Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet

10-02-2018 , 09:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidcolin
He's referring to the fact you lost 30lbs.
I know I thought the only variable was going WFPB

Either way he makes a valid point it could have been anything and I’m not going to say I did an exact study as I wasn’t tracking anything so you got me there
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
10-02-2018 , 10:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by downtown
Adorable idea of how calories work.
The body is so much more complex than to just counting calories.. the food we eat has covalent bonds w water so it’s not just about a calorie in vs calorie out formula it’s closer to how the food interacts with our body. Certain food hydrates us like WFPB fruits and vegetables with naturally occurring water bonds and certain foods dries us out like processed food with preservatives , dry cooked meat, dry salty cheese where water is literally cooked out of your food forcing you to have to drink water which isn’t bonded to anything which makes the whole vicious cycle. It’s important to eat food that hydrates you. If you want to live GTO I think WFPB is key to doing it.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
10-02-2018 , 10:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjr777
The body is so much more complex than to just counting calories.. the food we eat has covalent bonds w water so it’s not just about a calorie in vs calorie out formula it’s closer to how the food interacts with our body. Certain food hydrates us like WFPB fruits and vegetables with naturally occurring water bonds and certain foods dries us out like processed food with preservatives , dry cooked meat, dry salty cheese where water is literally cooked out of your food forcing you to have to drink water which isn’t bonded to anything which makes the whole vicious cycle. It’s important to eat food that hydrates you. If you want to live GTO I think WFPB is key to doing it.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
10-02-2018 , 10:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by downtown
Lmao
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
10-02-2018 , 10:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gorilla4Sale
Showing me a crossfitter who's 5'8" and 190lbs is supposed to change my mind? We clearly have different definitions of small and weak, lol.

But, I'm sure there are one or two outliers somewhere. That clearly proves your point.
Don't know if you watched the video, but he said that he had a lot more energy now, though. I'm pretty sure I've read in H&F that this is the single most important factor in what diet is good, feeling like you have a lot more energy.

Maybe give it a try and see how it feels? Maybe you can become as big as that guy.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
10-02-2018 , 10:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fabian
Don't know if you watched the video, but he said that he had a lot more energy now, though. I'm pretty sure I've read in H&F that this is the single most important factor in what diet is good, feeling like you have a lot more energy.
lol, more energy and sharpened mental state. We're all seeking it.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Fabian
Maybe give it a try and see how it feels? Maybe you can become as big as that guy.
I suspect that's exactly what would happen if I switched to that diet, I'd lose 50+ pounds of muscle.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
10-02-2018 , 10:43 AM
But just think of all that energy you would feel!
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
10-02-2018 , 10:47 AM
Maybe if G4S went with the Literally Only Chickpeas Diet* (LOCD), he would keep his gains.

Last edited by Renton555; 10-02-2018 at 10:48 AM. Reason: (*) From the creators of Literally Only Tofu Diet (LOTD).
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
10-02-2018 , 10:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjr777
There’s observable repeatable demonstrable provable science and then there’s a whole belief system of scientism
Wait, what side are you on here?
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
10-02-2018 , 11:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILOVEPOKER929
... the healthiest plant milk is Westsoy plain unsweetened soymilk. It's a true whole food product. All it has in it is water and soybeans. You can find this product at Whole Foods and Sprouts. It's not at Kroger afaik.
I am allergic to soy. Every time I eat any of it, I get the runs. Aside from that, soy raises estrogen levels. I've had several doctors and a nutritionist tell me to keep eating beef. Grass fed beef is the best food for me.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
10-02-2018 , 11:11 AM
Grass fed beef is lol... how’s the cow getting enough protein?
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
10-02-2018 , 11:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Didace
Wait, what side are you on here?
Observable science like our teeth are flat so better design for eating WFPB
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
10-02-2018 , 11:15 AM
If someone ingests enough soy to raise their estrogen levels......well, are they even eating anything else, ever?
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
10-02-2018 , 11:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjr777
Observable science like our teeth are flat so better design for eating WFPB
http://time.com/4252373/meat-eating-veganism-evolution/

Also, as an alternative fact/anecdotal truth, I have pointy teeth.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
10-02-2018 , 11:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapini
http://time.com/4252373/meat-eating-veganism-evolution/

Also, as an alternative fact/anecdotal truth, I have pointy teeth.
One question and this should undermine that entire article...

How did they know what people ate 2.6m years ago?

This is clear evidence of scientism with no first hand proof whatsoever..

I’m willing to debate food all day using actual observable evidence.. but to make claims about something 2.6m years ago and pass it off as fact is not science.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
10-02-2018 , 11:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjr777
One question and this should undermine that entire article...

How did they know what people ate 2.6m years ago?

This is clear evidence of scientism with no first hand proof whatsoever..

I’m willing to debate food all day using actual observable evidence.. but to make claims about something 2.6m years ago and pass it off as fact is not science.
I didn't pass it off as fact. I added it to the thread for your consideration. But I'm guessing you'll give it the same consideration that I've given your "dinosaurs are fake" assertion.

I still have pointy teeth though. Hard to argue with those.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
10-02-2018 , 02:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Didace
Wait, what side are you on here?
It says in his location.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
10-02-2018 , 07:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjr777
In my experience 34 years of eating animal products being fat and sluggish ovs 1.5 years of being lean and having energy and just overall feeling better
If you at plants at maintenance and still were fat do you predict you would have experienced the same positive benefits?

Just like OP the benefits came with LOSING WEIGHT. So which was it?

edit: slow pony I guess
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
10-03-2018 , 01:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidcolin
his study on that: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21883530

he's misreporting again. this wasn't the method:


or, he's not being exact in his language. He just had two groups, both eating whatever they want for 8 weeks, except 1 group had to eat 340kcal worth of fig & nut bars. This wasn't a calorie controlled study at all. All it means is the group who ate the 340kcal of fig & nuts didn't eat something else they normally would have.

Groundbreaking study.
Yes, exactly. It wasn't calorie controlled. That was the entire point. People tend to get nervous about adding calorically dense stuff like dried fruit and nuts to their diet. They worry that they'll gain weight. What the study showed was IF you add a 340 calorie dried fruit & nut bar you will not gain weight over an 8 week period because your body will properly adjust by not "eat[ing] something else they normally would have". You may not be impressed, but those nervous about snacking on dried fruit and nuts will be.

Also, keep in mind this is not how it works with meat. You add meat to your diet and you will get fatter.

Quote:
Meat is considered fattening due to its caloric density and fat content, but nuts are also packed with calories and fat. As I noted in a previous post, Nuts Don’t Cause Expected Weight Gain, so maybe we shouldn’t presume. As you can see in my 3-min. video Meat and Weight Gain in the PANACEA Study, one of the largest nutrition studies ever performed put the question of meat and weight gain to the test.

Not only was meat consumption significantly associated with weight gain in both men and women, the link remained even after controlling for calories. That means if you have two people eating the same amount of calories, the person eating the most meat would gain more weight. The researchers even calculated how much more and which meat was associated with the most weight gain above and beyond the caloric content.

The National Cattlemen’s Beef Association was not happy about these findings. As I detail in my 2-min. video Cattlemen’s Association Has Beef With EPIC Study, a meat industry representative argued that the pounds that the meat-eaters packed on may have been muscle mass, not fat. Maybe they were becoming beefier, not fatter.

Fine, the researcher responded, they’d rerun the numbers to not just measure obesity, but abdominal obesity–the worst kind. They took a small sample out of the study, a sample of 91,214 people (that’s how big the study was!) and found the exact same thing. Even when eating the same number of calories, the more meat we eat the more our belly grows. They could even calculate how much our waistline would be expected to expand based on our daily meat consumption. Now folks can plan ahead for the new pants they’ll need to buy!
Source.

And besides inevitable weight gain, adding meat to one's diet causes all kinds of problems:

Quote:
To see what effect an increase in meat consumption might have on disease rates, researchers studied lapsed vegetarians. People who once ate vegetarian diets but then started to eat meat at least once a week were reported to have experienced a 146 percent increase in odds of heart disease, a 152 percent increase in stroke, a 166 percent increase in diabetes, and a 231 percent increase in odds for weight gain. During the 12 years after the transition from vegetarian to omnivore, meat-eating was associated with a 3.6 year decrease in life expectancy.

Results published in 2012 from two major Harvard University studies—the Nurses’ Health Study, which followed the diets of about 120,000 30- to 55-year-old women starting in 1976, and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study, which followed about 50,000 men aged 40 to 75—found that the consumption of both processed and unprocessed red meat appeared to be associated with an increased risk of dying from cancer and heart disease, as well as shortened life spans overall—a conclusion reached even after controlling for age, weight, alcohol consumption, exercise, smoking, family history, caloric intake, and even the intake of whole plant foods, such as whole grains, fruits, and vegetables. The findings suggest there may be something harmful in the meat itself.

The largest study of diet and health was co-sponsored by the National Institutes of Health and the American Association of Retired Persons. Over a decade, researchers followed about 545,000 men and women aged 50 to 71 and came to the same conclusion as the Harvard researchers: Meat consumption was associated with increased risk of dying from cancer, dying from heart disease, and dying prematurely in general. Again, this was after controlling for other diet and lifestyle factors.

Alzheimer’s disease risk may also be affected by meat consumption. In Japan, the prevalence of Alzheimer’s has shot up over the past few decades, thought to be due to the shift from a traditional rice-and-vegetable-based diet to one featuring triple the dairy and six times the meat. The lowest validated rates of Alzheimer’s disease in the world are found in rural India, where people tend to eat plant-based diets centered on grains and vegetables. In the United States, those who don’t eat meat (including poultry and fish) appear to cut their risk of developing dementia in half, and the longer meat is avoided, the lower dementia risk appears to fall.
Source.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
10-03-2018 , 01:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gorilla4Sale
Showing me a crossfitter who's 5'8" and 190lbs is supposed to change my mind? We clearly have different definitions of small and weak, lol.

But, I'm sure there are one or two outliers somewhere. That clearly proves your point.
Don't need to prove anything, just trying to refute the implied notion that all plant based people are "small and weak". Outliers will suffice.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
10-03-2018 , 01:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjr777
Oh and food tastes better when you become plant based..

Anyone arguing against plant based who hasn’t tried it for a month has no clue.
I had the same experience. After going WFPB for just a few weeks, it's amazing how good an orange or a peach or an apple tastes. All food just seems to taste better. People seem to forget or are not aware that food corporations have basically hijacked our taste buds from birth. A good book on the subject: "Salt Sugar Fat" by Michael Moss.

That said, the coolest thing is you can win your taste buds back in just a few weeks. People drastically underestimate how pliable their palettes are.

ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
10-03-2018 , 01:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renton555
People are evidently having trouble convincing you of what's healthy and what isn't. Nothing wrong with high fat diets as long as calories are controlled. Fat is an acceptable source of fuel for the body. I'm not a keto advocate but I'm quite sure that one could live a totally healthy life and keep weight under control with a low-carb diet.

I think the problem is rooted in the word healthy, especially as it is applied to specific foods instead of overall lifestyles.
I wouldn't say fat is an acceptable source, it's an essential source! The question is what kind of fat? Are we eating healthy fats like avocados, nuts and seeds or are we getting our fat from disease causing sources: meat, dairy, eggs, free oils. Food after all is a packaged deal. You can choose to get your fat in packages that come with health promoting fiber, antioxidants, and other phytonutrients or you can get your fat from packages that give you cancer, heart disease, erectile dysfunction, dementia, shorter life span, etc.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
10-03-2018 , 02:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjr777
I figured these smart high iq degens would get it but they don’t and most never will.
Maybe the problem is their IQs aren't high enough!!

ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
10-03-2018 , 02:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Very Josie
My experience is similar. I lost a lot of weight and no longer eat crap food, so now fruit tastes so sweet to me. All the food I eat tastes really good and different than before, so much so it's surprising. Yet I do eat meat, cheese and fish.

Like someone said before, the animal cruelty thing is what gets to me. I was reading something and saw cheese described as "congealed animal pain" which does give me the sads.
First I want to say congratulations on eating healthier! And I also want to point out what can tend to get lost in this discussion. This is not a black and white/all or nothing situation. Obviously you already know that I think you should ditch the meat, cheese and fish but it is still true that any move in the right direction will be better for your health and longevity. Specifically, the more whole plants you add to your diet the healthier you will be EVEN IF you still eat some meat, cheese, and fish.

For me personally giving up cheese was the hardest. Ditching meat and cow's milk was easy. I haven't read this book yet but you might wanna give it a try:

"The Cheese Trap: How Breaking a Surprising Addiction Will Help You Lose Weight, Gain Energy, and Get Healthy" by Neal Barnard
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
10-03-2018 , 03:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cha59
I am allergic to soy. Every time I eat any of it, I get the runs.
Ok then use almond milk with your cereal. What you don't wanna do is use cow's milk, rice milk or coconut milk.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cha59
Aside from that, soy raises estrogen levels..
Yeah I think that's a myth. Yes soy is loaded with phytoestrogens but that's a good thing not a bad thing:

Quote:
Tofu, soymilk, miso, tempeh, edamame—these and other soy products, including the soybeans themselves, are high in nutrients you tend to associate with other legumes, including fiber, iron, magnesium, potassium, protein, and zinc.

Soybeans naturally contain a class of phytoestrogens called isoflavones. People hear the word “estrogen” in the word “phytoestrogens” and assume that means soy has estrogen-like effects. Not necessarily. Estrogen has positive effects in some tissues and potentially negative effects in others. For example, high levels of estrogen can be good for the bones but can increase the likelihood of developing breast cancer. Ideally, you’d like what’s called a “selective estrogen receptor modulator” in your body that would have proestrogenic effects in some tissues and antiestrogenic effects in others. Well, that’s what soy phytoestrogens appear to be. Soy seems to lower breast cancer risk, an antiestrogenic effect, but can also help reduce menopausal hot-flash symptoms, a proestrogenic effect. So, by eating soy, you may be able to enjoy the best of both worlds.

What about soy for women with breast cancer? Overall, researchers have found that women diagnosed with breast cancer who ate the most soy lived significantly longer and had a significantly lower risk of breast cancer recurrence than those who ate less. The quantity of phytoestrogens found in just a single cup of soymilk may reduce the risk of breast cancer returning by 25 percent. The improvement in survival for those eating more soy foods was found both in women whose tumors were responsive to estrogen (estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer) and those whose tumors were not (estrogen-receptor negative breast cancer). This also held true for both young women and older women. In one study, for example, 90 percent of the breast cancer patients who ate the most soy phytoestrogens after diagnosis were still alive five years later, while half of those who ate little to no soy were dead.

Soy consumption has also been shown to benefit our kidneys, which appear to handle plant protein very differently from animal protein. Within hours of eating meat, our kidneys rev up into hyperfiltration mode. But, an equivalent amount of plant protein causes virtually no noticeable stress on the kidneys. Eat some tuna, and within three hours, your kidney filtration rate can shoot up 36 percent. But eating the same amount of protein in the form of tofu doesn’t appear to place any additional strain on the kidneys.
Source.

Ok but what about men eating soy!:

Quote:
Phytoestrogens are estrogen-like compounds found in a variety of plant foods such as beans, seeds, and grains, though they are concentrated in soy foods and flax. Phytoestrogens appear to be helpful in the prevention of diabetes and cancers of the colon, liver, brain, breast, ovaries, and skin. “Bad” cholesterol appears to be reduced, cardiovascular risk decreased, and weight loss increased when they are consumed. Soy phytoestrogens do not decrease male fertility; however, xenoestrogens, which are found mainly in fish, have been shown to drastically lower sperm counts. Replacing dairy with soy may decrease abdominal fat.
Another tidbit:

Quote:
What about soybeans, though? The phytoestrogens in soy protect against cancer—both men and women—but might they decrease male fertility? Fox News thinks so, and they’re “Fair and Balanced.”

Fact, or fiction? Fiction, and it’s interesting why. The study did find that soy decreased sperm concentration, but did not significantly affect the sperm count itself. How can you have the same number of sperm, but a lower concentration? Because of a larger ejaculate volume. Soy appears to stimulate the prostate gland to produce a larger load of ejaculate fluid, but the actual number of sperm remains the same.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cha59
I've had several doctors and a nutritionist tell me to keep eating beef. Grass fed beef is the best food for me.
Unfortunately in terms of human health consuming grass fed beef doesn't really change much. All the reasons beef is bad for you still apply. Whether meat is organic or not doesn't really appear to matter either:



Here's the transcript of the above video:

Quote:
This study, on “the carcinogenic risk associated with the intake of” various meats, estimated the risk was so great that we may not want to feed beef, pork, or chicken to kids more than like five times a month. This was in Europe, where lamb contamination is a particular problem. In the United States, if there was any standout, it would be chicken and PBDEs (flame-******ant chemicals)—not only compared to other meats, but other countries. U.S. chickens are like 10-20 times more contaminated than the samples taken from other countries that have been tested—though diet is not the only source of exposure, as those eating vegetarian have only about 25% lower levels in their bloodstream than those eating meat, though a large proportion of the levels in omnivores may be from chicken.

For other chemicals, diet may play a larger role. Studies of the “pollutants in [the] breast milk of vegetarians” dating back over 30 years have found the average vegetarian levels of some pollutants were “only 1 to 2 per cent as high as the [national] average.” In fact, for the six out of seven pollutants they looked at, there wasn’t even overlap in the range of scores; “the highest vegetarian value was lower than the lowest value obtained in the [general population].” This is presumed to be because these pollutants concentrate up the food chain. So, by eating lots from all the way down the food chain—plants—those eating vegetarian may “have an edge.”

For example, dioxins. “Meat, fish, and dairy are believed to contribute almost all of the dioxin body [exposure].” And, indeed, if you look at those eating strictly plant-based diets, they may only have about a third of the levels of dioxins and PCBs, or even less than a fifth, circulating throughout their bodies.

This study really struck me. “India has been facing a major problem of treating its [millions of pounds of electronic] waste” every year. And, these poor workers at these electronic waste recycling plants can be exposed to high levels of toxic chemicals, ending up with this kind of concentration of PCBs in their bloodstream—nearly twice as high as those living about 250 miles away along the coast. But these were non-vegetarian workers at the waste plant. The PCB levels of the vegetarians working at the same plant was even lower.

The problem with these cross-sectional studies is that we can’t single out the diet. Maybe vegetarians have other lifestyle behaviors that protect them. You don’t know until you put it to the test. Change people’s diets and see what happens.

That’s hard to do with persistent pollutants like PCBs, which may take literally decades to detoxify from the body. But, we can get rid of heavy metals, like mercury, in a matter of months. And, indeed, within three months of “the exclusion of meat, poultry, fish and eggs” from their diets, there was a significant drop in the levels of toxic heavy metals in their bodies, including mercury, cadmium, and lead.” Up to about a 30% drop within three months.

What if we just stick to organic meat? Certified organic meat comes from” livestock [that are] fed with organically produced feed that is free of pesticides and animal by-products,” by law. Therefore, one would assume “that there should be [a] lower accumulation of chemical residues.” However, on a practical level, there were simply “no studies on the chemical residues’ content in organic meat”—until, now.

Researchers “acquired 76 samples of [different kinds of] meat, both organic and conventional, and “quantified their levels of contamination with 33 different carcinogenic [persistent organic pollutants].”

After all, “the ingestion of food contributes more than 90% to the total current exposure to these compounds, especially…food [of] animal origin.” “On the other hand, an increasing number of consumers” are choosing organic. In fact, “organic food production increased by 50% during the last decade.” So, are consumers of organic meat protected, or not?

Well, “no sample was completely free of carcinogenic contaminants,” which is to be expected, given how polluted our world is these days. But, what was surprising was that “the differences between organically and conventionally produced meats were minimal.” Furthermore, “the current pattern of meat consumption exceeded the maximum limits” either way.

“Strikingly, the consumption of organically produced meat [not only] does not appear to diminish this carcinogenic risk,” but was sometimes found to “be even higher.” Bottom line, sadly, is that the “[c]onsumption of organic meat does not diminish the carcinogenic potential associated with the intake of [these pollutants].”
Also, it's not surprising that your doctor(s) keep telling you to eat meat. For one thing they probably eat meat themselves which already clouds matters. Let's not forget that not too long ago in the mid 20th century doctors we're saying cigarette smoking was A-OK, and part of the reason they were saying that is cuz they smoked themselves. But the real problem is just plain ignorance:



Transcript:

Quote:
The World Health Organization blames literally millions of deaths every year on inadequate fruit and vegetable intake. Almost as deadly as smoking. So if we care enough about ourselves and our families to not want to die a horrific death from smoking, we should put the same effort into eating more fruits and vegetables. We should eat fruits and vegetables as if our lives depended on it, because in a way they do.

Why haven’t many of us heard of this change from 5 A Day to 9 A Day? Well, the Federal Government spends about $10 million a year to educate people about healthy eating. Candy corporations spend about twice that amount just launching a new candy bar. Okay, but why don’t most doctors pass this information along? Because, odds are, your doctor never learned any of this. Less than a quarter of medical schools have even a single dedicated course on nutrition, and less than six percent of graduating physicians may have received any formal nutrition training. Out of thousands of hours of pre-clinical instruction, your doctor may have gotten an average of three hours of nutrition training. There was even a study published in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition that pitted doctors versus patients in a head-to-head test of basic nutrition knowledge—simple true or false questions. Guess who won? The patients. People off the street knew more about nutrition than their doctors, yet people still ask their doctors for nutrition advice.

What doctors may be telling their patients to eat may be killing them. It wasn’t too long ago that doctors were advising pregnant women to smoke cigarettes to help with morning sickness. Until doctors are taught more about nutrition, their advising us about diet may be physician-assisted suicide.

There is one doctor though, everyone trusts. Perhaps the most famous physician of all time: Dr. Benjamin Spock. Always on the forefront of important social issues. And in the final edition of his book, the bestselling book in American history (second only to the Bible), he recommended that all children be raised on meat- and dairy-free diets to prevent diseases like cancer.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote

      
m