Quote:
Originally Posted by cookie
IPF keeps IPF'ing. Now a singlet and a belt isn't just that, now only certain manufactures are allowed at meets. Atleast I will have some wishes for xmas this year I guess. I do like the fact that doping is not allowed in IPF though.
Mendelson I do remember from that powerlifting documentary a few years back, sick sick bench.
http://www.allthingsgym.com/power-un...g-documentary/
I got to ask, feel free to PM or not answer or whatever, since 325 in 105 is just shy of the IPF world record, what are the views on doping at your gym?
Priest holds some national and world records. On powerliftingwatch.com, best of the best (since about 2007), 220 multiply lifters over 40 years old, his total is about 150 lbs more than 2nd place. He competes as an open lifter, not a master though. His total is 14th on the open "best of the best" list.
I assume you're referring to "doping" as anabolic steroid use? lolIPF again. I know they test. I also know they selectively test. A lot of people who lift in that federation are using illegal substances whether or not they get tested. Some people who are obviously using illegal stuff get favorable treatment about not getting tested. Without going into too much detail, there are ways to sidestep testing that some of these people use. I'm pretty sure the IPF decision makers know about this too. I'm not going to post examples here.
No one talks about personally using anything on my team. Use is not encouraged at all.
Personally, I am on HRT. I take about 5-10% of what a heavy user would take of testosterone cypionate (0.35 ml twice a week).
I dont know anything about the powerful, fast acting oral drugs, aside from the fact that they can **** you up. I know of some people who take that stuff, but they are not on my team. Some people on my team joke about some drug users as having purple heads, lol.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aidan
While you're both here: discussion at the gym this evening - several of our lifters were at a seminar on the weekend with a relatively well respected (international) coach. He was advocating when unracking for a bench bringing the bar closer to your belly button than straight above your shoulders in order to make a perfectly vertical descent bar path. The reasoning was that it reduces any horizontal momentum that would be in the direction of your feet almost to zero.
My take is that the extra fatigue on your stabilisers when waiting for the press call plus the moment arm created on the descent (bar in front of elbow) must be far more debilitating than any dubious benefit of this reduction in momentum. It also runs counter to the info Nuckolls collated from McLaughlin's in depth look at elite benchers.
The "well respected, international" coach is wrong. I'm interested to know who this is.
You are correct.
If you want to maximize what you can bench press, using a slightly curved bar path is the best way to do it. Its not just fatigue on your stabilizers, but that is part of it. Its also fatigue on your primary pushing muscles, and its about recruiting the strongest muscles throughout the ascent.
If you are holding the bar out over your chest, your triceps are holding it. If you hold it over your shoulders with your elbows turned out, its much easier to hold and it takes little out of your pushing muscles. When you bring the bar up in straight line, its going to get a lot harder about halfway up. If I do that in a shirt, I miss the lift every time. Sometimes with a smaller raw weight I can muscle it straight up, but it limits my top end.
The strongest way to bench is to begin the ascent by pushing the weight towards your head, then about a third of the way up, turn your elbows out while keeping your shoulders pulled down and back. This works best for both raw and shirted.