Quote:
[My interpretation of the book is that a light session can help reduce fatique at the same rate if not more than an actual rest day, while at the same time conservating adaptions and honing skill in the lift. I especially like the idea of extra practice, because I probably need it. My percentages for the 5th day light session may need some work though. I can see your point in the hypertrophy block as the fifth day is another overloading session and I can likely get in sufficient volume with 4 lifting days. What do you think about light sessions?]
I'm a bit skeptical of them. Work is work, even if it's easier. Two days of not lifting should facilitate more recovery than one day + one light session. I don't think you need to worry about conserving adaptations when the interval is only two days (i.e. that's more of a deload week concern). There's also just the life factor of adding another lifting day. It's another obligation that could potentially add stress to your routine for dubious benefit. It's not just the work you do in the gym, but the routine of getting up, preparing your clothes/bag, being transported there, and so on. It's an ordeal.
In addition, it's probable that doing perfect technique stuff with lunch boxes on the bar is not specific enough to the heavy work you're trying to get better at anyway, so the practice/technique value is low for a non-novice lifter. In other words, you could tweak the percentages down to make sure the light work doesn't affect recovery, but then it wouldn't achieve what you want. And if you tweaked them up, it more becomes work and it may as well be done heavier at that point. Catch 22 situation.
Quote:
[I agree with that, however from my understanding if you train exclusively hypertrophy or strength, the problem may arrise you start losing either hypertrophy or strength adaptions in opposing blocks. Maybe I'm overthinking this and it's not much of a problem at all, but I tried to prevent that by adding strength and volume days to each block. I did try to set it up that the volume day in the strength block is still high enough intensity to induce strength adaptions and overload through increases in intensity, and the other way around for the hypertrophy block. This is more influenced by the Brendan Tietz stuff on youtube than the book though. Thoughts on this?]
I think when we refer to a "strength" program, what we mean is that strength is the adaptation we want to maximize, but of course, there will still be hypertrophy adaptations and your 1RM will increase. Same with a "hypertrophy" program; you will get stronger and increase your 1RM on high volume/reps, the aim is simply to focus on one type of adaptation over the others.
So there should be little concern of detraining one adaptation by focusing on another one, except possibly with peaking programs, which may have not enough volume to sustain long term hypertrophy in an advanced lifter.
The book's view of DUP as inferior to block periodization is mainly because the book believes strength adaptations take longer than hypertrophy ones (a week plus for strength, compared with a few days for hypertrophy), and are more sensitive to week-to-week accumulating fatigue as well. So a hypertrophy block is going to have more volume and each successive week will be done in a higher state of fatigue, while a strength block will attempt to have you a bit fresher going into each training session so you can hit a PR or rep PR compared to the same week in the last cycle.
Quote:
[Interesting, I figured bumping both intensity and volume throughout the meso was a good way to overload. How would you change it? Agree percentages may be a bit low, but that does give room to increase weekly, perhaps overreach slightly in the last week before deload, and then taper down for the next cycle. Thoughts?]
There are probably a few ways you could do it. In my program, I went for increasing the %1rm, the total number of reps, and the total number of work sets on each week while decreasing the number of reps per set. So week 2 is 4x8 at 70%, then week 3 is 5x7 at 72.5%. Week 3 is probably harder, and it's definitely more work, but the relative intensity (proximity to failure) in each set is about the same as in Week 2. So, in theory, I could go into week 3 at the same performance level as last week and still hit the numbers. An intermediate program shouldn't expect you to be stronger every single workout.
Last edited by Renton555; 05-08-2017 at 01:12 AM.