Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet

09-28-2018 , 03:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidcolin
We weren't designed to consume b12 tho.
Ummm, yes we were. Humans, have evolved a dependency for B12 just like Vitamin C, etc. B12 is just bacteria that envelops the earth. For most of human existence we probably got all the B12 we needed just drinking out of streams, lakes, or eating dirty plants and insects. Well given that we've poisoned virtually all our freshwater supplies, and um, I don't wanna eat dirty veggies and insects, and the fact that our water supply is sanitized (which is a good thing), it's best to supplement. I suppose you could possibly satisfy your B12 needs drinking well water, but given the horrible memories I have of summer camp, I'm gonna pass on that dubious idea.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
09-28-2018 , 03:31 PM
He’s being sarcastic. His point was we weren’t “designed” at all. We evolved, DUH
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
09-28-2018 , 03:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Didace
ILP929,


Try supporting your position with a variety of sources. Perhaps even some studies that have been peer reviewed.
To find the sources of any nutritionfacts.org video, just go to the actual site to watch the video, click on "source" underneath the video and you'll see the studies the author is referencing in the video. I only go through youtube cuz I can embed from there.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
09-28-2018 , 03:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TTGL
He’s being sarcastic. His point was we weren’t “designed” at all. We evolved, DUH
ITT I'm using the words "designed" and "evolved" interchangeably.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
09-28-2018 , 03:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILOVEPOKER929
What good is being on the only diet proven to reverse our #1 killer, heart disease--something drugs/surgery cannot do--
Are you purposefully misleading, or just don't understand?

Quote:
Originally Posted by downtown
Quote:
Originally Posted by downtown
Hey bud you completely ignored my post!

So I'll quote in part:
Quote:
It is ludicrous to interpret that research as showing that a plant-based diet can completely prevent heart attacks. A more accurate interpretation is that patients (only a few patients in one study) who had already had a heart attack did not have a second heart attack while being treated with cholesterol-lowering medications and a diet that was largely plant-based but also included foods derived from animals.
-----------
Even better...
"This new study from China, for example"... looooooooooooool. Lol emphasis mine.
http://skepdic.com/chinastudy.html

In before Skepdic is funded by the cheese magnates of wall st. Hope to PLOKJ there is a good nutritionfact youtube about this! Can't wait!
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
09-28-2018 , 06:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILOVEPOKER929
ITT I'm using the words "designed" and "evolved" interchangeably.
Because you’re dumb? Or are just being intentionally misleading? These words don’t mean the same thing. I don’t see how you can defend this

Last edited by TTGL; 09-28-2018 at 06:16 PM.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
09-28-2018 , 06:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILOVEPOKER929
To find the sources of any nutritionfacts.org video, just go to the actual site to watch the video, click on "source" underneath the video and you'll see the studies the author is referencing in the video. I only go through youtube cuz I can embed from there.
So that's a no then. Gotcha.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
09-28-2018 , 07:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TTGL
Because you’re dumb? Or are just being intentionally misleading? These words don’t mean the same thing. I don’t see how you can defend this
Come on man. Let's not be ridiculous. I am not a creationist. I've read nearly all the Richard Dawkins books and loved them. I understand how evolution works. If you can't follow along then you don't need to participate in the thread.

So for example when I say something like "The fact that bacon causes cancer in humans is strong evidence that humans are not designed to eat it what I'm saying is exactly equivalent to saying, "The fact that bacon causes cancer in humans is strong evidence that humans have not evolved to eat it.

Again I'm using the word design in the darwinian sense. Like it should be obvious we are not designed to eat SAD (standard american diet) given that this diet is making us one of the fattest and sickest countries in world history.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
09-28-2018 , 08:23 PM
“Bacon causing cancer” isn’t a fact jackass, if you don’t want negative responses perhaps stop talking out of your ass

Furthermore humans didn’t evolve to eat or not eat specific foods. Humans ate specific foods while they were evolving, and continue to do so. Do you understand the difference now? Seems those Dawkins books did you no good at all

I see nothing morally wrong with eating other animals either so I’ll oppose that unstoppable argument too

Last edited by TTGL; 09-28-2018 at 08:32 PM.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
09-28-2018 , 08:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TTGL
“Bacon causing cancer” isn’t a fact jackass, if you don’t want negative responses perhaps stop talking out of your ass
Seriously? So it's not just cheese, people here are going to bat for bacon now too? Sweet forum you guys have here.

Anyways, more on processed meat for that theoretical one lurker out there that might care:

Quote:
"8. Processed meat was classified as Group 1, carcinogenic to humans. What does this mean?

This category is used when there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in humans. In other words, there is convincing evidence that the agent causes cancer. The evaluation is usually based on epidemiological studies showing the development of cancer in exposed humans.

In the case of processed meat, this classification is based on sufficient evidence from epidemiological studies that eating processed meat causes colorectal cancer.

9. Processed meat was classified as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1). Tobacco smoking and asbestos are also both classified as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1). Does it mean that consumption of processed meat is as carcinogenic as tobacco smoking and asbestos?

No, processed meat has been classified in the same category as causes of cancer such as tobacco smoking and asbestos (IARC Group 1, carcinogenic to humans), but this does NOT mean that they are all equally dangerous. The IARC classifications describe the strength of the scientific evidence about an agent being a cause of cancer, rather than assessing the level of risk."
Source.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
09-28-2018 , 08:39 PM
Yeah I had definitely heard that bacon was carcinogenic. That was a sad, sad day.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
09-28-2018 , 08:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rexx14
Yeah I had definitely heard that bacon was carcinogenic. That was a sad, sad day.
Bro, don't be so pessimistic. There's still a chance the WHO is infiltrated by too many vegan zealots.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
09-28-2018 , 09:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILOVEPOKER929
Bro, don't be so pessimistic. There's still a chance the WHO is infiltrated by too many vegan zealots.
We can only hope!
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
09-30-2018 , 09:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Didace
ILP929,


Try supporting your position with a variety of sources. Perhaps even some studies that have been peer reviewed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILOVEPOKER929 View Post
To find the sources of any nutritionfacts.org video, just go to the actual site to watch the video, click on "source" underneath the video and you'll see the studies the author is referencing in the video. I only go through youtube cuz I can embed from there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Didace
So that's a no then. Gotcha.
That's the entire purpose of the site nutritionfacts.org, to break down "the latest in nutrition research via bite-sized videos", I.E. to show us peer reviewed studies on food and other health topics in an easy to digest format. So like I said before, if you want to see the peer reviewed studies that are referred to in these videos, just click on "source" underneath the video. If that's too big of a step for you then so be it.

Here's an example. Take this video:



Here's the direct link to that video: https://nutritionfacts.org/video/pla...-for-diabetes/

Click on that, then scroll below the video and click on sources, this is what you'll see in hyperlink:

Quote:
K Khavand, H Amer, B Ibrahim, J Brownrigg. Strategies for preventing type 2 diabetes: an update for clinicians. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2013 Sep;4(5):242-61.

H Kahleova, T Hrachovinova, M Hill, T Pelikanova. Vegetarian diet in type 2 diabetes--improvement in quality of life, mood and eating behaviour. Diabet Med. 2013 Jan;30(1):127-9.

R E Pratley. The early treatment of type 2 diabetes. Am J Med. 2013 Sep;126(9 Suppl 1):S2-9.

N D Barnard, A R Scialli, G Turner-McGrievy, A J Lanou, J Glass. The effects of a low-fat, plant-based dietary intervention on body weight, metabolism, and insulin sensitivity. Am J Med. 2005 Sep;118(9):991-7.

C B Trapp, N D Barnard. Usefulness of vegetarian and vegan diets for treating type 2 diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2010 Apr;10(2):152-8.

N D Barnard, J Cohen, D Jenkins, G Turner-McGrievy, L Gloede, B Jaster B, K Seidl, A A Green, S Talpers. A low-fat vegan diet improves glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors in a randomized clinical trial in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006 Aug;29(8):1777-83.

H Kahleova, M Matoulek, H Malinska, O Oliyarnik, L Kazdova, T Neskudla, A Skoch, M Hajek, M Hill, M Kahle, T Pelikanova. Vegetarian diet improves insulin resistance and oxidative stress markers more than conventional diet in subjects with Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2011 May;28(5):549-59.

D Li. Effect of the vegetarian diet on non-communicable diseases. J Sci Food Agric. 2014 Jan 30;94(2):169-73.
Just to drive home the "peer reviewed study" part:

Quote:
About NutritionFacts.org

Whenever there is a new drug or surgical procedure, you can be assured that you or your doctor will probably hear about it because there’s a corporate budget driving its promotion. But what about advances in the field of nutrition? The reason we don’t see ads on TV for broccoli is the same reason groundbreaking research on the power of foods and eating patterns to affect our health and longevity gets lost and buried in the medical literature–there’s no profit motive. It may not make anyone money, but what if our lives would profit?

Did you know there are diets proven to not only prevent and treat but reverse our #1 killer, heart disease, along with other deadly diseases such as type 2 diabetes and high blood pressure? Yet doctors get little if any formal nutrition training in medical school, graduating without some of the most powerful tools available to stop the chronic diseases that remain our leading causes of death and disability.

We believe that a significant part of the problem is that individuals who want to make the correct dietary choices for themselves and their families are faced with a deluge of confusing and conflicting nutritional advice. The goal of this website is to present you and your doctor with the results of the latest in peer-reviewed nutrition and health research, presented in a way that is easy to understand.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
09-30-2018 , 09:17 PM
I'd be interested in any fairly high protein WFBD recipes you might have.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
09-30-2018 , 09:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rexx14
Yeah I had definitely heard that bacon was carcinogenic. That was a sad, sad day.
Curious on your thoughts on something else (Others are free to chime in of course):

Ok, so I think it's safe to say for rational people who care about their health and are privileged enough to do something about it, processed meat is off the menu (sorry Subway). After all, we're not talking about random vegan hippy zealots telling us processed meat is disease causing--who could easily just be trying to trick us into not eating cute fury things. We're talking about the World Health Organization. Now we know the WHO could certainly be wrong about anything, humans gonna human, but we're still talking about one of the most prestigious sources on the planet, and when our health is on the line it certainly doesn't seem wise to keep eating that bacon hoping the WHO missed something in their assessment of hundreds of studies on the subject. I think you already agree with me on this.

But what about red meat, defined by the WHO as "all mammalian muscle meat, including, beef, veal, pork, lamb, mutton, horse, and goat"?

This is what the WHO said about red meat:

Quote:
Red meat

After thoroughly reviewing the accumulated scientific literature, a Working Group of 22 experts from 10 countries convened by the IARC Monographs Programme classified the consumption of red meat as probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A), based on limited evidence that the consumption of red meat causes cancer in humans and strong mechanistic evidence supporting a carcinogenic effect.
Source.

Quote:
7. Red meat was classified as Group 2A, probably carcinogenic to humans. What does this mean exactly?

In the case of red meat, the classification is based on limited evidence from epidemiological studies showing positive associations between eating red meat and developing colorectal cancer as well as strong mechanistic evidence.

Limited evidence means that a positive association has been observed between exposure to the agent and cancer but that other explanations for the observations (technically termed chance, bias, or confounding) could not be ruled out.
Source.

Now, assuming we apply the precautionary principle on ourselves, given that "scientific investigation has found a plausible risk" with consuming red meat after looking at "more than 700 epidemiological studies....on red meat"(#25), and assuming we care about our health, wouldn't the most rational course of action be to not eat red meat at all, at least until "further scientific findings emerge that provide sound evidence that no harm will result."??

Is it time to say red meat is off the menu along with processed meat? Again, this isn't some sinister vegan doctor secretly working for Big Broccoli trying to brainwash us. This is the World Health Organization we're talking about here.

Curious what you and others think.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
09-30-2018 , 10:48 PM
I made some non-processed meat tonight for dinner.

https://www.101cookingfortwo.com/eas...hicken-thighs/

Holy ****, was it delicious. Easily the best grilled chicken I've ever had.

And the best part? I didn't die.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
09-30-2018 , 10:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rexx14
I'd be interested in any fairly high protein WFBD recipes you might have.
First of all, have you ever seen how much protein is in bean or lentil pasta?

Here's the amount of protein in pasta made out of red lentils.: 20 grams of protein per 3oz serving!

There are 22 grams of protein per 3oz serving of pasta made out of black beans!!

So next time you make pasta, try using noodles made out of beans or lentils, then no matter what else you add to the pasta it's already gonna be loaded with protein. Here's a pasta recipe I sent to a friend and my dad who both wanted to go WFPBed, It's verbatim except for the note I made for you.

Quote:
My pasta recipe:


Get a large pan.


1) Peel and chop a whole garlic bulb and throw into pan (for any of these steps there's usually a how to video online).

2) Peel and chop a whole red onion and throw into pan. (if you wanna add more than 1 onion go for it)

3) Optional extra credit: Clean and chop up a leek and/or a shallot and throw into pan also.


Start sauteeing the chopped garlic and onions in your pan. Just add some Pacific low sodium veggie broth or you can water saute, also spice up with Italian Seasoning.


4) While that's sauteeing, peel off the leafs from the stems from a bunch of fresh black kale. Break the leafs into small pieces, put them in a strainer to wash and then put them in the sauteing pan. Add more italian seasoning and probably more veggie broth (but not too much or it will turn into a soup).


5) Clean and chop a bell pepper (red, orange or yellow). Throw that in the pan.

6) Buy frozen mushrooms. Throw a bag or two into the pan.

7) Optional: Buy Organic frozen yellow corn and organic frozen broccoli, and throw some in pan too. They cook fast so you can throw them in the pan even late in the process.


After sauteeing for around 10 minutes (just a guess), go ahead and put 2 jars of your Engine 2 Organic Tomato Basil Sauce.


8) Add 1 jar of organic tomato paste. Stir in.

9) Put your beans into a strainer and rinse with water, then add them to pan.

Rexx: This step is only necessary if you're using whole grain noodles. If you're already using pasta made out of beans or lentils then you don't have to add beans. Altho adding more beans will certainly up the protein number big time.

10) Add 1 tsp of cayenne pepper, 1 tbsp of crushed red pepper, 1 tsp of oregano, 1 tsp of thyme, 1 tsp of basil, and 2 bay leaves. Mix it all in.

11) Once the pot starts bubbling, turn down the heat to simmer or close to it, and stirr off and on.

12) Get another decent sized pan, and fill it with water and boil it. Once it's boiling throw your bean/lentil noodles in (follow the directions on the box).

13) When you throw your noodles into the boiling water, turn off the heat for your pasta, let it sit now, that way it wont be too hot when you first eat it.

14) When the noodles are done just throw them into the sauce and mix it all together.

15) When eating your meal, consider spicing it up with Nutritional yeast, and garlic n herb spice, or crushed red pepper if you think it's not spicy enough. Keep in mind herbs and spices are the highest antioxidant foods on the planet. Any time you spice up your meal you make it healthier.

16) When done store your pasta in the fridge and you have something you can eat for the next 3-4 days (Since there's no meat your pasta should stay good for awhile). After you microwave your leftover pasta, spicing it up will go a long way as far as making it taste fresh.


If you have any questions let me know. The first time you cook this may be hard but I swear by the 3rd time you'll be a pro. Also, to make things easier you can buy onions already chopped, buy bell peppers already chopped, buy kale frozen, and sometimes I see garlic pre-peeled so all you have to do is chop it)


PS: ALWAYS add beans, onions, garlic, mushrooms, and Kale/and-or any other dark leafy greens to any pasta you ever make for the rest of your life. Those foods are THAT healthy for you.
Link to Oil free tomato sauce (you can find it at Whole Foods):

https://engine2diet.com/blog/food/re...a-pasta-sauce/

To further inspire you:

Quote:
Plant Protein

Topic summary contributed by volunteer(s): Linda

Many vegans and vegetarians are asked how they get enough protein. An analysis of the eating records of a large sample of people following plant-based diets showed that, on average, they got 70% more protein than they needed every day. Beans, including canned beans, are an excellent plant protein source, as are lentils and split peas. Other examples include nuts, seeds, and soy.

The type of protein a person eats–primarily plant-based or primarily animal-based—matters to one’s health as food is a package deal: the protein cannot be isolated from other elements in the food. Overall, plant protein may provide healthier nutrients than animal protein. In the 1950’s, researchers found that coronary heart disease was almost non-existent among Ugandans, who consume their protein almost entirely from plant sources. Plant protein consumption may be linked to lower risk of heart disease, while the intake of animal protein can be associated with increased risk. Plant protein also appears linked to lower cancer risk than animal protein.

Nutritional research studies have found potential associations between a diet high in plant protein and the following beneficial effects:

Lower risk of allergies
Lower risk of bladder cancer
Lower blood pressure
Smaller BMI and slimmer waist
Lower total cholesterol
Phosphorus management for those suffering from chronic kidney disease
Lower risk of Crohn’s disease
Lower risk of endometrial cancer
Lower heart disease and cancer mortality
Lower risk of inflammatory bowel disease and ulcerative colitis
Life extension
Beneficial effects on psychological disorders linked to low serotonin levels
Better preservation of muscle mass as one ages
Beneficial effects for Parkinson’s disease patients
Lower risk of premature puberty
Slower progression of prostate cancer
See also related health topics animal protein, beans, lentils, nuts, plant-based diets, protein, seeds, and soy.
Source.

Remember animal protein itself causes us inflammation and is strongly linked with increased cancer rates. It is fair to say, the more animal protein you eat the sicker you will become. But if you switch your protein source to plants you flip the script, now instead of getting cancer, and dying younger, you will be fighting cancer with every bite and living longer and healthier!

ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
09-30-2018 , 11:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rexx14
I'd be interested in any fairly high protein WFBD recipes you might have.
The main problem for us protein seeking people is everything plant based has half the protein at best as a lean cut of meat :shrug:

Last edited by PJo336; 09-30-2018 at 11:03 PM. Reason: in relation to calories
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
09-30-2018 , 11:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapini
I made some non-processed meat tonight for dinner.

https://www.101cookingfortwo.com/eas...hicken-thighs/

Holy ****, was it delicious. Easily the best grilled chicken I've ever had.

And the best part? I didn't die.
Cool story bro, but I think if people like their prostates they are better off staying away from that dinner:

Quote:
Prostate Cancer

Just as glandular breast tissue can become cancerous, so can glandular prostate tissue. Autopsy studies show that about half of men over the age of 80 appear to have prostate cancer, and most die without ever knowing they had it.

Does food factor into prostate cancer risk?

Harvard University researchers followed more than a thousand men with early-stage prostate cancer for several years. Compared with men who rarely ate eggs, men who ate even less than a single egg a day appeared to have twice the risk of prostate cancer progression, such as metastasizing into the bones. The only thing potentially worse for prostate cancer than eggs was poultry: Men with more aggressive cancer who regularly ate chicken and turkey had up to four times the prostate cancer progression risk. On the other hand, less than a single daily serving of cruciferous vegetables such as broccoli, brussels sprouts, cabbage, cauliflower, or kale may cut the risk of cancer progression by more than half.

Researchers suggest that the link between consuming poultry and advancing cancer may be due to cooked-meat carcinogens, such as heterocyclic amines. For unknown reasons, these carcinogens build up more in the muscles of chickens and turkeys than in those of other animals. But what cancer-promoting substance is there in eggs? The answer may be choline, a compound found concentrated in eggs. Higher levels of choline in the blood have been associated with increased risk of developing prostate cancer, and men who consume two and a half or more eggs per week—basically an egg every three days—may have an 81 percent increased risk of dying from prostate cancer.

Dairy, too, appears to play a role. A 2015 meta-analysis found that high intakes of dairy products—milk, low-fat milk, and cheese, but not nondairy sources of calcium—appear to increase total prostate cancer risk.

Dr. Dean Ornish and Pritikin Research Foundation researchers showed that the blood of people randomized to a plant-based diet group appeared dramatically less hospitable to cancer-cell growth than the blood of people in the control group who continued to eat their typical diet. The blood of people eating plant-based diets was shown to fight cancer about eight times better than those on the standard American diet, as well as suppress cancer cell growth by 70 percent, nearly eight times the stopping power compared to those on a meat-centered menu.
Source.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
09-30-2018 , 11:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJo336
The main problem for us protein seeking people is everything plant based has half the protein at best as a lean cut of meat :shrug:
This still begs the question, why are you you seeking out something (animal protein) that is strongly linked to/causes disease and shortens lifespan to begin with?

I know you guys think I'm a "flat earther" but for the sake of your own health you really shouldn't ignore the I-GF1 story. It's one of the biggest stories in history of nutrition:

Quote:
Only about one in 10,000 people make it to be 100 years old. What’s their secret? Well, in 1993, a major breakthrough in longevity research was published: a single genetic mutation that doubled the lifespan of a tiny roundworm. Instead of all being dead by 30 days, the mutants lived 60 days or longer. This lifespan extension was the largest yet reported in any organism.

This Methuselah worm medical marvel is the equivalent of producing a healthy 200-year-old human—all because of a single mutation? That shouldn’t happen; I mean, presumably, aging is caused by multiple processes, many genes. How could just knocking out one gene double the lifespan?

What is this aging gene, anyway? This gene that so speeds up aging that if it’s knocked out, the animals live twice as long? It’s been called the Grim Reaper gene. What is it? It’s the worm equivalent of the human IGF-1 receptor. And mutations of that same receptor in humans may help explain why some people live to be a hundred, and other people don’t.

So, is it just the luck of the draw whether we got good genes or bad? No, we can turn on and off the expression of these genes, depending on what we eat. Three years ago, I profiled a remarkable series of experiments about IGF-1—insulin-like growth factor 1—this cancer-promoting growth hormone, released in excess amounts by our liver when we eat animal protein. So, men and women who don’t eat meat, egg whites, or dairy proteins have significantly lower levels circulating within their bodies.

Switching people to a plant-based diet can significantly lower IGF-1 levels within just 11 days, markedly improving the ability of women’s bloodstreams to suppress breast cancer growth, and then kill breast cancer cells off.

Similarly, the blood serum of men on plant-based diets suppresses prostate cancer cell growth about eight times better than before they changed their diet. This dramatic improvement in cancer defenses is, however, abolished if you add back just the amount of IGF-1 banished from their systems because they were eating and living healthier.

This is one way to explain the low rates of cancer among plant-based populations: the drop in animal protein intake leads to a drop in IGF-1, which leads to a drop in cancer growth. An effect so powerful, Dr. Dean Ornish and colleagues appeared to be able to reverse the progression of prostate cancer without chemo, surgery, or radiation—just a plant-based diet, and other healthy lifestyle changes.

Now, when we’re kids, we need growth hormones to grow. There’s a rare genetic defect that causes severe IGF-1 deficiency, leading to a type of dwarfism—but also apparently makes you effectively cancer-proof. Not a single death from cancer in about 100 individuals with IGF-1 deficiency. How about 200 individuals? None developed cancer. See, most malignant tumors are covered in IGF-1 receptors. But if there’s no IGF-1 around, then they may not be able to grow and spread.

This may help explain why those eating low-carb diets appear to cut their lives short. But not just any low-carb diet—specifically those based on animal sources, whereas vegetable-based low-carb diets were associated with a lower risk of death.

But look, low-carb diets are high in animal fat, as well as animal protein. So, how do we know it wasn’t the saturated animal fat that was killing people off, and it had nothing to do with the protein? What we need is a study that just follows a few thousand people and their protein intakes for 20 years or so, and just see who lives longest, who gets cancer, who doesn’t. But, there’s never been a study like that—until now.

6,000 men and women over age 50 from across the U.S. were followed for 18 years, and those under age 65 with high protein intakes had a 75% increase in overall mortality, and a fourfold increase in the risk of dying from cancer. But not all proteins; these associations were either abolished or attenuated if the proteins were plant-derived. This all makes sense, given the higher IGF-1 levels among those eating lots of animal protein.

The sponsoring university sent out a press release with a memorable opening line: “That chicken wing you’re eating could be as deadly as a cigarette,” explaining that eating a diet rich in animal proteins during middle age makes you four times more likely to die from cancer than someone with a low-protein diet—a mortality risk factor comparable to smoking cigarettes. And when they say low-protein diet, what they actually mean is just getting the recommended amount of protein.

“Almost everyone is going to have a cancer cell or pre-cancerous cell in them at some point. The question is: Does it progress?” said one of the lead researchers. That may depend on what we eat.

“The question is not whether a certain diet allows you to do well in the short term,” one of the researchers noted. “But can it help you survive to be 100?” It wasn’t just more deaths from cancer; middle-aged people who eat lots of protein from animal sources were found to be more susceptible to early death in general. Crucially, the same did not apply to plant proteins, like beans. And it wasn’t the fat, but the animal protein that appeared to be the culprit.

What was the response to the revelation that diets high in meat, eggs, and dairy could be as harmful to health as smoking? Well, one nutrition scientist replied that it was potentially dangerous. It could damage the effectiveness of important public health messages. A smoker might think, “Why bother quitting smoking if my ham and cheese sandwich is just as bad for me?'”

It reminds me of a famous Philip Morris cigarette ad that tried to downplay the risks by saying, “Hey, you think second-hand smoke is bad, increasing the risk of lung cancer 19%; well, hey, drinking one or two glasses of milk may be three times as bad—62% increased risk of lung cancer. Or doubling the risk frequently cooking with oil; or tripling your risk of heart disease eating non-vegetarian; or multiplying your risk six-fold eating lots of meat and dairy.” So, they conclude, “Let’s keep some perspective here.” The risk of cancer from secondhand smoke may be well below that of other everyday activities. So, breathe deep.

That’s like saying: yeah, don’t worry about getting stabbed, because getting shot is so much worse. It’s like saying if you don’t wear seat belts, you might as well have unprotected sex. If you go bungee jumping, might as well disconnect your smoke alarms at home. Two risks don’t make a right.

Of course, you’ll note Philip Morris stopped throwing dairy under the bus once they purchased Kraft Foods.
Source.

Even Harvard says you should get off the animal protein assuming you wanna live longer:

Quote:
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE:

High animal protein intake was positively associated with cardiovascular mortality and high plant protein intake was inversely associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, especially among individuals with at least 1 lifestyle risk factor. Substitution of plant protein for animal protein, especially that from processed red meat, was associated with lower mortality, suggesting the importance of protein source.
Source.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
09-30-2018 , 11:54 PM
Have you posted this one yet?
Quote:
Both high and low percentages of carbohydrate diets were associated with increased mortality, with minimal risk observed at 50–55% carbohydrate intake. Low carbohydrate dietary patterns favouring animal-derived protein and fat sources, from sources such as lamb, beef, pork, and chicken, were associated with higher mortality, whereas those that favoured plant-derived protein and fat intake, from sources such as vegetables, nuts, peanut butter, and whole-grain breads, were associated with lower mortality, suggesting that the source of food notably modifies the association between carbohydrate intake and mortality.

Our findings suggest a negative long-term association between life expectancy and both low carbohydrate and high carbohydrate diets when food sources are not taken into account. These data also provide further evidence that animal-based low carbohydrate diets should be discouraged. Alternatively, when restricting carbohydrate intake, replacement of carbohydrates with predominantly plant-based fats and proteins could be considered as a long-term approach to promote healthy ageing.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
10-01-2018 , 02:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregorio
For me at least, the science on low carb diets is clear and convincing. The typical meat based low carb diet is both dangerous and life shortening:

A good video on the topic:



And A good write-up: How a Low-Carb Diet is Metabolically Like Being Obese

As far as low carb plant based diets? The results are consistent with what you posted. Low carb plant based diets are indeed health promoting:



But what about that last part? What about the "negative long-term association between life expectancy and....high carbohydrate diets when food sources are not taken into account"? Without even reading this study I would bet a lot of money this association is true, because most people on this planet are eating the wrong carbs! There's a big difference between lentils and skittles. There's a big difference between Fruit Loops and Oatmeal, there's a big difference between white bread and black beans, and there's a big difference between Starburst candy and berries, or a Coke/Pepsi and a greens and berry smoothie. Not all carbs are equal. Most people on this planet--especially Americans--are eating too much of the processed junk carbs and this is why this thread really isn't about veganism becuz it's just too easy to be an unhealthy vegan. And maybe an unhealthy vegan is still healthier than your typical SAD person (standard american diet), but so what. Trying to be healthier than someone eating SAD is like trying to be a better person then Ted Bundy. It's an extremely low bar. We can do WAY better.

Processed junk carbs, like meat, eggs and dairy, is gonna cause all kinds of health problems. The path to optimal health is really simple. Avoid foods that cause disease and then center one's diet around real food like, legumes, whole grains, fruits, veggies, nuts, seeds, herbs and spices.
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
10-01-2018 , 02:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rexx14
I'd be interested in any fairly high protein WFBD recipes you might have.
I don't know if this counts as high protein, but it has around 30 grams for the whole bowl and it's what I often eat for breakfast. This is a simple oatmeal dish. I make my oatmeal the lazy way, with the microwave, but it tastes better if you actually do it the traditional way in a pan.

First before I put my oatmeal in the microwave I make up my bowl:

1 chopped banana
2 TBSPs of ground chia seeds
2 TBSPs of ground flax seeds
2 chopped up medjool dates
1 TSP of ceylon cinnamon
1/2 TSP of vanilla bean powder
2 TBSPs of peanut butter (no other ingredients but the nuts!)
Heat up 1 cup of frozen strawberries and 1 cup of blueberries and then dump them in the bowl. I buy mostly frozen berries cuz they're way cheaper.

Ok now our bowl is finished. The next step is to get out another bowl and put 1 cup of old fashioned thick rolled oats in it along with 2 cups of plain unsweetened almond milk or soymilk. Soymilk is healthier but I prefer the taste of almond milk. Then heat that bowl up in the microwave for approx 3 and a half minutes. After that pour the hot bowl into the bowl you've already made. Make sure it's a big bowl! Mix and enjoy!
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote
10-01-2018 , 03:13 AM
I appreciate the recipes and I do love oatmeal but after putting those ingredients in my calorie counter it comes out at 1508 calories just for breakfast Rather a lot more than my standard oatmeal breakfast with fruit and chia seeds, although it did have 48g of protein lol. Do you intermittent fast or something?
ITT we discuss the optimal diet: A Whole Food Plant Based Diet Quote

      
m