- I admitted that I was incorrect or imprecise about the details of nuts during the day because I was referring to the book from memory and it's almost two years that I read it.
- Almonds are allowed during the day. For them being "recommended" or just "optional" during the undereating phase, see the above point.
Quote:
I won't even get into the former statement which is completely made up.
page 199: "(...), whereas post-workout recovery meals are critical."
page 201: "Recovery meals should be composed of fast-assimilating proteins, good fat, and slow-releasing carbs: serving size 25-30 grams of protein and 10-25 g of carbs. The best fast-assimilating proteins are whey and milk proteins."
The comment "for people who work out a lot" referred specifically to the protein, not the nuts/seeds.
-
Quote:
I find it funny you resort to name calling and silliness
Hm..:
Quote:
I'm not calling you a liar, like someone says "My Dad can beat up your Dad." You are a liar.
Saying that one should disregard the derogatory and offensive connotation of the word because you are using it in a technical sense is purely ridiculous.
Quote:
Could someone point out where you went from talking about the undereating segment to the general recommendations of the diet?
You made this whole struggle about the difference between "recommended" and "optional" while it's pretty clear in the book that Hofmekler thinks that nuts and esp. almonds are great and a) I made it clear pretty early that I was imprecise about just that and b) therefore pointing out points in the book where he talks about the usefulness of nuts and seeds in general. And it's clearly not a misapplication of the diet to eat almonds during the day as it is regarded "optional".
-
Dude. These statements are so worthless and desperate. I made a general and blank statement about the diet and no statement of my application in detail. The specifics I gave only served the purpose that it's not an IF diet in the sense of "just drink water during the fast."
My statement was useless for any conclusion as to what degree I complied to the diet. After your pretty stupid statement about me misapplying the diet (which is even more stupid regarding that all the things I listed in my first post are clearly part of the undereating phase and my nuts/seeds mistake only happened in the post AFTER that) I wanted to clear up the misunderstandings about the use of nuts and seeds by pointing out the relevant statements in the book.
You are deliberately singling out details and blowing them out of proportion so you can maintain your point that I allegedly misapplied the diet while I have provided no base for that.
You are being intellectually dishonest by derailing the initial point of my statement and accusing me of being imprecise while the situation didn't call for absolute precision. Your first TWO replies where just poo. The pron and the consistency remark where nothing but destructive. Now trying to take the high ground and insulting me because you have successfully turned a casual remark about a diet into a struggle for precision and are now able to point out that the first statement was actually imprecise (what a revelation!) is really worth a lot. Congratulations.
you wish.
Quote:
especially when you want to position yourself as someone who has read "the book"
I even bought the book.