Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow
doug to respond to your first point, i get what you're saying... its just i read an implication in how you write that people over 30 or 35 years of age are limited to a SELECT group of activites where they can be competitive and as i gave examples above, i think you can be competitive at the highest levels in MOST activites into your 40's. of course in your case i know this is academic cuase you happen to enjoy powerlifting...
The only thing I'm saying is sports are the best way to stay in shape. Staying in shape is really ****ing important to getting the most out of your life. I'm not making any statement about what sports are appropriate for various ages. All I'm saying is find something that you enjoy that fits into your schedule and be competitive enough at it so that you are motivated to eat correctly, lift weights, do cardio, etc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow
lol "bordering on being overly agressive" come on man you were on smylov squats and wanted to do smylov squats every month and you thought you could...
I like how you feel inclined to comment on a program that you've never attempted. When I started, I thought smolov would kick my ass. I didn't get as much out of it as I had hoped, but my performance on it was pretty good and it definitely did not lead to my injury. I finished my Smolov squat cycle in July and injured my back in December.
You could argue that my last smolov jr bench cycle pushed my over the edge and lead to the impinged nerve and I wouldn't disagree. I will say that I don't consider an impinged nerve to be a real injury, it's just a minor nuisance that gets in the way of max effort lifts. My chiropractor said that they are inevitable for anyone who lifts weights that doesn't get regular ART, and he was surprised I had made it that far without encountering one before.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow
i disagree that "injuries happen" it is symptomatic of programming and i predict that if you dont learn from what happens here you will have worse and more frequent problems in the future. its my personal opinion, based on my own experience, that rolling, for the most part, is somewhere between a waste of time and a distraction. look to FMS and FMS corrective work it is far more powerful.
you can take or leave what i post here i know you are knowledgable on this i dont mean to be rude or disrespectful stating this i just want to share with you what i know
From the website, FMS looks like a brand of stretching. Yeah dude, I know that static stretching antagonist muscles can improve performance. I wouldn't even put FMS into the same category as SMR or ART. SMR and ART describe treatments that can loosen a muscle, and FMS is a philosophy on how to improve mobility. There is no reason that FMS couldn't include both SMR and ART.
Rolling/SMR will be a waste of time if you don't progress to harder and smaller implements and have a good diagnosis of what your issues are and a plan of attack. Mindlessly rolling over your IT bands for 30 seconds with a soft foam roller every once in awhile won't do ****. Recognizing that your lateral knee pain around the femoral epicondyle is contributed to by poor tissue quality in the distal portion of your IT band and attacking it over a couple of weeks will do ****.