Quote:
Originally Posted by The Yugoslavian
Wasn't this always the case (low value men having trouble getting laid)? Probably worse in the past where men in power were able to basically corner the market on any high value (good looking) woman they wanted. I'm sure it matters what society we pick but ffs, there were harems where 1 man was tying up hundreds or thousands of women from the rest of the population.
Plus, there were many more hurdles to women having sex with many men. Now there are way fewer (meaning more relative opportunity for all men - of course skewed towards high valued men) so I don't really see why low status males are any worse off than they've always been.
i cant type well on phone and laptop is being repaired. But i have to say social status is far less relevant and facial attractiveness is far more relevant than men want to believe or women wqnt to admit. Women, because on average they are less able to acquire resources, partially because of biology, partially because of institutional barriers and social expectations, choose partners for reasons other than attractiveness. They had to do that a lot in say, 1940, but have to do it a lot less today. Women today even still admit they use tinder for free measls; using varying degrees of sexuality to capitalize on male's better average resource aquisition is literally the worlds eldeet profession. This is why men at the center and left of the attractiveness distribution have far less sexual access than before, women face less of a gap in resource aquisition ability and can focus on what actualy turns them on; face, height, body in tgat order. I'll depart from most who recognize this and say this isnt necessarily bad, but a few things should change.
1. Legalize and subsidize prostitution.
2. Less shaming of men who fail to attrqct a partner or maintain a relationship. Make everyone brutally aware tgat most men in this situation are simply too ugly, they mqy not have some sort of character flaw or personal defixiency or need to lwarn pua or play weird social status jockeying games. Most people know that the rare female incel is simply ugky or fat. Why send tge mesage that incel males have some personal deficiency when often its a physsical factor over which they have varying amounts of control, (sometimes none).
Remember also tgat every mass shooter gets oodles of fanmail and sexual solicitation from attractive young females... Female sexuality is just as dark as male, maybe more.
On sexual assault perceuved uptick I mostly agree with yugo. Part of it is more reporring of real sex crimes and awareness of one's rights, but part is just more female hysteria. And part is just men with low self awareness who are ugly being fed tge confidence lie and creeping out women who arent even in tge same realm of attractiveness by not reading disinterest and powing forward.
Last edited by Evoken; 04-24-2018 at 10:00 PM.