Quote:
Originally Posted by Montecore
Can you link to your programming again? I missed it the first time around.
Glad to hear things are going so well, though.
It's going to be something like this. Basically an intermediate 3 way split DC training kind of thing but a little less frantic exercise rotation and more pulling volume.
Push 1:
Incline BB 3 sets fail
Flat DB 2 sets fail
Close pushups 2 sets fail
Triceps+shoulders pump work
Pull 1:
DL 80%x2x4, 80% amrap
BB Row 3 submax
Vertical Pull 3-4 submax
DB CSR 3 sets fail
Single arm cable row 2 sets fail
Hammer curl 3 sets fail
Legs 1 :
Leg press
static lunge
hyperxtensions
Whatever else
Push 2:
DB incline 3 sets
Flat DB 2 sets
Close pushups: 2 sets
Triceps+shoulders pump
Pull 2
Rows
Chins (I don't know which ones will be done first)
DB CSR
Single arm cable row
Curl variation
Legs 2:
Squat when I'm back to it, submax sets across maybe 3 sets of 8
Static lunge
hyperextensions
Mo: push
Tu: pull
We off
Thu: legs
Fri: push
Next mo: Pull
Tu: Legs
We Off
Thu: Push
.... etc
So everything is hit every 4 days and then every 6 days, averaging twice every 10 days. Push workouts about 7 sets of "hard" lifts ~45 minutes, pull workouts without DLs around 60 minutes, dl workouts around 80 minutes. Very low volume.
Later as my VMO heals I'll do a moderate squat workout every 10 days. On the other leg day, I'll still squat, but much lighter and as a 2nd exercise after either hip belt squats or leg press (hoping for hip belt squats 15-20s).
Even though I'm sure they wouldn't like DC training as written, listening to the Barbell Medicine bros 3 part podcast on programming kinda cleared up a LOT of things for me. I can kinda see the rationale for rotating exercises systematically and semi-frequently from both an injury prevention and more consistent progression standpoint. None of their clients or posters are enhanced bodybuilders of course.
I also really like the 5th set for powerlifting program and want to do that once my elbows feel good, with some adjustments for bbing. Swede Burns sounds/looks/writes a bit ******edly, but the program in the book seems very well designed, yet simple. It's like he's writing for us guys approaching/beyond 30s who get injured easily; our joints and tendons just can't recover from a lot of the higher volume programs or high frequency squatting and dling programs like BB medicine bros would probably want us doing. And his clients seem to do well.
Nowadays when I look at a program I just think: Will this allow me to remain injury free? IDGAF about progressing "fast", just progressing slowly but never getting injured sounds absolutely ideal even if I'm giving up a few possible gains, ere on the side of conservatism.