Quote:
Originally Posted by feel wrath
I've witnessed a veritable epidemic of chest supported curls at my gyms recently.
Given these are standard gen pop gym bros and not advanced BBers looking for any edge, it seems like pure FPS to be investing bicep sets in this vs standard barbell, preacher or hammer curls?
or am i missing something?
worth it. preachers can irritate bicep tendons on either side, hammers don't target the peak at all, standard barbell has way too much forearm. Normal easy also good but a lot of people end up cheating too much so do chest supported instead. Even if you're a regular guy not an advanced bodybuilder, having a flat non peaky bicep doesn't look as good as having a peakier one.
Plus a lot of those gen pop gym bros possibly do want to compete and think they'll be Chris Bumstead 5 years after they start 400mg/wk test e.