Smolov Jr. the other day and he wasn't even squatting 225. Just don't be that guy Busto.
09-12-2013 , 11:44 AM
Monte,

Ohhhhhh that deserves srs consideration.

fredd,

Can't lie, I was already that guy Lookat my log May-June
09-12-2013 , 11:46 AM
BR you could just say **** legs and we can be upper body bros together...?
09-12-2013 , 11:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Montecore
TM for upper body and SS style LP for lower body lifts?
This ainec.
09-12-2013 , 11:48 AM
depends how much progression can be milked out of linear progression. if its just not happening, no issue with making slower but regular progress on TM

      
m