NucLOL,

Thought you were gonna DOXX me too!!!

And I totally agree. I've always thought of them like a couplet, but it appears this show is taking over some of the audience from the non-renewed show.

Still hoping we get a Netflix-esque resurrection to finish out the series!

I think "claimed" is probably a better word choice than "admitted" in this case.

...and to change subjects to something lighthearted

Eddie Hall was going to be an olympic swimmer in his teens?!?

Do you know who mikhel05 was? What about Deeply Unhappy? Kelhus999? Kelhus99? Quick_Ben?

Wait, Quick Ben was jdock? I suppose that fits the fantasy character theme.

MIHKEL YOU IGNORANT ****!!!

It will probably agitate both of them but I can never keep jdock & thremp straight. They're different posters, yes?

WHERES NUMBER 1 E BOOK BUYER

WTF

Sometimes

Latest update on Rhoden:

He passed 2 polygraph tests, but this doesn't necessarily mean anything because he may perceive something to be consensual when it's not.

People have claimed to have discovered the identity of the accuser. I won't post it, but she's a bikini competitor and NOT a figure or physique competitor (strike one). She and her whole family were involved in some sort of systematic a mortgage fraud scam where 11 of her family members were found guilty and sentenced. Then there's claims she was wired 100k after making the accusation. No idea if any of that is true or if she's even the real accuser, but if that's the case, things are looking up for our boy Shawn. I mean kinda... he basically can't do the olympia and hope to place well now, but maybe he'll be able to sue the **** out of somebody for all the hassle if he's "proven" not guilty.

Confirmed he had already separated from his wife at that time.

Emoken,

Not sure any of that matters. I thought it was clearly explained to you that basic math/logic can't be used in rape cases to help gauge innocence or guilt and we must assume all men as guilty because otherwise we're disenfranchising women.

I hope that this is clear to you now and you'll toe the line with the rest of your fellow menz.

Wait holy ****, if this goes to trial the jury apparently can't see the woman's criminal record? lmao. Is this true? I don't even lawyer. Although they can apparently google her on their own time? I'm confused as ****.

@DM

Yeah but it's a real head exploder because the manz in question in a POC from a third world poor immigrant family!1!1!1 Maybe if he's trans, gay, or >1% native American maybe that means his innocence. Obviously we can't use anything from this woman's history or characteristics and tendencies to assess her credibility without contributing to this abusive patriarchy.

Victim blaming Obvs

At my new university I was required to take a 2 hour seminar (every incoming student is) that thought me that this is a bad thing to do as well as other useful skills such as determining what is and what is not a sex crime.

Emo,

If you took some time to peruse rape shield laws, you'd probably draw the reasonable conclusion that these exist for victim protection and are pretty k. However, there is a pretty insane group that wants to limit the rights of the accused even further with a literally impenetrable shield. Like "Oh, here are some old photos of bruising on her neck from her exbf's phone, here is an affidavit that these were from sex, and he's gonna confirm for us some of the specifics on how she sustained the exact injuries from this case multiple times during their consensual relationship." would be inadmissible despite it being obviously relevant and currently an exception virtually ever judge would grant.

You'll get added joy reading some of the white knight stupidity if you get better informed (as with all things) since most of them are unaware of the current law and basically just make **** up and argue against it.

The specific example of "having someone go through your entire sexual history on the stand" has been basically false for 30-40+ years in USA#1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_s...#United_States

Also, pretty sure other crimes aren't gonna be considered relevant enough to introduce here esp on the victim side... I mean unless they find actual evidence of her reporting a false rape for cash, in which case LOL. Doubtful she'll ever do any jailtime since you know... #BELIEVEALLWOMEN.

The Case of Al Franken: A close look at the accusations against the former senator.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2...-of-al-franken

Greg,

Please be informed that famous people have never had their careers ruined over "false" accusations. You keep posting links to lots of words with quotes by rape apologists (who are probably rapists themselves).

What about Fatty Arbuckle?

He did most of what he was accused of, except writing the skit specifically for Tweeden and telling the other woman, “It’s my right as an entertainer," (which, imo, are more likely misinterpretations of what he said rather than fabrications by the women), so I don't think any of the accusations were "false."

He probably would have survived an ethics hearing with some censure and sensitivity training, and he ended up with a harsher result then he deserved without his due process. But being a creepy guy who leaves many women uncomfortable and feeling harassed was still going to disqualify him from a presidential run and his ceiling would be senator for life--I mean look at what happened to Kennedy, and he just killed someone by accident--unless he found a way to pivot to the GOP.

Good satire. I enjoyed it.

To be fair Kennedy was also a raging alcoholic which may have been brought up during a presidential campaign after the primaries. You know the old expression, “Accidental murder is on thing, but...”

#believeallwomenalways #maletears #metoo


This patriarchy is so oppressive god damn, we need to get rid of this pesky due process and evidence **** for rape cases. If a woman says she was raped, she was raped and somebody needs to go to jail! Or be castrated and/or killed.
I agree with DM that anything like dozens of pages text messages or emails that corroborate a man's ridiculous narrative that a sexual relationship could have been consensual must never be admissible in court.

Hey guise, consensual mutual masturbation is not triggering to SJWs, so carry on as long as you’d like.

I thought I was a try hard. Jfc.

I actually read an article or paper (not sure which, not even sure if it was legitimate tbh) that suggested that masturbating to the image of someone’s likeness without consent is equivalent of sexual assault.